PolymarketRegarding presigning, does anyone know if api rejects orders with older timestamps? Or is it purely for uniqueness?
Regarding presigning, does anyone know if api rejects orders with older timestamps? Or is it purely for uniqueness?
tehnrd参与话题 3消息总数 84
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 84 条，显示第 1-50 条Says Mr. Doesn't Show PnL 😜
Says Mr. Doesn't Show PnL 😜
Websocket already has a tick size change event. Shouldn't y'all already be looking at that.
Websocket already has a tick size change event. Shouldn't y'all already be looking at that.
CS is like bare minimum. You need CS (or vibe code, good luck), system design architecture, understanding of order book dynamics, and intermediate statistics. Then just buy low, sell high.
CS is like bare minimum. You need CS (or vibe code, good luck), system design architecture, understanding of order book dynamics, and intermediate statistics. Then just buy low, sell high.
Oh, for combos, completely different
Oh, for combos, completely different
User websocket doesn't provide partial match events?
User websocket doesn't provide partial match events?
Large spike in order timeout errors too, in addition to latency
Large spike in order timeout errors too, in addition to latency
I just adjusted parameters that were losers on heavy fees strats
I just adjusted parameters that were losers on heavy fees strats
Nah, I was just an idiot not paying attention to fees
Nah, I was just an idiot not paying attention to fees
Was down 5k+ last week so at least moving in the right direction now
Was down 5k+ last week so at least moving in the right direction now
HAHA JUST KIDDING, FEEES, STILL DOWN $3700
HAHA JUST KIDDING, FEEES, STILL DOWN $3700
Finally broke even after being down $ 3,500.
Finally broke even after being down $ 3,500.
Because mine is going down
Because mine is going down
It seems like PnL charts are completely broken, showing more losses today than are even in my wallet. Lots of (all recent) crypto positions are also showing as Lost even when they are Won. Probably related
It seems like PnL charts are completely broken, showing more losses today than are even in my wallet. Lots of (all recent) crypto positions are also showing as Lost even when they are Won. Probably related
...and everything in Activity shows as Lost even if it was not.
...and everything in Activity shows as Lost even if it was not.
PnL charts are completely fucked right now? Shows I lost more today than is even in my wallet.
PnL charts are completely fucked right now? Shows I lost more today than is even in my wallet.
server response: { error: "invalid activity filter type TAKER_REBATE. must be: [TRADE SPLIT MERGE REDEEM REWARD CONVERSION DEPOSIT WITHDRAWAL YIELD MAKER_REBATE REFERRAL_REWARD]" }
server response: { error: "invalid activity filter type TAKER_REBATE. must be: [TRADE SPLIT MERGE REDEEM REWARD CONVERSION DEPOSIT WITHDRAWAL YIELD MAKER_REBATE REFERRAL_REWARD]" }
btc-updown-5m-1781831400 or btc-updown-5m-1781868900? ....got cooked on those two....I don't even know if you are doing crypto Or arXiv...dropped a research paper on flat earth 😂
btc-updown-5m-1781831400 or btc-updown-5m-1781868900? ....got cooked on those two....I don't even know if you are doing crypto Or arXiv...dropped a research paper on flat earth 😂
Thanks for confirming 🐒 🎯 . Seems like it is just some job that runs on a schedule and calcs the PnL at the time that job runs intead of actualy time of the order/settlement 🤷♂️
Thanks for confirming 🐒 🎯 . Seems like it is just some job that runs on a schedule and calcs the PnL at the time that job runs intead of actualy time of the order/settlement 🤷♂️
Does anyone know how https://betmoar.fun/ calculates daily PnL? I'm trying to reconcile it with my own order data, polymarket api data, and on-chain data and can't seem to get to the same numbers it provides. Maybe it is just a scheduled job at some random time on their servers?
Does anyone know how https://betmoar.fun/ calculates daily PnL? I'm trying to reconcile it with my own order data, polymarket api data, and on-chain data and can't seem to get to the same numbers it provides. Maybe it is just a scheduled job at some random time on their servers?
I never trust the auto-redeem, it's been way too buggy. I have a backup lambda that runs every few minutes and uses relayer to redeem.
I never trust the auto-redeem, it's been way too buggy. I have a backup lambda that runs every few minutes and uses relayer to redeem.
Zero latency binance price data.... just to hit 250ms taker delay
Zero latency binance price data.... just to hit 250ms taker delay
https://aws.amazon.com/braket/ ...deploying now
https://aws.amazon.com/braket/ ...deploying now
Even if you do this, you still have to get the data to Ireland or London. Research the fastest way to send packets a long distance. That's about as much help as anyone will give you, as speed is an edge.
Even if you do this, you still have to get the data to Ireland or London. Research the fastest way to send packets a long distance. That's about as much help as anyone will give you, as speed is an edge.
I really don't like that this endpoint (https://polymarket.com/api/crypto/crypto-price?symbol=BTC&eventStartTime=2026-06-01T11:40:00Z&variant=fiveminute&endDate=2026-06-01T11:45:00Z) is not part of the official API, but there doesn't seem to be a better place to get the price to beat, I wish there was a supported API for startPrice/endPrice
I really don't like that this endpoint (https://polymarket.com/api/crypto/crypto-price?symbol=BTC&eventStartTime=2026-06-01T11:40:00Z&variant=fiveminute&endDate=2026-06-01T11:45:00Z) is not part of the official API, but there doesn't seem to be a better place to get the price to beat, I wish there was a supported API for startPrice/endPrice
Re: Chainlink, $150 a month for a feed that is slower than just subscribing to the main exchanges directly.
