So what even is the issue I thought they updated the rules to include different names
So what even is the issue I thought they updated the rules to include different names
2026-07-08 · Polymarket · 92 条相关讨论
So what even is the issue I thought they updated the rules to include different names
So what even is the issue I thought they updated the rules to include different names
its not same team
its not same team
Is it the first game they played under this wrong name?
Is it the first game they played under this wrong name?
so this can resolve as the game was between PR and Gl, but the moneylines, gamelines are 50 - 50? Can they do that?
so this can resolve as the game was between PR and Gl, but the moneylines, gamelines are 50 - 50? Can they do that?
I think it all needs to go one way
I think it all needs to go one way
i tried to save yall, make your bets and wait for UMA to see if they have a 100 + average IQ
i tried to save yall, make your bets and wait for UMA to see if they have a 100 + average IQ
explain this <@535590540482314262>
explain this <@535590540482314262>
what do you call it when the EWC site has one name listed for a team and then a differnt name for the same team
what do you call it when the EWC site has one name listed for a team and then a differnt name for the same team
and how do you connect those 2 teams?
and how do you connect those 2 teams?
that they are the 1 team qualified through the Eastern Europe qualifier
that they are the 1 team qualified through the Eastern Europe qualifier
in the last 6 months the rules were like that: 50/50 only applies when the name references another team already in the competition. This is the point. That's not the case here. In most past cases with this kind of name discrepancy on the same slot, it resolved 0/100. Same slot, same players, same match, just a little correlation is enough. (When ZEDI was mentioned on the official site and on egamersworld, they were referring to Poor Rangers. This is enough).
in the last 6 months the rules were like that: 50/50 only applies when the name references another team already in the competition. This is the point. That's not the case here. In most past cases with this kind of name discrepancy on the same slot, it resolved 0/100. Same slot, same players, same match, just a little correlation is enough. (When ZEDI was mentioned on the official site and on egamersworld, they were referring to Poor Rangers. This is enough).
there is no official team for Zedi, this was a mistake by EWC
there is no official team for Zedi, this was a mistake by EWC
ZEDI Esports its another team which is not connected to Power Rangers/Poor Rangers Why you cant understand that. Its the same for market Ronaldo will cry. But I was crying. Two different persons, two different teams.
ZEDI Esports its another team which is not connected to Power Rangers/Poor Rangers Why you cant understand that. Its the same for market Ronaldo will cry. But I was crying. Two different persons, two different teams.
what other EWC dota2 team is zedi esports?
what other EWC dota2 team is zedi esports?
ZEDI esports never qualified for EWC. It was power rangers. The name got listed as ZEDI because of the supposed sponsor change, but that deal fell through. But the fact that EWC has a separate qualifiers and it was power rangers that qualified, and then theis same team's name was changed to ZEDI, makes it clear this matchup only refers to GL vs Power Rangers. If it resolves otherway then yall are just getting scammed
ZEDI esports never qualified for EWC. It was power rangers. The name got listed as ZEDI because of the supposed sponsor change, but that deal fell through. But the fact that EWC has a separate qualifiers and it was power rangers that qualified, and then theis same team's name was changed to ZEDI, makes it clear this matchup only refers to GL vs Power Rangers. If it resolves otherway then yall are just getting scammed
name went from power rangers > zedi > poor rangers. no "power rangers" in EWC
name went from power rangers > zedi > poor rangers. no "power rangers" in EWC
The fact is only teams that qualify make it to the EWC and it was Power rangers that qualified. And then that team's name got changed somewhere in the mess
The fact is only teams that qualify make it to the EWC and it was Power rangers that qualified. And then that team's name got changed somewhere in the mess
power rangers = zedi esports = poor ranger Referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. just a little correlation needed. The most important thing is that it cannot be confused with other teams in the competition. This has already been proven in many cases.
power rangers = zedi esports = poor ranger Referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. just a little correlation needed. The most important thing is that it cannot be confused with other teams in the competition. This has already been proven in many cases.
