该用户的聊天记录定位。
lmao discord rules you are bugging
lmao discord rules you are bugging
whats up my fav scam site, where multiple lawsuits are about to hit
whats up my fav scam site, where multiple lawsuits are about to hit
whats up my fav scam betting site, where additional context gets added after the resolution, changing the rules however it suits them
whats up my fav scam betting site, where additional context gets added after the resolution, changing the rules however it suits them
why do you guys keep changing the additional context? <@1503846101860487170> <@1272383282687905939>
why do you guys keep changing the additional context? <@1503846101860487170> <@1272383282687905939>
they try to change history by changing the rules because they see the FUD coming up and that they fucked up with the resolution
they try to change history by changing the rules because they see the FUD coming up and that they fucked up with the resolution
i take the L because this is feels like a rug back in the days lol polymarket wtf are you guys doing X will go nuts about this
i take the L because this is feels like a rug back in the days lol polymarket wtf are you guys doing X will go nuts about this
they will add anything they want lmao
they will add anything they want lmao
they should be sued wtf is this nonsense
they should be sued wtf is this nonsense
LMAO NO WAY THEY ADDED THIS "Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify."
LMAO NO WAY THEY ADDED THIS "Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify."
and even the additional context is wrong because there is an official MSTR document about the BTC sale
and even the additional context is wrong because there is an official MSTR document about the BTC sale
These are the rules, they were there from the beginning no additional context should count. Context should be there from the beginning or you guys need to refund the "YES" shares because everyone can make up additional context which just points to manipulation.
These are the rules, they were there from the beginning no additional context should count. Context should be there from the beginning or you guys need to refund the "YES" shares because everyone can make up additional context which just points to manipulation.
killing yourself is never an option, never bet what you can not loose but team is still wrong with their decision.
killing yourself is never an option, never bet what you can not loose but team is still wrong with their decision.
is this pump fun?
is this pump fun?
so just changing the rules after the resolution, making stuff up like "no information from MSTR" which is clearly wrong you can literally go on their official website and look into the official pdf which officially states that they sold 32 BTC between the period of may 26 to 31 is this what the team is doing?
so just changing the rules after the resolution, making stuff up like "no information from MSTR" which is clearly wrong you can literally go on their official website and look into the official pdf which officially states that they sold 32 BTC between the period of may 26 to 31 is this what the team is doing?