Re: Chainlink, $150 a month for a feed that is slower than just subscribing to the main exchanges directly.
How does one get access to the chainlink feed directly, is it public?
How does one get access to the chainlink feed directly, is it public?
<@707597210845446214> could really use a supported/documented API to get accurate price to beat data for crypto markets
<@707597210845446214> could really use a supported/documented API to get accurate price to beat data for crypto markets
https://polymarket.com/api/crypto/crypto-price?symbol=BTC&eventStartTime=2026-06-01T11:40:00Z&variant=fiveminute&endDate=2026-06-01T11:45:00Z But I don't even think it is a documented API.
https://polymarket.com/api/crypto/crypto-price?symbol=BTC&eventStartTime=2026-06-01T11:40:00Z&variant=fiveminute&endDate=2026-06-01T11:45:00Z But I don't even think it is a documented API.
Does anyone even use RTDS? It seems too slow/delayed to be useful anyway. Reliable and documented API endpoint for crypto prices would be better
Does anyone even use RTDS? It seems too slow/delayed to be useful anyway. Reliable and documented API endpoint for crypto prices would be better
I swear the clob has a backend memory leak. It may partially explain why it gets better then slowly degrades after every release. Mem leaks can also be notoriously difficult to fix hence the patch wait and see, repeat, approach. They mention Go and garbage collection on the job description, probably not coincidence. But they also mention Rust, so maybe migrating to Rust
I swear the clob has a backend memory leak. It may partially explain why it gets better then slowly degrades after every release. Mem leaks can also be notoriously difficult to fix hence the patch wait and see, repeat, approach. They mention Go and garbage collection on the job description, probably not coincidence. But they also mention Rust, so maybe migrating to Rust
I'm 100% taker.
I'm 100% taker.
<@1335736302808727562> you making, taking, or makin n' takin
<@1335736302808727562> you making, taking, or makin n' takin
Not sure how you would do this with taker orders.
Not sure how you would do this with taker orders.
~~Or I'm an idiot and it is just one extra wallet you refer to yourself and then use that one 😂~~ confirmed idiot, will look into it
~~Or I'm an idiot and it is just one extra wallet you refer to yourself and then use that one 😂~~ confirmed idiot, will look into it
I'm running 40 different strats across a fleet of boxes, for me it's more than 5 min of work, so I'll just wait for the taker rebate 🤷♂️
I'm running 40 different strats across a fleet of boxes, for me it's more than 5 min of work, so I'll just wait for the taker rebate 🤷♂️
I also can't be fucked to set up multiple wallets and refer to myself and balance orders across all of them. I'm focusing on market alpha, not incentive programs. This is also an incentive program, but a nice to have, so why not get back some money.
I also can't be fucked to set up multiple wallets and refer to myself and balance orders across all of them. I'm focusing on market alpha, not incentive programs. This is also an incentive program, but a nice to have, so why not get back some money.
I don't do referrals at all. I'm 100% taker. The rebates will make a meaningful difference on net profit for me.
I don't do referrals at all. I'm 100% taker. The rebates will make a meaningful difference on net profit for me.
Looks like they fixed the backfill calc on taker rewards. I was expecting to be Silver, and it is now silver. Hopefully launched soon.
Looks like they fixed the backfill calc on taker rewards. I was expecting to be Silver, and it is now silver. Hopefully launched soon.
They are using cloudflare, so there might be a decent chance it actually works.
They are using cloudflare, so there might be a decent chance it actually works.
Does anyone know if Polymarket supports clients with IPv6? Testing it, but curious if anyone already knows the answer.
Does anyone know if Polymarket supports clients with IPv6? Testing it, but curious if anyone already knows the answer.
t4g.nano 2vCPU, $3/month. Have to be aware of it's limitation on CPU and memory though. As long as you stay under, it's fine
t4g.nano 2vCPU, $3/month. Have to be aware of it's limitation on CPU and memory though. As long as you stay under, it's fine
but everyone had delays, so as long as you were first in front of other takers, was all good.
but everyone had delays, so as long as you were first in front of other takers, was all good.
Not sure, what you mean, but it is one user account.
Not sure, what you mean, but it is one user account.
yes
yes
It was trivial, you could pre-calc orderId, apparently it was deterministic, and then just cancel it before the 250ms. So you just keep spamming orders, cancel but then when you actually want it to go through, you don't cancel.
It was trivial, you could pre-calc orderId, apparently it was deterministic, and then just cancel it before the 250ms. So you just keep spamming orders, cancel but then when you actually want it to go through, you don't cancel.
These are taker strategies fwiw...so other people were definitely beating me with the bypass.
These are taker strategies fwiw...so other people were definitely beating me with the bypass.
Looks like fill rates are definitely improving after the taker delay-bypass exploit was patched. Not massive, but certainly noticeable. Patch was June 5th
Looks like fill rates are definitely improving after the taker delay-bypass exploit was patched. Not massive, but certainly noticeable. Patch was June 5th
Me...reposting...I messed it up
Me...reposting...I messed it up
Makers on crypto markets getting fills at 1c or 99c, are you placing the resting limit as soon as the market shows up in new_market websocket event to get at front of the queue?
Makers on crypto markets getting fills at 1c or 99c, are you placing the resting limit as soon as the market shows up in new_market websocket event to get at front of the queue?
第 1 / 2 页
下一页 →