Last message i'm sending in this channel, catch me in the dispute chats. they registered under the zedi name and then changed after the deal fell through, I never changed my story once.
Last message i'm sending in this channel, catch me in the dispute chats. they registered under the zedi name and then changed after the deal fell through, I never changed my story once.
If an article makes some kind of a clarification you'd still say there's no reasonable connection between the two? Quit scamming.
If an article makes some kind of a clarification you'd still say there's no reasonable connection between the two? Quit scamming.
I don't mix it, the fact that the official website mixed it is enough. Trust me. When Polymarket created the market, the provider relied on that. You can't take advantage of Polymarket's mistakes...
I don't mix it, the fact that the official website mixed it is enough. Trust me. When Polymarket created the market, the provider relied on that. You can't take advantage of Polymarket's mistakes...
Rule: Referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition = Just a little correlation needed. Trust me, it's not a 50/50 deal for things like this, unless it's referring to another team in the competition. When Polymarket creates a market with a provider, it doesn't create it randomly, there's an assigned team slots. So, in most cases, the correlation is already there
Rule: Referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition = Just a little correlation needed. Trust me, it's not a 50/50 deal for things like this, unless it's referring to another team in the competition. When Polymarket creates a market with a provider, it doesn't create it randomly, there's an assigned team slots. So, in most cases, the correlation is already there
Simple rule - if Dotabuff match name doesnt match 1:1 with polymarket match name, dont bet. Saves you hell lotta headache
Simple rule - if Dotabuff match name doesnt match 1:1 with polymarket match name, dont bet. Saves you hell lotta headache
50/50 for all because its just a rumor team LOL, it not exist , hope poly give a refund
50/50 for all because its just a rumor team LOL, it not exist , hope poly give a refund
100-0 Because you have NO
100-0 Because you have NO
its like a cancel game bro , no game was played with these 2 team
its like a cancel game bro , no game was played with these 2 team
read rules
read rules
if ZEDI Esports wins the series , but did Zedi Esports play dota2? XD
if ZEDI Esports wins the series , but did Zedi Esports play dota2? XD
No is neg i think but can’t be 50-50 according to rules anyway, can’t convert my no
No is neg i think but can’t be 50-50 according to rules anyway, can’t convert my no
https://polymarket.com/ru/esports/dota-2/esports-world-cup/dota2-zedies-gl-2026-07-07 it is bug? GL win 2-0 and How could the outcome be any different?
https://polymarket.com/ru/esports/dota-2/esports-world-cup/dota2-zedies-gl-2026-07-07 it is bug? GL win 2-0 and How could the outcome be any different?
50 - 50 it is
50 - 50 it is
Bet on Zedi here I bet almost 100k on zedi at that markets
Bet on Zedi here I bet almost 100k on zedi at that markets
IMO that market should be refunded fully because its PM's mistake of not changing the correct team names before the start of actual EWC However, the ZEDI they have mentioned in the slug only refers to Poor rangers (Power rangers) and no other team, because ZEDI (an indian team) by themselves never qualified for EWC, and Polymarket added the GL vs ZEDI event from EWC pages only because Power rangers name was changed to ZEDI in light of their sponsorship/aquistition , so PM created the event GL vs ZEDI. This ZEDI is nothing but power rangers, who qualified from Eeaster european EWC qualifiers.
IMO that market should be refunded fully because its PM's mistake of not changing the correct team names before the start of actual EWC However, the ZEDI they have mentioned in the slug only refers to Poor rangers (Power rangers) and no other team, because ZEDI (an indian team) by themselves never qualified for EWC, and Polymarket added the GL vs ZEDI event from EWC pages only because Power rangers name was changed to ZEDI in light of their sponsorship/aquistition , so PM created the event GL vs ZEDI. This ZEDI is nothing but power rangers, who qualified from Eeaster european EWC qualifiers.
Archive page shows zedi qualified from Eastern Europe. But "zedi" is an indian team, why does it show as Eastern europe here?
