该用户的聊天记录定位。
https://polymarket.com/event/us-iran-final-nuclear-deal-by-20260621201254412 DEC 31 Please, very natural and important bracket to have for the biggest geopol market on the site atm
https://polymarket.com/event/us-iran-final-nuclear-deal-by-20260621201254412 DEC 31 Please, very natural and important bracket to have for the biggest geopol market on the site atm
https://polymarket.com/event/us-iran-final-nuclear-deal-by-20260621201254412 Really need a Dec 31 for this market (one of the biggest markets atm)
https://polymarket.com/event/us-iran-final-nuclear-deal-by-20260621201254412 Really need a Dec 31 for this market (one of the biggest markets atm)
many believe it will be delayed a very long time or never happen
many believe it will be delayed a very long time or never happen
thank you so much for final nuclear deal! can you add Dec 31? and any other longer monthly. They can delay this by mutual agreement.
thank you so much for final nuclear deal! can you add Dec 31? and any other longer monthly. They can delay this by mutual agreement.
it's time guys! they are already doing negotiations for final deal
it's time guys! they are already doing negotiations for final deal
Hey guys I feel like a 'final iran deal done by' August (Natural 60 day timer) End of Year and any other brackets Would be a very important market to have. THE MOU stuff is signed and in action now so the next big one is when they do the final deal. Will be a massive market
Hey guys I feel like a 'final iran deal done by' August (Natural 60 day timer) End of Year and any other brackets Would be a very important market to have. THE MOU stuff is signed and in action now so the next big one is when they do the final deal. Will be a massive market
quite literally status quo is not changing
quite literally status quo is not changing
it is literally not that
it is literally not that
status quo = 0 they agreed to satus quo multiple reuptable sources have this easy interpretation of the clause it's not a crazy bad faith leap lol
status quo = 0 they agreed to satus quo multiple reuptable sources have this easy interpretation of the clause it's not a crazy bad faith leap lol
car is right i think it's a dead battle but it is what it says
car is right i think it's a dead battle but it is what it says
that's why it's strange, that's all
that's why it's strange, that's all
yea but usually they say 'as of now there is no credible consensus' they usually have that line
yea but usually they say 'as of now there is no credible consensus' they usually have that line
Yes arguments could techinically still be correct and go to UMA by the clarification. Obviously 0% chance (I'm holding no) but it is a very strange way to write a clarification
Yes arguments could techinically still be correct and go to UMA by the clarification. Obviously 0% chance (I'm holding no) but it is a very strange way to write a clarification
a classic
a classic
can we all agree this was a good one tho
can we all agree this was a good one tho
bro im trolling
bro im trolling
no way at least 30 they can still agree we have 11 days 🫡
no way at least 30 they can still agree we have 11 days 🫡
FV is 15-20 after clari No !!!!! <:pepecry:1480174599093096560>
FV is 15-20 after clari No !!!!! <:pepecry:1480174599093096560>
yes u should all buy it at 5-10c if he clarifies no 😄
yes u should all buy it at 5-10c if he clarifies no 😄
ye bro its correct but it's getting nuked
ye bro its correct but it's getting nuked
yea rules dont require explicit. sometimes polymarket rules do, but not on this market
yea rules dont require explicit. sometimes polymarket rules do, but not on this market
gg
gg
bro guys Yes is factually correct because the rules are actually quite forgiving. But we all know bossa is striking this one into the dirt vibes are too bad
bro guys Yes is factually correct because the rules are actually quite forgiving. But we all know bossa is striking this one into the dirt vibes are too bad
WSJ
WSJ
its left vague to save some face but that is what the clause is an agreement to do. NOT TO REBUILD AND START RE-ENRICHING
its left vague to save some face but that is what the clause is an agreement to do. NOT TO REBUILD AND START RE-ENRICHING
NYT has this interpretation of the clause, iranian officials have this interpretation of the clause, it's actually reality here
NYT has this interpretation of the clause, iranian officials have this interpretation of the clause, it's actually reality here
look, even the NYT has this interpretation of the clause
look, even the NYT has this interpretation of the clause
yes, they publically agreed to maintain enrichment at 0 for 60 days
yes, they publically agreed to maintain enrichment at 0 for 60 days
if you want more evidence for different parts of this interpretation we can go over it, but it is a truthful interpretion of the agreement. The rules to resolve this market are very light, any agreement for any stop in enrichment even if temporary qualifies
if you want more evidence for different parts of this interpretation we can go over it, but it is a truthful interpretion of the agreement. The rules to resolve this market are very light, any agreement for any stop in enrichment even if temporary qualifies
This is our interpretation of the clause. It is not a false, rulecuck interpretation at all. It is actually the only reason this clause is in the MOU in the first place
This is our interpretation of the clause. It is not a false, rulecuck interpretation at all. It is actually the only reason this clause is in the MOU in the first place
like quite literally
like quite literally
they agreed to not enrich for 60 days
they agreed to not enrich for 60 days
Intelligence report from 8 days ago
Intelligence report from 8 days ago
french gonna be mad
french gonna be mad
that's just yap
that's just yap
there are 2 nuclear clauses in the MOU lol
there are 2 nuclear clauses in the MOU lol
if it was a scam attempt yes would be low as sharps bought yes
if it was a scam attempt yes would be low as sharps bought yes
that's why yes is high
that's why yes is high
the clause is literally an agreement to not enrich while they work out the final deal, in a way that saves Iran face
the clause is literally an agreement to not enrich while they work out the final deal, in a way that saves Iran face
they will be allowed to enrich after the final deal almost certainly. again not what the market is about
they will be allowed to enrich after the final deal almost certainly. again not what the market is about
market is not about having uranium
market is not about having uranium
it will go Y final warning lol
it will go Y final warning lol
special shoutout to satoshiancap
special shoutout to satoshiancap
MY GOATS
MY GOATS
alexparker anoin and aekghas
alexparker anoin and aekghas
https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/2065841477947646381?s=20 this resolves the market. it's not a fucking one sentence line at a rally
https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/2065841477947646381?s=20 this resolves the market. it's not a fucking one sentence line at a rally
does this guy not know they can still announce tonight lol
does this guy not know they can still announce tonight lol
why have this rule if these scenarios dont count lol
why have this rule if these scenarios dont count lol
'This market’s resolution will be based on official statements from the U.S. government and will not require confirmation from Iran.'
'This market’s resolution will be based on official statements from the U.S. government and will not require confirmation from Iran.'
bro hes crazy. even without the dispute attempt this is surely -ev
bro hes crazy. even without the dispute attempt this is surely -ev
Polymarket