Polymarketignoring bbg and looking at amwaj to say it is contradicting is insanity
ignoring bbg and looking at amwaj to say it is contradicting is insanity
residual参与话题 10消息总数 204
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 204 条，显示第 101-150 条exactly , what the fuck is even amwaj
exactly , what the fuck is even amwaj
there are differences, even the order of terms is not the same. when you compare bbg and al arabiya they are exactly the same that is consensus enough
there are differences, even the order of terms is not the same. when you compare bbg and al arabiya they are exactly the same that is consensus enough
there is no credible contradiction to the MoU released by BBG. multiple outlets are directly cited bbg
there is no credible contradiction to the MoU released by BBG. multiple outlets are directly cited bbg
"an authorized representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran" -> not anyone
"an authorized representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran" -> not anyone
wow "we signed" is so clear to you, imcrinee
wow "we signed" is so clear to you, imcrinee
there has been no reporting about who on the iran side signed the deal. That is a KEY requirement in the rules. how do you guys not understand that? A qualifying agreement must be signed by both an authorized representative of the United States and an authorized representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
there has been no reporting about who on the iran side signed the deal. That is a KEY requirement in the rules. how do you guys not understand that? A qualifying agreement must be signed by both an authorized representative of the United States and an authorized representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
for real
for real
**A qualifying agreement must be signed by both an authorized representative of the United States and an authorized representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran.** where is credible reporting that says Iran has signed???
**A qualifying agreement must be signed by both an authorized representative of the United States and an authorized representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran.** where is credible reporting that says Iran has signed???
dude the truth social post was 7-8 hrs before the clari, that post is not gonna work
dude the truth social post was 7-8 hrs before the clari, that post is not gonna work
are you talking about https://polymarket.com/event/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by Jun12?
are you talking about https://polymarket.com/event/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by Jun12?
it may qualify as an attack in negative manner in general i have seen the “insult” bar in poly is too low
it may qualify as an attack in negative manner in general i have seen the “insult” bar in poly is too low
https://polymarket.com/event/will-spacexs-valuation-hit-by-june-30 you may want to improve the language for downward hit here. both up and down strikes use "reaches or exceeds" which is technically incorrect.
https://polymarket.com/event/will-spacexs-valuation-hit-by-june-30 you may want to improve the language for downward hit here. both up and down strikes use "reaches or exceeds" which is technically incorrect.
why? the ann is in market time frame
why? the ann is in market time frame
only the announcement has to be in market time frame
only the announcement has to be in market time frame
why do we need the operation to be restarted after may 22 btw?
why do we need the operation to be restarted after may 22 btw?
<@1400131860612513894> I think you guys should consider making an update to the resolution source for largest/second/third largest company end of <month> markets? https://polymarket.com/event/largest-company-end-of-june-712 the current - consensus of credible reporting is very vague and can lead to confusions as it happened end of May. happy to discuss and suggest sources, thanks!
<@1400131860612513894> I think you guys should consider making an update to the resolution source for largest/second/third largest company end of <month> markets? https://polymarket.com/event/largest-company-end-of-june-712 the current - consensus of credible reporting is very vague and can lead to confusions as it happened end of May. happy to discuss and suggest sources, thanks!
what is trump insult on jun 10?
what is trump insult on jun 10?
the additional context allows for mythos class models and it is one as per anthropic so its a Y
the additional context allows for mythos class models and it is one as per anthropic so its a Y
its a Y as per the rules
its a Y as per the rules
the fuck are you saying dude?
the fuck are you saying dude?
yeah but now even if its not named "Mythos" and not the referenced model it still counts!
yeah but now even if its not named "Mythos" and not the referenced model it still counts!
that means it is not the same model referenced in the leak. the model referenced in the leak was said to have exceptional ability to find and exploit zero-day vulnerabilities and they planned to release it to a closed set of clients (proj glass wing). the model they release publicly today or later wont be this model but it will still qualify as per the "NEW" rules.
that means it is not the same model referenced in the leak. the model referenced in the leak was said to have exceptional ability to find and exploit zero-day vulnerabilities and they planned to release it to a closed set of clients (proj glass wing). the model they release publicly today or later wont be this model but it will still qualify as per the "NEW" rules.
earlier the rules said: Products labeled as Claude Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus 4.7/5.0 or similar will not count for this market's resolution unless they are confirmed to be the same model referenced in the leak. and now they added more context saying: Any model whose official name includes “Mythos,” or that Anthropic officially describes as a “Mythos-class” model or similar, will qualify towards this market’s resolution. now this means any model not mythos (the actual one that was leaked) just being a mythos-class (they most prob wont launch the actual mythos model that was leaked before) can be used to resolve to Y? this is a significant change in the rules.
