Polymarketyou wish you sold more, sure you didnt lose on net but even dumber flippers did
you wish you sold more, sure you didnt lose on net but even dumber flippers did
yo参与话题 6消息总数 136
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 136 条，显示第 51-100 条curious
curious
damn its exactly what I said
damn its exactly what I said
and your mad
and your mad
my goal was to make low life flippers lose
my goal was to make low life flippers lose
read my log
read my log
me
me
gg
gg
I REALLY TRIED TO SAVE YALL <@260071956177485834> <@904860175196901436> <@353539148507774977> <@1348003493713023117>
I REALLY TRIED TO SAVE YALL <@260071956177485834> <@904860175196901436> <@353539148507774977> <@1348003493713023117>
zedi did not play, Poor Rangers did and they have a connection to the name Zedi despite no longer using the name. thats all the rules care about.
zedi did not play, Poor Rangers did and they have a connection to the name Zedi despite no longer using the name. thats all the rules care about.
your mad I called out your bad flip, you didnt do your research and now you look dumb
your mad I called out your bad flip, you didnt do your research and now you look dumb
what do you call it when one team goes by one name and then later another?
what do you call it when one team goes by one name and then later another?
roster was publicly listed and unchanged the whole time
roster was publicly listed and unchanged the whole time
there was no roster change
there was no roster change
all that matters is that there is a reasonable connection to only one team in the tournament
all that matters is that there is a reasonable connection to only one team in the tournament
"Saying the team does not currently use the Zedi name (true but does not meet the new requirements for 50 - 50)" the fact that they stopped using the name (or when) does not matter
"Saying the team does not currently use the Zedi name (true but does not meet the new requirements for 50 - 50)" the fact that they stopped using the name (or when) does not matter
read my argument, it has nothing to due with when the change happened
read my argument, it has nothing to due with when the change happened
Time of creation has no bearing to the actual rules
Time of creation has no bearing to the actual rules
P1 - GL won the game and the market should resolve to GL The team now known as Poor Rangers originally registered for Esports World Cup as Zedi Esports. It is clearly the same team as they are both marked as being the sole entrant to qualify from the eastern European qualifier tournament and share the exact same roster. Sources: https://web.archive.org/web/20260619035736/https://esportsworldcup.com/en/competitions/2026/dota2#participating_clubs (archive of the official tournament site) https://saiganak.com/event/esportsworldcup-2026-schedule-week1/ https://egamersworld.com/blog/dota-2-esports-world-cup-2026-overview-zmyff8JY-T (articles from the time listing the qualifiers) The rules state: "If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50" In this case the competition listed in the rules is "This market refers to the Dota 2 match between ZEDI Esports and GamerLegion in the Esports World Cup Group A, initially scheduled for July 7 at 5:00AM ET." To argue for 50 - 50 either the name used by the team to register for the tournament they are currently playing in has no reasonable connection to the team, or that Zedi Esports could reasonably refer to another team in the Esports World Cup Dota 2 Group A or possibly the full Dota 2 tournament. Both of these arguments are clearly grasping at straws, P3 voters are mostly either spreading missinfo about another Indian Dota 2 team under the Zedi name (does not exist), Saying the team does not currently use the Zedi name (true but does not meet the new requirements for 50 - 50) or pointing towards "president" without providing a comparable example (the one example given has 2 teams with similar names, meeting the ambiguity clause not met here).
P1 - GL won the game and the market should resolve to GL The team now known as Poor Rangers originally registered for Esports World Cup as Zedi Esports. It is clearly the same team as they are both marked as being the sole entrant to qualify from the eastern European qualifier tournament and share the exact same roster. Sources: https://web.archive.org/web/20260619035736/https://esportsworldcup.com/en/competitions/2026/dota2#participating_clubs (archive of the official tournament site) https://saiganak.com/event/esportsworldcup-2026-schedule-week1/ https://egamersworld.com/blog/dota-2-esports-world-cup-2026-overview-zmyff8JY-T (articles from the time listing the qualifiers) The rules state: "If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50" In this case the competition listed in the rules is "This market refers to the Dota 2 match between ZEDI Esports and GamerLegion in the Esports World Cup Group A, initially scheduled for July 7 at 5:00AM ET." To argue for 50 - 50 either the name used by the team to register for the tournament they are currently playing in has no reasonable connection to the team, or that Zedi Esports could reasonably refer to another team in the Esports World Cup Dota 2 Group A or possibly the full Dota 2 tournament. Both of these arguments are clearly grasping at straws, P3 voters are mostly either spreading missinfo about another Indian Dota 2 team under the Zedi name (does not exist), Saying the team does not currently use the Zedi name (true but does not meet the new requirements for 50 - 50) or pointing towards "president" without providing a comparable example (the one example given has 2 teams with similar names, meeting the ambiguity clause not met here).
its the exact same roster, stop lying to manipulate people
its the exact same roster, stop lying to manipulate people
I said last message but this is a genuine question, after registration and the group A on EWC site listed the team as Zedi, but before the first match
I said last message but this is a genuine question, after registration and the group A on EWC site listed the team as Zedi, but before the first match
Last message i'm sending in this channel, catch me in the dispute chats. they registered under the zedi name and then changed after the deal fell through, I never changed my story once.
Last message i'm sending in this channel, catch me in the dispute chats. they registered under the zedi name and then changed after the deal fell through, I never changed my story once.
post from 2 days ago, obviously again after the name change
post from 2 days ago, obviously again after the name change
thats the old old name
thats the old old name
not power rangers
not power rangers
poor rangers
poor rangers
my point exactly
my point exactly
name went from power rangers > zedi > poor rangers. no "power rangers" in EWC
name went from power rangers > zedi > poor rangers. no "power rangers" in EWC
true, but they originally registered as Zedi esports
true, but they originally registered as Zedi esports
what other EWC dota2 team is zedi esports?
what other EWC dota2 team is zedi esports?
are you arguing a differnt team somehow won the eastern Europe qualifier months after instead of a name change?
are you arguing a differnt team somehow won the eastern Europe qualifier months after instead of a name change?
new name
new name
old name
old name
its the same team
its the same team
its not hard
its not hard
that they are the 1 team qualified through the Eastern Europe qualifier
that they are the 1 team qualified through the Eastern Europe qualifier
what do you call it when the EWC site has one name listed for a team and then a differnt name for the same team
what do you call it when the EWC site has one name listed for a team and then a differnt name for the same team
actually 0 change
actually 0 change
has nothing to do with the other market
has nothing to do with the other market
i tried to save yall, make your bets and wait for UMA to see if they have a 100 + average IQ
i tried to save yall, make your bets and wait for UMA to see if they have a 100 + average IQ
wow the markets added after the name change have the new name, who would have thought
wow the markets added after the name change have the new name, who would have thought
also most likely is fail dispute
also most likely is fail dispute
they displayed the 0-2 score, could easily go refund
they displayed the 0-2 score, could easily go refund
cant play chess with a pigeon
cant play chess with a pigeon
so are they
so are they
except there obviously is people re talking about a potential dispute right now
except there obviously is people re talking about a potential dispute right now
its orders of magnitude smaller
its orders of magnitude smaller
do you seriously believe EWC is in the same tier as the world cup?
do you seriously believe EWC is in the same tier as the world cup?
why would EWC be treated any differnt from similar size tournaments
why would EWC be treated any differnt from similar size tournaments
but saying EWC and pointing to WC because they have a simlar name is retarded
but saying EWC and pointing to WC because they have a simlar name is retarded