Polymarketdef trying to play part of spoiler
def trying to play part of spoiler
whamapajama参与话题 3消息总数 228
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 228 条，显示第 101-150 条bibi a jerk
bibi a jerk
for ceasefire markets, rules said only agreement needed to be made, and that's it's okay if they never took effect i gotta head out for a bit, gl!
for ceasefire markets, rules said only agreement needed to be made, and that's it's okay if they never took effect i gotta head out for a bit, gl!
we'll see what happens, Y is not dead, clarification will come
we'll see what happens, Y is not dead, clarification will come
but i think most of us (and rest of world) are unsure if there's actually going to be a signing tomorrow And i'm personally hoping there is btw, i have like 300k peace shares So are we going to resolve based on face value, or based on actual state of world
but i think most of us (and rest of world) are unsure if there's actually going to be a signing tomorrow And i'm personally hoping there is btw, i have like 300k peace shares So are we going to resolve based on face value, or based on actual state of world
hi fish! only one day left
hi fish! only one day left
link the articles, what did they say?
link the articles, what did they say?
i do think it's bad for Yes case, especially taken together with the clarification issued for this market. The statement is similar in strength imo. But i think the main question is: is poly looking to resolve on a single statement, or are they going to want to verify its truth in some capacity That will determine how this market will go
i do think it's bad for Yes case, especially taken together with the clarification issued for this market. The statement is similar in strength imo. But i think the main question is: is poly looking to resolve on a single statement, or are they going to want to verify its truth in some capacity That will determine how this market will go
If they had taken it at face value (which would have been a very reasonable), then it should have resolved as Yes. It was not written as a conditional statement. my takeaway was poly took trump's blockade "announcement" as ambiguous, meaning they interpreted the meaning rather than taking it at face value
If they had taken it at face value (which would have been a very reasonable), then it should have resolved as Yes. It was not written as a conditional statement. my takeaway was poly took trump's blockade "announcement" as ambiguous, meaning they interpreted the meaning rather than taking it at face value
imagine they clarify Y while we're waiting to see if the agreement will be agreed upon in the next 24 hrs
imagine they clarify Y while we're waiting to see if the agreement will be agreed upon in the next 24 hrs
it'd be 50-50 if i didn't already close my N position
it'd be 50-50 if i didn't already close my N position
eagle makin chicken noises
eagle makin chicken noises
this some real eagle shit
this some real eagle shit
you an eagle, swaggel?
you an eagle, swaggel?
like someone bout to hit a hole-in-one, but an eagle swoops in to knock the ball off course
like someone bout to hit a hole-in-one, but an eagle swoops in to knock the ball off course
don't crush thonk's dream of a 1000x
don't crush thonk's dream of a 1000x
because then we'd be rich, duh, inshallah!
because then we'd be rich, duh, inshallah!
lol
lol
so how close is the final vote going to be?
so how close is the final vote going to be?
i applaud him, he should have 1000 kids imo
i applaud him, he should have 1000 kids imo
it's gemini's response, so who knows, i didn't verify
it's gemini's response, so who knows, i didn't verify
"X Æ A-Xii, is officially pronounced "Ex Ash A Twelve" according to Musk"
"X Æ A-Xii, is officially pronounced "Ex Ash A Twelve" according to Musk"
kalii and kali, for twins
kalii and kali, for twins
isn't that child abuse?
isn't that child abuse?
dame lillard has twin kids, one is named kalii, the other is kali
dame lillard has twin kids, one is named kalii, the other is kali
"asshole" for nickname
"asshole" for nickname
X A A shi
X A A shi
a guy who shows -266k PnL in his name does not get embarrassed easily
a guy who shows -266k PnL in his name does not get embarrassed easily
he still doesn't respect me, see how he ignored me otherwise?
he still doesn't respect me, see how he ignored me otherwise?
here's the thing, fish might call me milord, but money can't buy respect
here's the thing, fish might call me milord, but money can't buy respect
that is less of an insult, imo
that is less of an insult, imo
i'm insulted by that excellent insult
i'm insulted by that excellent insult
can't go back now
can't go back now
it's kinda like when another bracket goes Y, he's already started paying out
it's kinda like when another bracket goes Y, he's already started paying out
very true
very true
but saying I declined skips a meaningful part which is that he accepted before i declined a change in terms
but saying I declined skips a meaningful part which is that he accepted before i declined a change in terms
you have no standing! <@952241341029556254>
you have no standing! <@952241341029556254>
i'm very serious
i'm very serious
Agreements can seemingly come together very quickly
Agreements can seemingly come together very quickly
oh?
oh?
(i don't know what that means)
(i don't know what that means)
ohhhhhhh
ohhhhhhh
bahrain vs syria?
bahrain vs syria?
what mogging
what mogging
noooo you!
noooo you!
fish!
fish!
did you just call Car an influencer?
did you just call Car an influencer?
same, i have $14k in shares that will 100% expire worthless in 6 hours, i couldn't place limit orders When is this going to be addressed? <@961050834743992330>
same, i have $14k in shares that will 100% expire worthless in 6 hours, i couldn't place limit orders When is this going to be addressed? <@961050834743992330>
what is up with the OB? i have shares that i must sell today, and I can't
what is up with the OB? i have shares that i must sell today, and I can't
say I say 1c, then you can either take the over, or bid lower
say I say 1c, then you can either take the over, or bid lower