该用户的聊天记录定位。
I am logging in my account via google but since it migrated to the new SDK, I can't access my funds, even if they are still there according to polyscan
I am logging in my account via google but since it migrated to the new SDK, I can't access my funds, even if they are still there according to polyscan
Two somewhat stupid ideas, and I really don't know exactly if they're feasible, but they have been on my mind for weeks and I can't stop thinking on the downsides: 1. Making the World Cup winner market intermittent For the next cycle only, instead of opening it only really close to the WC itself, make it like the 2028 presidential elections. We already know beforehand that the winner comes from a fixed set of FIFA-associate nations, so people could trade during the 4-year cycle. With more time, this could benefit from passive trades during Euros/Copa América/AFCON seasons, and could as well be some kind of implied qualifying markets. For example, Cape Verde wasn't even close to be a World Cup team by 2023, yet they made it to the final cut. I could see a decent trading volume happening with this, as well as a way to be a even more tight early information source, not to mention that among the spread, people could get really interesting teams for a really cheap price, creating an incentive for leaving money on the market for long. This could open near the first qualifiers' day next year, aiming already the 2030 World Cup. 2. Creating a secondary decimal unit for trading This also branches from the World Cup market, but perhaps adding another unit for trading could maybe help getting more orders filled and a more dynamic and tighter/more sensible price changes. There could be a threshold for this, like "only on >$500M volume markets", but I really think this could be a really useful addition, *if possible*. Again, perhaps stupid ideas, don't know their feasibility. Just some thoughts.
Two somewhat stupid ideas, and I really don't know exactly if they're feasible, but they have been on my mind for weeks and I can't stop thinking on the downsides: 1. Making the World Cup winner market intermittent For the next cycle only, instead of opening it only really close to the WC itself, make it like the 2028 presidential elections. We already know beforehand that the winner comes from a fixed set of FIFA-associate nations, so people could trade during the 4-year cycle. With more time, this could benefit from passive trades during Euros/Copa América/AFCON seasons, and could as well be some kind of implied qualifying markets. For example, Cape Verde wasn't even close to be a World Cup team by 2023, yet they made it to the final cut. I could see a decent trading volume happening with this, as well as a way to be a even more tight early information source, not to mention that among the spread, people could get really interesting teams for a really cheap price, creating an incentive for leaving money on the market for long. This could open near the first qualifiers' day next year, aiming already the 2030 World Cup. 2. Creating a secondary decimal unit for trading This also branches from the World Cup market, but perhaps adding another unit for trading could maybe help getting more orders filled and a more dynamic and tighter/more sensible price changes. There could be a threshold for this, like "only on >$500M volume markets", but I really think this could be a really useful addition, *if possible*. Again, perhaps stupid ideas, don't know their feasibility. Just some thoughts.
Polymarket