秋田预测市场 · Discord 审计

whamapajama参与话题 3消息总数 228

该用户的聊天记录定位。

Reset

聊天记录

共 228 条,显示第 1-50 条
whamapajama 2026-07-13 19:48:34 Polymarket

Gl if you tail tho

Gl if you tail tho

whamapajama 2026-07-13 19:48:07 Polymarket

Fwiw I’ve bet this size on more than a few occasions for 10-15c edge 😂

Fwiw I’ve bet this size on more than a few occasions for 10-15c edge 😂

whamapajama 2026-07-10 02:15:06 Polymarket

<@1503846101860487170> Can we get a Lebron next team announcement timing market? It's the leading NBA story every day: "Where will he go? And when will he announce?"

<@1503846101860487170> Can we get a Lebron next team announcement timing market? It's the leading NBA story every day: "Where will he go? And when will he announce?"

whamapajama 2026-07-09 08:10:16 Polymarket

Can we get a "When will Lebron announce his next team?" market? Lebron's decision is ready made for a timing market. NBA waiting on him to announce his decision, it's a daily topic. He could easily announce tmw, or he might decide to take weeks. <@1212792946341183578> <@1402074242211643422> <@1272383282687905939>

Can we get a "When will Lebron announce his next team?" market? Lebron's decision is ready made for a timing market. NBA waiting on him to announce his decision, it's a daily topic. He could easily announce tmw, or he might decide to take weeks. <@1212792946341183578> <@1402074242211643422> <@1272383282687905939>

whamapajama 2026-07-08 14:23:17 Polymarket

https://polymarket.com/event/nba-when-will-lebron-sign-20260701170840224/will-lebron-james-sign-his-next-nba-contract-on-july-7-or-after-20260701170840231 Can we add more dates? The last date expired <@1212792946341183578> <@1402074242211643422> <@1272383282687905939>

https://polymarket.com/event/nba-when-will-lebron-sign-20260701170840224/will-lebron-james-sign-his-next-nba-contract-on-july-7-or-after-20260701170840231 Can we add more dates? The last date expired <@1212792946341183578> <@1402074242211643422> <@1272383282687905939>

whamapajama 2026-07-06 21:12:20 Polymarket

=== How long will Lebron's next contract be? Sub-markets: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years+

=== How long will Lebron's next contract be? Sub-markets: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years+

whamapajama 2026-07-06 21:10:56 Polymarket

Will Lebron announce that the 26-27 NBA season will be his last? (i.e. Is this Lebron's last season?) Multiple expiries: July 15, July 31, Oct 31, Dec 31 Could easily miss opportunity to make market about this milestone, he's close to the end cc: <@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578> <@1402074242211643422>

Will Lebron announce that the 26-27 NBA season will be his last? (i.e. Is this Lebron's last season?) Multiple expiries: July 15, July 31, Oct 31, Dec 31 Could easily miss opportunity to make market about this milestone, he's close to the end cc: <@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578> <@1402074242211643422>

whamapajama 2026-07-05 14:34:24 Polymarket

bc i'm being marked 😂 clearly the name changes aren't helping much and guy doesn't know the definition of a pump 'n dump; buying while staying silent, and then selling at a higher price while still staying silent /= pump 'n dump

bc i'm being marked 😂 clearly the name changes aren't helping much and guy doesn't know the definition of a pump 'n dump; buying while staying silent, and then selling at a higher price while still staying silent /= pump 'n dump

whamapajama 2026-07-05 11:45:37 Polymarket

Will Lebron announce that the upcoming NBA season (26-27) is his last season? Deadline: Start of 26-27 NBA season <@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>

Will Lebron announce that the upcoming NBA season (26-27) is his last season? Deadline: Start of 26-27 NBA season <@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>

whamapajama 2026-07-04 13:13:13 Polymarket 自动兑付功能异常:关闭后仍被强制自动兑付

apparently the chart doesn't correctly account for losses due to expired worthless Yes shares acquired via conversion

apparently the chart doesn't correctly account for losses due to expired worthless Yes shares acquired via conversion

whamapajama 2026-07-04 13:11:06 Polymarket 自动兑付功能异常:关闭后仍被强制自动兑付

my pnl was off by a lot when i hadn't closed losses from Yes shares that had been converted from NO shares

my pnl was off by a lot when i hadn't closed losses from Yes shares that had been converted from NO shares

whamapajama 2026-07-04 11:44:25 Polymarket

your just a hater boob

your just a hater boob

whamapajama 2026-07-04 09:33:56 Polymarket

https://polymarket.com/event/nba-how-much-will-lebrons-next-contract-be-20260630183002758 Similar to this market, except "How long will Lebron's next contract be?" 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, Unsigned Deadline: Start of reg season <@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>

