Predictshouldnt be possible at all
shouldnt be possible at all
edos参与话题 33消息总数 311
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 311 条，显示第 201-250 条and we save time
and we save time
still also on 1-0 doesnt make sense. its round of 32 competition. if not just give all the prizes directly to current rank
still also on 1-0 doesnt make sense. its round of 32 competition. if not just give all the prizes directly to current rank
literally how to delete incentive to new people to join to a possible fun comeptition
literally how to delete incentive to new people to join to a possible fun comeptition
tell me the sense of this...
tell me the sense of this...
in canada game 12 out of top 25 in group stages made top 25 in round of 32
in canada game 12 out of top 25 in group stages made top 25 in round of 32
now please dont bet 3-3 with those account in top 10 with brazil
now please dont bet 3-3 with those account in top 10 with brazil
ok i take it 250$
ok i take it 250$
yes, it will be something like this unfortunately
yes, it will be something like this unfortunately
thats already a lot. 5 of previous top 10 wil lmake top 10 in this... i remember you that they already won huige prizes for their effort. why they should get handed for free also those
thats already a lot. 5 of previous top 10 wil lmake top 10 in this... i remember you that they already won huige prizes for their effort. why they should get handed for free also those
i understand
i understand
you want say brazil will win 1-0 and getting 25k not bad
you want say brazil will win 1-0 and getting 25k not bad
cool
cool
you just want to keep receive free money with no variance
you just want to keep receive free money with no variance
for sure you dont ant it being top 10 everyone right
for sure you dont ant it being top 10 everyone right
when you market buy your bets, your account equity goes down 3$ with minimum size bets
when you market buy your bets, your account equity goes down 3$ with minimum size bets
will just give more variance in results
will just give more variance in results
if you have to guess a lot of things it doesnt make sense
if you have to guess a lot of things it doesnt make sense
it is costly to enter in competition
it is costly to enter in competition
no
no
top 10 is sure and is not fair already
top 10 is sure and is not fair already
i want to bet that nem will be in top 3
i want to bet that nem will be in top 3
it gives more chance. btw the best solution is adding more things to guess for points like i said. is a competition on a single game. you should guess a lot of things about it
it gives more chance. btw the best solution is adding more things to guess for points like i said. is a competition on a single game. you should guess a lot of things about it
for sure then top 10 in japan will win again in round of 32
for sure then top 10 in japan will win again in round of 32
i'm taking it
i'm taking it
yep he did, fair play and gg
yep he did, fair play and gg
Another example, I’m around rank 30 on Brazil, so I’m not starting from zero. But with the current structure, it still feels extremely hard (basically mathematically impossible) to reach the top prizes unless you were already very high from the group stage
Another example, I’m around rank 30 on Brazil, so I’m not starting from zero. But with the current structure, it still feels extremely hard (basically mathematically impossible) to reach the top prizes unless you were already very high from the group stage
I agree players from the start should have an edge, no issue with that. But I’m not saying someone joining now should easily compete for 1st place overall. My point is more about whether new/behind users have a realistic shot at even the smaller prizes for knockout rounds. If the answer is basically “only if there is a huge upset / perfect picks / finalist run”, then many people may just not bother entering or trading in the round. Canada being predictable is exactly part of the issue imo: if normal/predictable outcomes mostly keep the same leaderboard, then the R32 prize feels more like an extension of group-stage rewards than a fresh round incentive. Group-stage players already got rewarded for that stage. They should keep an advantage, but knockout rounds should still feel open enough that more users want to participate.
I agree players from the start should have an edge, no issue with that. But I’m not saying someone joining now should easily compete for 1st place overall. My point is more about whether new/behind users have a realistic shot at even the smaller prizes for knockout rounds. If the answer is basically “only if there is a huge upset / perfect picks / finalist run”, then many people may just not bother entering or trading in the round. Canada being predictable is exactly part of the issue imo: if normal/predictable outcomes mostly keep the same leaderboard, then the R32 prize feels more like an extension of group-stage rewards than a fresh round incentive. Group-stage players already got rewarded for that stage. They should keep an advantage, but knockout rounds should still feel open enough that more users want to participate.
