PolymarketI think it should be P1, but the rules are dumb and caused this
I think it should be P1, but the rules are dumb and caused this
Raskell参与话题 12消息总数 1029
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 1029 条，显示第 951-1000 条I am not arguing for P2
I am not arguing for P2
ye I am not saying that
ye I am not saying that
but volume is too big so probably wont happen
but volume is too big so probably wont happen
this mess is PMs fault, and they agree because the last time they made that mistake they refunded yes
this mess is PMs fault, and they agree because the last time they made that mistake they refunded yes
idk kinda shit to make retail bettors look up 1 year old clarifications instead of doing the rules fix they already did for the other similar markets
idk kinda shit to make retail bettors look up 1 year old clarifications instead of doing the rules fix they already did for the other similar markets
they dont seem to have sufficient documentation internally so the same mistake happened again
they dont seem to have sufficient documentation internally so the same mistake happened again
ye cause they regressed on the rules
ye cause they regressed on the rules
this precedent says they should refund yes and resolve no
this precedent says they should refund yes and resolve no
so this shit happened before almost a year ago. They refunded people and updated the rules. And now we have a market with old shit rules again?
so this shit happened before almost a year ago. They refunded people and updated the rules. And now we have a market with old shit rules again?
I see, the market you linked got refunded though
I see, the market you linked got refunded though
I see ```This market will resolve to “Yes” if MicroStrategy Incorporated announces that they have acquired additional Bitcoin between the dates in the title (from 12:00 AM ET on the first date to 11:59 PM ET on the last). Otherwise, it will resolve to “No”.``` as rules
I see ```This market will resolve to “Yes” if MicroStrategy Incorporated announces that they have acquired additional Bitcoin between the dates in the title (from 12:00 AM ET on the first date to 11:59 PM ET on the last). Otherwise, it will resolve to “No”.``` as rules
is it that market https://polymarket.com/event/will-microstrategy-purchase-bitcoin-august-26-september-1/will-microstrategy-purchase-bitcoin-august-26-september-1
is it that market https://polymarket.com/event/will-microstrategy-purchase-bitcoin-august-26-september-1/will-microstrategy-purchase-bitcoin-august-26-september-1
Why do I see different rules
Why do I see different rules
The sell market doesnt have "announcement" in its rules
The sell market doesnt have "announcement" in its rules
but thats a different market
but thats a different market
There is a clarification risk with the rules, but it should be P1 because shit released after market closure is unfair
There is a clarification risk with the rules, but it should be P1 because shit released after market closure is unfair
yeah so they got different rules, which is dumb
yeah so they got different rules, which is dumb
not clarified
not clarified
but thats UMA precedent right
but thats UMA precedent right
because obviously announcement markets would be P1
because obviously announcement markets would be P1
any sell market that clarified like this
any sell market that clarified like this
purchase market has very different rules
purchase market has very different rules
kk the sell market doesnt have it
kk the sell market doesnt have it
Ye it says announces in the rules of that market for me
Ye it says announces in the rules of that market for me
```t his market will resolve to “Yes” if MicroStrategy Incorporated announces``` https://polymarket.com/event/will-microstrategy-purchase-bitcoin-august-26-september-1/will-microstrategy-purchase-bitcoin-august-26-september-1
```t his market will resolve to “Yes” if MicroStrategy Incorporated announces``` https://polymarket.com/event/will-microstrategy-purchase-bitcoin-august-26-september-1/will-microstrategy-purchase-bitcoin-august-26-september-1
why they do that
why they do that
the old rules had announces, the new rules dont
the old rules had announces, the new rules dont
maybe
maybe
I think that was the one day where he didnt insult anyone
I think that was the one day where he didnt insult anyone
got clarified against actually iirc
got clarified against actually iirc
didnt count
didnt count
mustafa froze funds at least afaik
mustafa froze funds at least afaik
polymarket us phishing link
polymarket us phishing link
30th iirc
30th iirc
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/cMWRLXnw-y4
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/cMWRLXnw-y4
Its Marjorie Traitor Brown
Its Marjorie Traitor Brown
the one day we lost was when it didnt count that he insulted william the conquerer (and something else I forgot)
the one day we lost was when it didnt count that he insulted william the conquerer (and something else I forgot)
I used to be involved in trump insults for like 2 weeks straight finding resolutions
I used to be involved in trump insults for like 2 weeks straight finding resolutions
he mocked Biden by implying he cant do a nice signature
he mocked Biden by implying he cant do a nice signature
or a vibecoded lp bot
or a vibecoded lp bot
maybe a bot gone haywire
maybe a bot gone haywire
that guy? idk yeah
that guy? idk yeah
it was a joke
it was a joke
I dont think its likely ill win but if I did, nah
I dont think its likely ill win but if I did, nah
no I dont wanna do it, because I dont wanna take $500 from you
no I dont wanna do it, because I dont wanna take $500 from you
6.54ct
6.54ct
thats 6.5ct
thats 6.5ct
lol
lol
there is 24 hours left
there is 24 hours left