https://polymarket.com/event/nba-how-much-will-lebrons-next-contract-be-20260630183002758 Similar to this market, except "How long will Lebron's next contract be?" 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, Unsigned Deadline: Start of reg season <@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>

whamapajama 2026-07-03 15:43:04 Polymarket

https://polymarket.com/event/nba-lebron-james-next-team there seems to be a contradiction in the rule set: “If LeBron James does not officially join a new team by October 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “Los Angeles Lakers”.” “If LeBron James retires or is not under contract with any professional team by October 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “Other”.” He’s a free agent, If he isn’t under contract, he won’t be on a team. The ruleset is saying that would resolve to “Other” and Lakers. Should resolve to Other <@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>

https://polymarket.com/event/nba-lebron-james-next-team there seems to be a contradiction in the rule set: “If LeBron James does not officially join a new team by October 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “Los Angeles Lakers”.” “If LeBron James retires or is not under contract with any professional team by October 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “Other”.” He’s a free agent, If he isn’t under contract, he won’t be on a team. The ruleset is saying that would resolve to “Other” and Lakers. Should resolve to Other <@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>

whamapajama 2026-07-03 04:38:41 Polymarket

You guys placed "perps" where "new" used to appear. And now access to the "new" markets is buried in the menu. I now have to scroll to the right, then access a dropdown. It's hidden from sight. That's not good for driving volume to new markets. It's harder to navigate to, i used to check all the time bc it was just one click, but now i hardly check. If you don't want to place it in the "category menu bar", one solution is to create a dropdown when you hover over "trending" (or "breaking") and you can include categories like "new" in that dropdown

You guys placed "perps" where "new" used to appear. And now access to the "new" markets is buried in the menu. I now have to scroll to the right, then access a dropdown. It's hidden from sight. That's not good for driving volume to new markets. It's harder to navigate to, i used to check all the time bc it was just one click, but now i hardly check. If you don't want to place it in the "category menu bar", one solution is to create a dropdown when you hover over "trending" (or "breaking") and you can include categories like "new" in that dropdown

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:18:19 Polymarket

if it gets DQ'd, i think it will be bc of policy carveout, not bc it's not considered a public statement

if it gets DQ'd, i think it will be bc of policy carveout, not bc it's not considered a public statement

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:14:32 Polymarket

facts, facts; untested i think

facts, facts; untested i think

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:14:12 Polymarket

come on

come on

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:14:06 Polymarket

and that I must be arguing in bad faith

and that I must be arguing in bad faith

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:13:48 Polymarket

but to say that it's not plausible that an intentional statement to a reporter is considered a "public statement"

but to say that it's not plausible that an intentional statement to a reporter is considered a "public statement"

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:13:24 Polymarket

you can contend that you don't think it should count

you can contend that you don't think it should count

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:13:01 Polymarket

and i'm posting examples of on record statements to a reporter?

and i'm posting examples of on record statements to a reporter?

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:12:39 Polymarket

i accused bad faith only in response to arbguy accusing bad faith

i accused bad faith only in response to arbguy accusing bad faith

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:11:26 Polymarket

and saying someone has no judgement as a leader is a professional attack

and saying someone has no judgement as a leader is a professional attack

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:11:08 Polymarket

judgement is a leadership trait

judgement is a leadership trait

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:10:29 Polymarket

The rules give an example of something that does qualify: “He/She isn’t smart” And something that doesn't qualify via the policy carveout: “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy” Trump's comment "he has no fucking judgement" has no limiting phrase. There is no “about this attack,” “on this issue,” “in this instance,” “here,” etc. And they more closely follow the structure of the example that counts

The rules give an example of something that does qualify: “He/She isn’t smart” And something that doesn't qualify via the policy carveout: “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy” Trump's comment "he has no fucking judgement" has no limiting phrase. There is no “about this attack,” “on this issue,” “in this instance,” “here,” etc. And they more closely follow the structure of the example that counts

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:07:29 Polymarket

we can agree to disagree

we can agree to disagree

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:06:24 Polymarket

ya, he got pissed off at bibi, then made a general insult about his competence

ya, he got pissed off at bibi, then made a general insult about his competence

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:06:08 Polymarket

that's pretty common

that's pretty common

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:06:00 Polymarket

ya, someone can get pissed off at some1 for X, and then make a general insult

ya, someone can get pissed off at some1 for X, and then make a general insult

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:05:16 Polymarket

and arguments

and arguments

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:05:09 Polymarket

you want to keep slinging insults, or do you want to stick to facts?

