聊天记录
共 2 条，显示第 1-2 条
https://polymarket.com/ko/sports/fifa-friendlies/fif-eqg-com-2026-06-08
Something Wrong..
The actual result is a 1:0 win for Comoros. But in the Polymarket, it was marked as a 1:0 win for Equatorial Guinea. But the real question is, I bet on Draw-no, why was it processed as $0.
It was said that the postponed game, which was not canceled despite the game rules, would maintain the market, but the game did not even start, but the market was arbitrarily closed.
check plz.
https://polymarket.com/ko/sports/fifa-friendlies/fif-eqg-com-2026-06-08
Something Wrong..
The actual result is a 1:0 win for Comoros. But in the Polymarket, it was marked as a 1:0 win for Equatorial Guinea. But the real question is, I bet on Draw-no, why was it processed as $0.
It was said that the postponed game, which was not canceled despite the game rules, would maintain the market, but the game did not even start, but the market was arbitrarily closed.
check plz.
market resolution dispute — wrong resolution on a completed match
Market: Equatorial Guinea vs Comoros — “Will the game end in a draw?”
The issue: this market resolved YES under the cancellation clause (“If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game → Yes”). But the game was NOT canceled — it was postponed one day and played to completion.
Official result: Equatorial Guinea 0 – 1 Comoros, FINISHED, 9 June 2026, 18:30 (Int. Friendly, goal Zaydou Youssouf 90’). Verifiable on Sofascore / ESPN (screenshot attached).
Per the rules:
• “If postponed → market remains open until completed” — the game was postponed (June 8 → June 9), then completed.
• “Draw → Yes, otherwise → No” — 0–1 is not a draw, so this must resolve NO.
The YES resolution directly contradicts the official final result. Requesting the market be re-resolved / emergency-resolved to NO and DRAW NO holders credited. Could you also confirm what clarification (if any) was posted via the bulletin board 0x69c47De9D4D3Dad79590d61b9e05918E03775f24 to justify the YES outcome?
Attaching: Sofascore final result, resolution rules, and June 9 reschedule evidence. Thanks 🙏
market resolution dispute — wrong resolution on a completed match
Market: Equatorial Guinea vs Comoros — “Will the game end in a draw?”
The issue: this market resolved YES under the cancellation clause (“If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game → Yes”). But the game was NOT canceled — it was postponed one day and played to completion.
Official result: Equatorial Guinea 0 – 1 Comoros, FINISHED, 9 June 2026, 18:30 (Int. Friendly, goal Zaydou Youssouf 90’). Verifiable on Sofascore / ESPN (screenshot attached).
Per the rules:
• “If postponed → market remains open until completed” — the game was postponed (June 8 → June 9), then completed.
• “Draw → Yes, otherwise → No” — 0–1 is not a draw, so this must resolve NO.
The YES resolution directly contradicts the official final result. Requesting the market be re-resolved / emergency-resolved to NO and DRAW NO holders credited. Could you also confirm what clarification (if any) was posted via the bulletin board 0x69c47De9D4D3Dad79590d61b9e05918E03775f24 to justify the YES outcome?
Attaching: Sofascore final result, resolution rules, and June 9 reschedule evidence. Thanks 🙏
Polymarket