Archive page shows zedi qualified from Eastern Europe. But "zedi" is an indian team, why does it show as Eastern europe here?
This has the same value as a team that withdrew and another took the place
This has the same value as a team that withdrew and another took the place
it is 0-100 guys, the same was a lot of times at cs2
it is 0-100 guys, the same was a lot of times at cs2
Today I find they didn;t play and Poor Rangers played instead
Today I find they didn;t play and Poor Rangers played instead
Its the same team that qualified which then got changed to zedi as seen even in EWC websites archive. I suppose PM added this market when EWC website showed it as zedi vs GL. And now that same team is changed to poor rangers. Its the same team that qualified from eastern europa qualfiers of EWC
Its the same team that qualified which then got changed to zedi as seen even in EWC websites archive. I suppose PM added this market when EWC website showed it as zedi vs GL. And now that same team is changed to poor rangers. Its the same team that qualified from eastern europa qualfiers of EWC
If Real Madrid changes the team name to Barcelona then changes back to Real Madrid, on the next match will be called Barcelona!? What is that logic?
If Real Madrid changes the team name to Barcelona then changes back to Real Madrid, on the next match will be called Barcelona!? What is that logic?
It's a clear mistake by Polymarket thats why it goes to 50-50
It's a clear mistake by Polymarket thats why it goes to 50-50
PM clearly added the market when EWC own website listed Zedi as the team's name. Stop trying to scam
PM clearly added the market when EWC own website listed Zedi as the team's name. Stop trying to scam
There is no other team that qualified from Eastern European qualfiers except power rangers
There is no other team that qualified from Eastern European qualfiers except power rangers
As per the rules its the same team. PM probably added this market it when EWC website said its Zedi who are in the EWC finals. The same team from Eastern European qualifiers
As per the rules its the same team. PM probably added this market it when EWC website said its Zedi who are in the EWC finals. The same team from Eastern European qualifiers
yea but something changed and thats not the team, mistakes like that can happen
yea but something changed and thats not the team, mistakes like that can happen
as per the rules the market, in theory, should go 50/50 that thats bullshit for people that bet on GL is obvious
as per the rules the market, in theory, should go 50/50 that thats bullshit for people that bet on GL is obvious
Fairs so Im just saying the fair resolution here is 50 50 and a refund for those who bet on GL
Fairs so Im just saying the fair resolution here is 50 50 and a refund for those who bet on GL
it is what it is , 50/50
it is what it is , 50/50
And this is also the snapshot of the official site https://web.archive.org/web/20260619035736/https://esportsworldcup.com/en/competitions/2026/dota2#qualifiers It clearlty shows zedi listed as the team that qualified from Eastern Europe
And this is also the snapshot of the official site https://web.archive.org/web/20260619035736/https://esportsworldcup.com/en/competitions/2026/dota2#qualifiers It clearlty shows zedi listed as the team that qualified from Eastern Europe
Why is ZEDI ESPORTS even listed here, unless its the same team referring to Power rangers (who qualified from eastern europe)
Why is ZEDI ESPORTS even listed here, unless its the same team referring to Power rangers (who qualified from eastern europe)
<@1272383282687905939> <@1402701322775695391> <@584169336596594699> Hello so is anybody looking into this? or leaving it to uma
<@1272383282687905939> <@1402701322775695391> <@584169336596594699> Hello so is anybody looking into this? or leaving it to uma
funny how the market was trading normally before and during the game, how did all these traders know that ZEDI Esports and Poor rangers are the same team if there supposedly isnt any connection, hmmm.... I wonder
funny how the market was trading normally before and during the game, how did all these traders know that ZEDI Esports and Poor rangers are the same team if there supposedly isnt any connection, hmmm.... I wonder
its the exact same roster, stop lying to manipulate people
its the exact same roster, stop lying to manipulate people
Guys Just one point which can destroy your web archive You give as https://web.archive.org/web/20260619035736/https://esportsworldcup.com/en/competitions/2026/dota2#participating_clubs Its 19.06.2026 seems like at link we have also time 03:57:36 My link: https://web.archive.org/web/20260630182153/https://esportsworldcup.com/en/competitions/2026/dota2#qualifiers its 30.06.2026 time 18:21:53 Time of creating MoneyLine is Market Opened :Jun 30, 2026, 8:40 PM ET I will save your time with google its 1st july at night.