you want to keep slinging insults, or do you want to stick to facts?

whamapajama 2026-07-01 19:03:14 Polymarket

it's phrased as a generalized attack, maybe you're just being disingenous "he has no fucking judgement" is a general statement

it's phrased as a generalized attack, maybe you're just being disingenous "he has no fucking judgement" is a general statement

whamapajama 2026-07-01 18:59:41 Polymarket

come on

come on

whamapajama 2026-07-01 18:59:23 Polymarket

between the two of us, who is more hostile, and more likely to argue in bad faith

between the two of us, who is more hostile, and more likely to argue in bad faith

whamapajama 2026-07-01 18:57:07 Polymarket

“he has no judgment” is phrased as a generalized attack on Netanyahu’s judgment/competence, not merely “he wasn’t being smart about this strike.”

“he has no judgment” is phrased as a generalized attack on Netanyahu’s judgment/competence, not merely “he wasn’t being smart about this strike.”

whamapajama 2026-07-01 18:54:00 Polymarket

he got pissed off in reaction to X and made a broad insult, you never did that in your life?

he got pissed off in reaction to X and made a broad insult, you never did that in your life?

whamapajama 2026-07-01 18:53:42 Polymarket

he says "he has no fucking judgement" with no limiting phrase

he says "he has no fucking judgement" with no limiting phrase

whamapajama 2026-07-01 18:51:19 Polymarket

You're helping my case The market rules provide an example of something that DOES count: e.g., “He/She isn’t smart.” The market rules provide an example of something that DOESN’T count: e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy.” (under the policy carveout rule) In the non-qualifying “He isn’t being smart about this policy,” the phrase “about this policy” narrows the criticism. It tells us the criticism is limited to a particular subject. But in Trump’s statement of “He has no f**king judgement,” there is no equivalent limiting phrase. There is no “about this attack,” “on this issue,” “in this instance,” “here,” etc. Trump says “He has no f**king judgement” which follows the structure of the ruleset-provided example that DOES count. Again, there is no limiting phrase.

You're helping my case The market rules provide an example of something that DOES count: e.g., “He/She isn’t smart.” The market rules provide an example of something that DOESN’T count: e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy.” (under the policy carveout rule) In the non-qualifying “He isn’t being smart about this policy,” the phrase “about this policy” narrows the criticism. It tells us the criticism is limited to a particular subject. But in Trump’s statement of “He has no f**king judgement,” there is no equivalent limiting phrase. There is no “about this attack,” “on this issue,” “in this instance,” “here,” etc. Trump says “He has no f**king judgement” which follows the structure of the ruleset-provided example that DOES count. Again, there is no limiting phrase.

whamapajama 2026-07-01 18:50:25 Polymarket

If you observe ice cream falling on Bibi’s face as he eats an ice cream cone upside down, when you say “why would you eat ice cream upside down? You have no fucking judgement” You’re making a broad statement that Bibi has “no fxxking judgement”, not a narrow statement about how he has “no f**king judgement” just when it comes to eating ice cream.

If you observe ice cream falling on Bibi’s face as he eats an ice cream cone upside down, when you say “why would you eat ice cream upside down? You have no fucking judgement” You’re making a broad statement that Bibi has “no fxxking judgement”, not a narrow statement about how he has “no f**king judgement” just when it comes to eating ice cream.

whamapajama 2026-07-01 18:49:47 Polymarket

trigger event, broad insult

trigger event, broad insult

whamapajama 2026-07-01 18:49:38 Polymarket

That is the Netanyahu structure. The Beirut strike is the triggering event. The insult is the claim that Netanyahu lacks judgment.

That is the Netanyahu structure. The Beirut strike is the triggering event. The insult is the claim that Netanyahu lacks judgment.

whamapajama 2026-07-01 18:49:30 Polymarket

If a friend says, “That restaurant was a bad pick,” that is criticism of the choice. If the friend says, “You have no judgment,” that is a personal dig.

If a friend says, “That restaurant was a bad pick,” that is criticism of the choice. If the friend says, “You have no judgment,” that is a personal dig.

whamapajama 2026-07-01 18:49:16 Polymarket

If a sports fan says, “That play call was bad,” that is about the play. If they say, “The coach has no judgment,” that is a professional attack on the coach.

If a sports fan says, “That play call was bad,” that is about the play. If they say, “The coach has no judgment,” that is a professional attack on the coach.

← 上一页 第 1 / 5 页 下一页 →