MarketLens参与话题 1消息总数 8

MarketLens 2026-06-24 17:22:05 ↗ Hyperliquid

> because you need ~1m USDC buy order fill it on the NO order book yes, that's a very good point

> because you need ~1m USDC buy order fill it on the NO order book yes, that's a very good point

MarketLens 2026-06-24 17:07:20 ↗ Hyperliquid

not sure if we're arguing just about semantics. however, the main point is that there are no 1.1m USDC in play anywhere, so showing them is not useful to work with liquidity

not sure if we're arguing just about semantics. however, the main point is that there are no 1.1m USDC in play anywhere, so showing them is not useful to work with liquidity

MarketLens 2026-06-24 17:03:28 ↗ Hyperliquid HIP-4 订单簿 Yes/No 合并后 USDC 价值显示引争议

there's a selector between tokens and USDC (value)

there's a selector between tokens and USDC (value)

MarketLens 2026-06-24 17:00:37 ↗ Hyperliquid HIP-4 订单簿 Yes/No 合并后 USDC 价值显示引争议

yep, and that appears to be wrong when Yes tokens are merged into No orderbook

yep, and that appears to be wrong when Yes tokens are merged into No orderbook

MarketLens 2026-06-24 16:58:34 ↗ Hyperliquid HIP-4 订单簿 Yes/No 合并后 USDC 价值显示引争议

let's take this market as an example https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/trade/2026-world-cup-champion-argentina-yes there are 1M yes tokens in Yes orderbook at 0.01 with USDC value = 11,000 but when they appear in No orderbook they are accounted at 1,100,000 USDC value which is incorrect

let's take this market as an example https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/trade/2026-world-cup-champion-argentina-yes there are 1M yes tokens in Yes orderbook at 0.01 with USDC value = 11,000 but when they appear in No orderbook they are accounted at 1,100,000 USDC value which is incorrect

MarketLens 2026-06-24 16:55:07 ↗ Hyperliquid HIP-4 订单簿 Yes/No 合并后 USDC 价值显示引争议

but those are Yes shares merged into shown No orderbook!

but those are Yes shares merged into shown No orderbook!

MarketLens 2026-06-24 16:41:44 ↗ Hyperliquid HIP-4 订单簿 Yes/No 合并后 USDC 价值显示引争议

aha, that makes a lot of sense! however, when No orderbook was switched to USDC, those tokens from Yes orderbook were accounted as having 312534$ value (price = 0.9999$, not 0.0001 as in reality for those Yes tokens) merging liquidity makes sense. USDC values in that merged orderbook don't look right

aha, that makes a lot of sense! however, when No orderbook was switched to USDC, those tokens from Yes orderbook were accounted as having 312534$ value (price = 0.9999$, not 0.0001 as in reality for those Yes tokens) merging liquidity makes sense. USDC values in that merged orderbook don't look right

MarketLens 2026-06-24 06:44:08 ↗ Hyperliquid HIP-4 订单簿 Yes/No 合并后 USDC 价值显示引争议

HIP-4 no orderbook question. How can there be 321,489 No to be sold when the entire open interest is just 113,140 tokens?

HIP-4 no orderbook question. How can there be 321,489 No to be sold when the entire open interest is just 113,140 tokens?