Regarding the World Cup promo scoring, I think there may be an issue with how much group-stage points carry into knockout rounds. Right now it feels like users who finished very high in the group-stage leaderboard have such a big advantage that later round prizes are also heavily tilted toward them. I understand they should keep an edge because they played from the start, but they already got rewarded through the group stage prize pools. The question is whether knockout-round prizes should feel like a new meaningful competition too, rather than mostly an extension of the group stage leaderboard. Canada yesterday is a good example: the top 10 for the Round of 32 ended up being basically the same users from the group-stage ranking. That makes the R32 prize feel less like a new round prize and more like an additional reward for the same group-stage leaders. Another example: if a team’s current top 500 cutoff is already around 5,000–5,500 points and perfect R32 gives around 7,050 points, a new user can guess all the correct picks this round and still miss even the minimum prize if existing users score some points too. From a user/incentive POV, that can be the difference between “I’ll enter and trade this round” and “probably not worth the time.” I’m not saying group stage players should lose their advantage. They should keep one. I just think the knockout rounds may need enough weight that people outside the early leaderboard still feel they have a realistic shot at at least a small prize. Curious what other users think, does the current scoring feel balanced, or would higher knockout-round points make you more likely to participate/trade?
Regarding the World Cup promo scoring, I think there may be an issue with how much group-stage points carry into knockout rounds. Right now it feels like users who finished very high in the group-stage leaderboard have such a big advantage that later round prizes are also heavily tilted toward them. I understand they should keep an edge because they played from the start, but they already got rewarded through the group stage prize pools. The question is whether knockout-round prizes should feel like a new meaningful competition too, rather than mostly an extension of the group stage leaderboard. Canada yesterday is a good example: the top 10 for the Round of 32 ended up being basically the same users from the group-stage ranking. That makes the R32 prize feel less like a new round prize and more like an additional reward for the same group-stage leaders. Another example: if a team’s current top 500 cutoff is already around 5,000–5,500 points and perfect R32 gives around 7,050 points, a new user can guess all the correct picks this round and still miss even the minimum prize if existing users score some points too. From a user/incentive POV, that can be the difference between “I’ll enter and trade this round” and “probably not worth the time.” I’m not saying group stage players should lose their advantage. They should keep one. I just think the knockout rounds may need enough weight that people outside the early leaderboard still feel they have a realistic shot at at least a small prize. Curious what other users think, does the current scoring feel balanced, or would higher knockout-round points make you more likely to participate/trade?
Polymarket2m promo just for usa? what about for global?
2m promo just for usa? what about for global?
yes, it make sense to add liquidity and volume to that market
yes, it make sense to add liquidity and volume to that market
merge shares button fails too many times, can you please find a fix for it
merge shares button fails too many times, can you please find a fix for it
Hyperliquidwhy there arent anymore the moneyline for world cup games but just "team to advance" markets?? mistake imo, moneyline is always the one with more volume and interest
why there arent anymore the moneyline for world cup games but just "team to advance" markets?? mistake imo, moneyline is always the one with more volume and interest
How many fan points would someone get for guessing everything correctly in the Round of 32? Main thing I’m wondering is whether the knockout scoring will be high enough to keep the leaderboard open for people behind/new participants or if group stage points will still be too dominant I think keeping the promo feeling winnable during knockouts would drive more participation
How many fan points would someone get for guessing everything correctly in the Round of 32? Main thing I’m wondering is whether the knockout scoring will be high enough to keep the leaderboard open for people behind/new participants or if group stage points will still be too dominant I think keeping the promo feeling winnable during knockouts would drive more participation
not working for me
not working for me
might want to have site stable before resuming trading
might want to have site stable before resuming trading
yep at least that
yep at least that
thats a priority
thats a priority
cant cancel orders
cant cancel orders
damn just before kickoff
damn just before kickoff
to the 5k offer bot, i hate you
to the 5k offer bot, i hate you
also on all "exact scores" markets should be 0.1c min price movement. 1c make those markets untradable
also on all "exact scores" markets should be 0.1c min price movement. 1c make those markets untradable
why we went bak to 1c min price movement on world cup matches?? 0.1c is so much better and efficient
why we went bak to 1c min price movement on world cup matches?? 0.1c is so much better and efficient
yes basically now can compete just for small prizes
yes basically now can compete just for small prizes
my bad in my mind was just for group stages
my bad in my mind was just for group stages
i agree that point should be cumulative for all the elimination stages, as if not they are just a single game, but not cumulative from group stages
i agree that point should be cumulative for all the elimination stages, as if not they are just a single game, but not cumulative from group stages
would make a lot of sense to start from 0 for the elimination stages. if not game is already compromised for basically everyone
would make a lot of sense to start from 0 for the elimination stages. if not game is already compromised for basically everyone
reset point to 0 will create so much more volume
reset point to 0 will create so much more volume
oh shit, thought they would go to 0, so winners will keep winning
oh shit, thought they would go to 0, so winners will keep winning
Which TGE will happen first Polymarket vs Opensea
Which TGE will happen first Polymarket vs Opensea