wht about cons of credible reporting? it says they have/will stop enriching
wht about cons of credible reporting? it says they have/will stop enriching
该用户的聊天记录定位。
wht about cons of credible reporting? it says they have/will stop enriching
wht about cons of credible reporting? it says they have/will stop enriching
yeah I figured the same from the MoU but we have credible reporting saying Iran will halt/stop further enrichment, its pretty clear Y if we have a strong consensus
yeah I figured the same from the MoU but we have credible reporting saying Iran will halt/stop further enrichment, its pretty clear Y if we have a strong consensus
they actually say that pt 4 will begin implementation, there is nothing to negotiate other pts will need negotations it leans Y according to MoU
they actually say that pt 4 will begin implementation, there is nothing to negotiate other pts will need negotations it leans Y according to MoU
all in on an alt should be fine, go for it
all in on an alt should be fine, go for it
this is cute ngl
this is cute ngl
but preclarif is good alfa
but preclarif is good alfa
still can go either way
still can go either way
i mean lets just wait for 40 mins now, we have fought enough ig
i mean lets just wait for 40 mins now, we have fought enough ig
ah i was saying abt this. but maybe mybad they were welcoming the sign that happened yest
ah i was saying abt this. but maybe mybad they were welcoming the sign that happened yest
yesterday imcrinee
yesterday imcrinee
you think they use consistent language across all markets? if that was the case there would have not been a dispute it is clear case of differing language nothing else here we have Agreement refers to an explicit acceptance, authorization or consent to the specified action. Only announcements of definitive agreement will qualify. Suggestions, negotiations, expressions of openness, or other non-definitive statements will not qualify.
you think they use consistent language across all markets? if that was the case there would have not been a dispute it is clear case of differing language nothing else here we have Agreement refers to an explicit acceptance, authorization or consent to the specified action. Only announcements of definitive agreement will qualify. Suggestions, negotiations, expressions of openness, or other non-definitive statements will not qualify.
doesn't seem like though
doesn't seem like though
enforced are the points like remove sanctions, let them sell oil, open hormuz
enforced are the points like remove sanctions, let them sell oil, open hormuz
exactly its part of the final deal not enforced by the MoU
exactly its part of the final deal not enforced by the MoU
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgmqzr6p9mo doesn't seem definitive to me. only the agreements that go into affect after signing the MoU can be called as "definitive". The claude 4 forces removal is in NO way definitive.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgmqzr6p9mo doesn't seem definitive to me. only the agreements that go into affect after signing the MoU can be called as "definitive". The claude 4 forces removal is in NO way definitive.
that doesn’t qualify
that doesn’t qualify
he explicitly said the 2 presidents signed and he just endorsed
he explicitly said the 2 presidents signed and he just endorsed
“endorsed” vs signed
“endorsed” vs signed
there is no definitive agreement, its conditional based on the deal taking place
there is no definitive agreement, its conditional based on the deal taking place
troop withdrawal Y arg?
troop withdrawal Y arg?
what service do you use bruh?
what service do you use bruh?
so now totally 4 independent reporting Al Arabiya, BBG, CNN, WSJ
so now totally 4 independent reporting Al Arabiya, BBG, CNN, WSJ
BBG and CNN have incorporated Tasnim and Cheung's statement but still kept the 14 pt memorandum as is https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-16/read-the-14-point-draft-memorandum-between-the-us-and-iran https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/17/middleeast/us-iran-war-mou-text-intl we now also have WSJ reporting independently https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/an-annotated-analysis-of-a-u-s-draft-of-the-iran-deal-6a9ec49f we still have strong consensus of credible reporting
BBG and CNN have incorporated Tasnim and Cheung's statement but still kept the 14 pt memorandum as is https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-16/read-the-14-point-draft-memorandum-between-the-us-and-iran https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/17/middleeast/us-iran-war-mou-text-intl we now also have WSJ reporting independently https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/an-annotated-analysis-of-a-u-s-draft-of-the-iran-deal-6a9ec49f we still have strong consensus of credible reporting
btw we now have WSJ independent reporting on the leaked MoU https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/an-annotated-analysis-of-a-u-s-draft-of-the-iran-deal-6a9ec49f
btw we now have WSJ independent reporting on the leaked MoU https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/an-annotated-analysis-of-a-u-s-draft-of-the-iran-deal-6a9ec49f
but thought many sources claimed vance and ghalif had signed remotely
but thought many sources claimed vance and ghalif had signed remotely
i actually lost money on that btw
i actually lost money on that btw
or even if they do we had consensus
or even if they do we had consensus
rules dont mention any waiting period?
rules dont mention any waiting period?
yeah but it cant be kept open indefinitely right
yeah but it cant be kept open indefinitely right
the bbg and al arabiya reports still holds btw, no cheung contradiction on them
the bbg and al arabiya reports still holds btw, no cheung contradiction on them
there's nothing new in that, the point being cnn had the mou that was actually signed on sunday which has been confirmed with various diplomats at G7
there's nothing new in that, the point being cnn had the mou that was actually signed on sunday which has been confirmed with various diplomats at G7
cheung said the exact same thing as the cnn reporter - that the text may not reflect the final mou to be signed, we know that it keeps changing
cheung said the exact same thing as the cnn reporter - that the text may not reflect the final mou to be signed, we know that it keeps changing
just fuck tasnim
just fuck tasnim
this cant be more Yes than we can ask for
this cant be more Yes than we can ask for
YESSSS
YESSSS
you sarcastic right?
you sarcastic right?
whaat
whaat
they literally said they have received the copy of the agreement. its just that the final wordings could change which doesn't even matter for this market
they literally said they have received the copy of the agreement. its just that the final wordings could change which doesn't even matter for this market
now we have so much consensus even better than before
now we have so much consensus even better than before
oh my god, the CNN article clearly says this
oh my god, the CNN article clearly says this
they literally say this comes after israel was denied to see the mou
they literally say this comes after israel was denied to see the mou
pls stop the ai slop
pls stop the ai slop
wtf is this guy saying
wtf is this guy saying
do you understand what consensus of credible reporting is?
do you understand what consensus of credible reporting is?
exact letter to letter
exact letter to letter
they are the same in bbg and al arabiya.
they are the same in bbg and al arabiya.
bbg and al arabiya is credible reporting and came within market time frame, the fuck are you saying?
bbg and al arabiya is credible reporting and came within market time frame, the fuck are you saying?
give us one credible source that is conflicting, amwaj is not a credible source for saying its contradicting. and what about the fact the "any portion of the mou" leak counts. there is enough points in bbg/al arabiya mou that match with your src
give us one credible source that is conflicting, amwaj is not a credible source for saying its contradicting. and what about the fact the "any portion of the mou" leak counts. there is enough points in bbg/al arabiya mou that match with your src
that's a good take on this. but even if you consider the complete text, bloomberg matches EXACTLY with Al Arabiya which already builds strong consensus.
that's a good take on this. but even if you consider the complete text, bloomberg matches EXACTLY with Al Arabiya which already builds strong consensus.
there is consensus that the leaked mou looks like whats reported
there is consensus that the leaked mou looks like whats reported