earlier the rules said: Products labeled as Claude Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus 4.7/5.0 or similar will not count for this market's resolution unless they are confirmed to be the same model referenced in the leak. and now they added more context saying: Any model whose official name includes “Mythos,” or that Anthropic officially describes as a “Mythos-class” model or similar, will qualify towards this market’s resolution. now this means any model not mythos (the actual one that was leaked) just being a mythos-class (they most prob wont launch the actual mythos model that was leaked before) can be used to resolve to Y? this is a significant change in the rules.
can you pls send the link?
can you pls send the link?
nah, not yet
nah, not yet
you were having small talk with me
you were having small talk with me
i was the other guy dude
i was the other guy dude
lol you were unbanned 5d ago i guess
lol you were unbanned 5d ago i guess
i thought they unbanned you?
i thought they unbanned you?
there is literally No flight I can see which departed by 8 Jun 11:59pm ET
there is literally No flight I can see which departed by 8 Jun 11:59pm ET
how can Jun 8 go Yes ffs?
how can Jun 8 go Yes ffs?
the other brackets can go yes as there is a valid departure on Jun 9 https://www.flightaware.com/live/flight/IRA1558/history/20260609/0525Z/OIIE/OEJN
the other brackets can go yes as there is a valid departure on Jun 9 https://www.flightaware.com/live/flight/IRA1558/history/20260609/0525Z/OIIE/OEJN
why write so strict rules if you wanna change them later?!
why write so strict rules if you wanna change them later?!
some say there was a moscow flight? where is that?
some say there was a moscow flight? where is that?
can someone link to the flight departed from IKA by June 8 ET?
can someone link to the flight departed from IKA by June 8 ET?
so poly just changed the rules for mythos market now? https://polymarket.com/event/claude-mythos-released-by/will-a-claude-mythos-model-be-released-by-june-15-2026-454-267 earlier the rules said: Products labeled as Claude Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus 4.7/5.0 or similar will not count for this market's resolution unless they are confirmed to be the same model referenced in the leak. and now they added more context saying: Any model whose official name includes “Mythos,” or that Anthropic officially describes as a “Mythos-class” model or similar, will qualify towards this market’s resolution. now this means any model not mythos (the actual one that was leaked) just being a mythos-class (they most prob wont launch the actual mythos model that was leaked before) can be used to resolve to Y? this is a significant change in the rules. <@941405798096076880> <@1272383282687905939> <@1212792946341183578>
so poly just changed the rules for mythos market now? https://polymarket.com/event/claude-mythos-released-by/will-a-claude-mythos-model-be-released-by-june-15-2026-454-267 earlier the rules said: Products labeled as Claude Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus 4.7/5.0 or similar will not count for this market's resolution unless they are confirmed to be the same model referenced in the leak. and now they added more context saying: Any model whose official name includes “Mythos,” or that Anthropic officially describes as a “Mythos-class” model or similar, will qualify towards this market’s resolution. now this means any model not mythos (the actual one that was leaked) just being a mythos-class (they most prob wont launch the actual mythos model that was leaked before) can be used to resolve to Y? this is a significant change in the rules. <@941405798096076880> <@1272383282687905939> <@1212792946341183578>
cn someone show how IKA dept by June 8 is a yes?
cn someone show how IKA dept by June 8 is a yes?
bm ob canada referendum
bm ob canada referendum
bm ob referendum
bm ob referendum
there is no scam
there is no scam
the key point is this referendum cannot establish the desire for independence
the key point is this referendum cannot establish the desire for independence
..
..
this referendum doesn’t do that
this referendum doesn’t do that
no
no
it is to know if people want the right to lay their desire
it is to know if people want the right to lay their desire
The market specifies that a vote must "establish the province's desire for independence," it implies a definitive statement of intent to leave. A vote to commence a process does not do this. the population may want the tool of negotiation or the right to choose, but may explicitly not desire the ultimate separation.
The market specifies that a vote must "establish the province's desire for independence," it implies a definitive statement of intent to leave. A vote to commence a process does not do this. the population may want the tool of negotiation or the right to choose, but may explicitly not desire the ultimate separation.
yes whats wrong with that?
yes whats wrong with that?
wtf scotty
wtf scotty
exactly, does that measure the desire for independence directl-> NO
exactly, does that measure the desire for independence directl-> NO