Nah don't mind him, he is a rage bater. Focus on calling out PMs bullshit
Nah don't mind him, he is a rage bater. Focus on calling out PMs bullshit
该用户的聊天记录定位。
Nah don't mind him, he is a rage bater. Focus on calling out PMs bullshit
Nah don't mind him, he is a rage bater. Focus on calling out PMs bullshit
I can't understand people that are defending Polymarket, okay, you bought NO, good for you. No one cares. All I care about is a fair "marketplace". I don't want last minute rule bending. Nemo if you don't have anything to add to the discussion I don't know what are you going on about 🙂 You bought NO and won 10 bucks? Good for you. No one cares.
I can't understand people that are defending Polymarket, okay, you bought NO, good for you. No one cares. All I care about is a fair "marketplace". I don't want last minute rule bending. Nemo if you don't have anything to add to the discussion I don't know what are you going on about 🙂 You bought NO and won 10 bucks? Good for you. No one cares.
They bend the rules however it fits them
They bend the rules however it fits them
https://x.com/community_fist/status/2062247878819790996
https://x.com/community_fist/status/2062247878819790996
So is there going to be a market for "Polymarket getting sued by ___ ?"
So is there going to be a market for "Polymarket getting sued by ___ ?"
This is not much better than playing slots or roulette. The house always wins. They rake in fees while bending the rules however they want.
This is not much better than playing slots or roulette. The house always wins. They rake in fees while bending the rules however they want.
"Is the sky purple?" -Resolves to yes *CLARIFICATION* I meant blue.
"Is the sky purple?" -Resolves to yes *CLARIFICATION* I meant blue.
"markets intent" 10 minutes ago you said that the clarifications are up to "vibes"
"markets intent" 10 minutes ago you said that the clarifications are up to "vibes"
Answer the question please
Answer the question please
You're defending your position, understandable. But if someone had a gun to your head and asked "Did Microstrategy sell any Bitcoin by May 31st 2026?" what is your answer going to be?
You're defending your position, understandable. But if someone had a gun to your head and asked "Did Microstrategy sell any Bitcoin by May 31st 2026?" what is your answer going to be?
Because someone internally had interest in resolving it early 🙂
Because someone internally had interest in resolving it early 🙂
Exactly that's what I'm saying.
Exactly that's what I'm saying.
Even the market reacted to that.
Even the market reacted to that.
There weren't any rules that the sell needed to be confirmed. Those were added post factum.
There weren't any rules that the sell needed to be confirmed. Those were added post factum.
If Strategy posts their positions every monday then from the past Monday it should've been 99.9 on NO.
If Strategy posts their positions every monday then from the past Monday it should've been 99.9 on NO.
As <@1034771491436363797> said it was not a coinflip. It was 82% YES, not a 50/50. After Polymarkets decision to intervene and manipulate the market with their additional context/clarification Yes went to 0.1%
As <@1034771491436363797> said it was not a coinflip. It was 82% YES, not a 50/50. After Polymarkets decision to intervene and manipulate the market with their additional context/clarification Yes went to 0.1%
So just because people discussed it - it doesn't change the facts that the answer to that question is YES. If we discuss that the sky is purple would it become purple?
So just because people discussed it - it doesn't change the facts that the answer to that question is YES. If we discuss that the sky is purple would it become purple?
Lawsuit is incoming if they do not resolve this correctly. They can override UMAs decision so it is completely up to them to make things right.
Lawsuit is incoming if they do not resolve this correctly. They can override UMAs decision so it is completely up to them to make things right.
clarifications are just up to vibes... Lol... I mean they rewrote the rules after the SEC filing was public. YES shot up and I'm sure someone on the PM team made a "pretty penny" because of that on an alt account. They made their clarification and tanked the price.
clarifications are just up to vibes... Lol... I mean they rewrote the rules after the SEC filing was public. YES shot up and I'm sure someone on the PM team made a "pretty penny" because of that on an alt account. They made their clarification and tanked the price.
So that means that they can "clarify" however suits them? That's called insider trading...
So that means that they can "clarify" however suits them? That's called insider trading...
Anyone care to explain how this isn't a scam? Microstrategy files every Monday, we cannot get the needed information to settle the market on a Sunday?
Anyone care to explain how this isn't a scam? Microstrategy files every Monday, we cannot get the needed information to settle the market on a Sunday?
So about "Microstrategy sells any bitcoin by May 31 2026?" - additional context was added 01.06.2026 20:00 GMT, SEC filing was public by 01.06.2026 13:00 GMT. Isn't this blatant UMA voter manipulation? Isn't polymarket moving the goalposts post fact? I thought the market was sells any bitcoin, not ANNOUNCES..?
So about "Microstrategy sells any bitcoin by May 31 2026?" - additional context was added 01.06.2026 20:00 GMT, SEC filing was public by 01.06.2026 13:00 GMT. Isn't this blatant UMA voter manipulation? Isn't polymarket moving the goalposts post fact? I thought the market was sells any bitcoin, not ANNOUNCES..?