Guys Just one point which can destroy your web archive You give as https://web.archive.org/web/20260619035736/https://esportsworldcup.com/en/competitions/2026/dota2#participating_clubs Its 19.06.2026 seems like at link we have also time 03:57:36 My link: https://web.archive.org/web/20260630182153/https://esportsworldcup.com/en/competitions/2026/dota2#qualifiers its 30.06.2026 time 18:21:53 Time of creating MoneyLine is Market Opened :Jun 30, 2026, 8:40 PM ET I will save your time with google its 1st july at night.
P1 - GL won the game and the market should resolve to GL The team now known as Poor Rangers originally registered for Esports World Cup as Zedi Esports. It is clearly the same team as they are both marked as being the sole entrant to qualify from the eastern European qualifier tournament and share the exact same roster. Sources: https://web.archive.org/web/20260619035736/https://esportsworldcup.com/en/competitions/2026/dota2#participating_clubs (archive of the official tournament site) https://saiganak.com/event/esportsworldcup-2026-schedule-week1/ https://egamersworld.com/blog/dota-2-esports-world-cup-2026-overview-zmyff8JY-T (articles from the time listing the qualifiers) The rules state: "If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50" In this case the competition listed in the rules is "This market refers to the Dota 2 match between ZEDI Esports and GamerLegion in the Esports World Cup Group A, initially scheduled for July 7 at 5:00AM ET." To argue for 50 - 50 either the name used by the team to register for the tournament they are currently playing in has no reasonable connection to the team, or that Zedi Esports could reasonably refer to another team in the Esports World Cup Dota 2 Group A or possibly the full Dota 2 tournament. Both of these arguments are clearly grasping at straws, P3 voters are mostly either spreading missinfo about another Indian Dota 2 team under the Zedi name (does not exist), Saying the team does not currently use the Zedi name (true but does not meet the new requirements for 50 - 50) or pointing towards "president" without providing a comparable example (the one example given has 2 teams with similar names, meeting the ambiguity clause not met here).
P1 - GL won the game and the market should resolve to GL The team now known as Poor Rangers originally registered for Esports World Cup as Zedi Esports. It is clearly the same team as they are both marked as being the sole entrant to qualify from the eastern European qualifier tournament and share the exact same roster. Sources: https://web.archive.org/web/20260619035736/https://esportsworldcup.com/en/competitions/2026/dota2#participating_clubs (archive of the official tournament site) https://saiganak.com/event/esportsworldcup-2026-schedule-week1/ https://egamersworld.com/blog/dota-2-esports-world-cup-2026-overview-zmyff8JY-T (articles from the time listing the qualifiers) The rules state: "If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50" In this case the competition listed in the rules is "This market refers to the Dota 2 match between ZEDI Esports and GamerLegion in the Esports World Cup Group A, initially scheduled for July 7 at 5:00AM ET." To argue for 50 - 50 either the name used by the team to register for the tournament they are currently playing in has no reasonable connection to the team, or that Zedi Esports could reasonably refer to another team in the Esports World Cup Dota 2 Group A or possibly the full Dota 2 tournament. Both of these arguments are clearly grasping at straws, P3 voters are mostly either spreading missinfo about another Indian Dota 2 team under the Zedi name (does not exist), Saying the team does not currently use the Zedi name (true but does not meet the new requirements for 50 - 50) or pointing towards "president" without providing a comparable example (the one example given has 2 teams with similar names, meeting the ambiguity clause not met here).
Time of creation has no bearing to the actual rules
Time of creation has no bearing to the actual rules
Your argument with webarchive was destroyed
Your argument with webarchive was destroyed
read my argument, it has nothing to due with when the change happened
read my argument, it has nothing to due with when the change happened
"Saying the team does not currently use the Zedi name (true but does not meet the new requirements for 50 - 50)" the fact that they stopped using the name (or when) does not matter
"Saying the team does not currently use the Zedi name (true but does not meet the new requirements for 50 - 50)" the fact that they stopped using the name (or when) does not matter
all that matters is that there is a reasonable connection to only one team in the tournament
all that matters is that there is a reasonable connection to only one team in the tournament
The roster never changed
The roster never changed
Facts are: 1. The same team poor/power rangers were in discussion with ZEDI about sponsor/acquistition. This is confirmed by the Power Ranger team's own coach. 2. EWC website had the same team as ZEDI at multiple snapshots in June, as EWC Eastern Europe qualifier winners 3. In late june this was changed back to poor rangers, but its the same team because there is only one eastern europe qualifiers and that team was only in discussion with ZEDI (point 1) So its the same team. There is absolutely no logic in saying this power rangers and ZEDI refer to different team. The team's own coach stating they were discussing aquistition but it broke down clearly proves this.
Facts are: 1. The same team poor/power rangers were in discussion with ZEDI about sponsor/acquistition. This is confirmed by the Power Ranger team's own coach. 2. EWC website had the same team as ZEDI at multiple snapshots in June, as EWC Eastern Europe qualifier winners 3. In late june this was changed back to poor rangers, but its the same team because there is only one eastern europe qualifiers and that team was only in discussion with ZEDI (point 1) So its the same team. There is absolutely no logic in saying this power rangers and ZEDI refer to different team. The team's own coach stating they were discussing aquistition but it broke down clearly proves this.
this is basically open and shut at this point, same team was discussing to change their name to ZEDI, and then the negotiation broke down and they decided to play with old name poor rangers without the ZEDI organization
this is basically open and shut at this point, same team was discussing to change their name to ZEDI, and then the negotiation broke down and they decided to play with old name poor rangers without the ZEDI organization
I will help with the rules if needed <@1212792946341183578>
I will help with the rules if needed <@1212792946341183578>
zedi did not play, Poor Rangers did and they have a connection to the name Zedi despite no longer using the name. thats all the rules care about.
zedi did not play, Poor Rangers did and they have a connection to the name Zedi despite no longer using the name. thats all the rules care about.
<@1361217824776786031> hey sir, we need a clarification, this will set a precedent for all esports, it is that important. i don't want to be cucked if im betting high stakes, PLEASE, contact market team and fix this
<@1361217824776786031> hey sir, we need a clarification, this will set a precedent for all esports, it is that important. i don't want to be cucked if im betting high stakes, PLEASE, contact market team and fix this
I don't really understand the arguments for a 50-50 resolution. The very sources being cited to support 50-50 actually confirm there was a connection between ZEDI and the roster that ultimately played as Poor Rangers
I don't really understand the arguments for a 50-50 resolution. The very sources being cited to support 50-50 actually confirm there was a connection between ZEDI and the roster that ultimately played as Poor Rangers
Yeah, I really don't get it, how somebody can use it for 50-50 resolution as it cleary said that there is connection between ZEDI and the Poor Rangers roster xD
Yeah, I really don't get it, how somebody can use it for 50-50 resolution as it cleary said that there is connection between ZEDI and the Poor Rangers roster xD
Books not cleared?
Books not cleared?
good clarif, orderbook cleared like 10 minutes before the clarif
good clarif, orderbook cleared like 10 minutes before the clarif
GUYS
GUYS
CLEAR THE BOOKS
CLEAR THE BOOKS
CLEAR THE BOOKS
CLEAR THE BOOKS
Real-world rules exist to prevent this 50/50 nonsense. You were fully aware of what you were doing when you bought ZEDI; don't play the victim now.
Real-world rules exist to prevent this 50/50 nonsense. You were fully aware of what you were doing when you bought ZEDI; don't play the victim now.
they did but then the clarification came late again, no idea how they keep fucking up
they did but then the clarification came late again, no idea how they keep fucking up
Lel i had feeling they would claeify this they showed they prefer this type of resolution
Lel i had feeling they would claeify this they showed they prefer this type of resolution
Order books did not clear
Order books did not clear
RULECUCKERS LOSE, SPIRIT OF THE MARKET PREVAILS
RULECUCKERS LOSE, SPIRIT OF THE MARKET PREVAILS
I REALLY TRIED TO SAVE YALL <@260071956177485834> <@904860175196901436> <@353539148507774977> <@1348003493713023117>
I REALLY TRIED TO SAVE YALL <@260071956177485834> <@904860175196901436> <@353539148507774977> <@1348003493713023117>
SCAM FUCKERS DOWNNNNNNN
SCAM FUCKERS DOWNNNNNNN
This is the official response from Polymarket, so the settlement will not be 50-50.
This is the official response from Polymarket, so the settlement will not be 50-50.
yo chill, all the new guys here acting big tough, but if this game happened 3 months ago it would be 50-50 no question asked, thats why so many OGs here were on that side
yo chill, all the new guys here acting big tough, but if this game happened 3 months ago it would be 50-50 no question asked, thats why so many OGs here were on that side
I said my opinion about this market to people who dmed me, there was a high chance for this type of clarification, trying to ride it to 50c was just greed
I said my opinion about this market to people who dmed me, there was a high chance for this type of clarification, trying to ride it to 50c was just greed
I've encountered this situation once before, where the settlement wasn't 50-50. I've only experienced this once, so I can't be sure if most markets use a 50-50 settlement in this scenario.
I've encountered this situation once before, where the settlement wasn't 50-50. I've only experienced this once, so I can't be sure if most markets use a 50-50 settlement in this scenario.
What is this? Bosaurum didnt train the newhire?
What is this? Bosaurum didnt train the newhire?
For me scam is to add Additional context after the event ended.
For me scam is to add Additional context after the event ended.
<@260071956177485834> Hey man and OTHER FUCKING SCAMMERS. GL WON 2-0. And polymarket did the right decision
<@260071956177485834> Hey man and OTHER FUCKING SCAMMERS. GL WON 2-0. And polymarket did the right decision
I hope u gonna die in the hell because u r literally scammer. I hate scam. U r fucking disrespectful DOGS
I hope u gonna die in the hell because u r literally scammer. I hate scam. U r fucking disrespectful DOGS
Wait what was the resolution finally?
Wait what was the resolution finally?
> This event and its underlying markets will resolve based on the Dota 2 Esports World Cup Group A match between Poor Rangers and GamerLegion. > > The Esports World Cup official participant listing initially named this Group A slot "ZEDI Esports" and later updated it to "Poor Rangers"; the playing roster is unchanged. The team listed as "ZEDI Esports" in this event is the same competitive entity that competed in this match under the "Poor Rangers" (PR) tag. > Aahahahaha So many idiots were telling me zedi was some idndian team 😂
> This event and its underlying markets will resolve based on the Dota 2 Esports World Cup Group A match between Poor Rangers and GamerLegion. > > The Esports World Cup official participant listing initially named this Group A slot "ZEDI Esports" and later updated it to "Poor Rangers"; the playing roster is unchanged. The team listed as "ZEDI Esports" in this event is the same competitive entity that competed in this match under the "Poor Rangers" (PR) tag. > Aahahahaha So many idiots were telling me zedi was some idndian team 😂
Guys who were scamming should be banned of the platform, period. Lots of UMA voters outed themselves
Guys who were scamming should be banned of the platform, period. Lots of UMA voters outed themselves
only reason they clarified this way is because lil bro would have went broke
only reason they clarified this way is because lil bro would have went broke
u are lucky cause if polymarket admit its they fault they will have to pay extra money
u are lucky cause if polymarket admit its they fault they will have to pay extra money