Polymarketalso Portwatch, source of the resolution, tends to count way lower than most other trackers
also Portwatch, source of the resolution, tends to count way lower than most other trackers
r2d2参与话题 7消息总数 111
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 111 条，显示第 101-111 条market seems to be pricing it correctly. likely a few weeks to clear mines and many refineries that shut down can't open immediately. insurance premiums are still through the roof and won't go down immediately. Takes time to process all of those insurances. 25% chance of getting 60 average seems reasonable, it's at around 15-20 now
market seems to be pricing it correctly. likely a few weeks to clear mines and many refineries that shut down can't open immediately. insurance premiums are still through the roof and won't go down immediately. Takes time to process all of those insurances. 25% chance of getting 60 average seems reasonable, it's at around 15-20 now
ho
ho
These sorts of scams from UMA are terrible for Polymarket. They only benefit few whales and wipe/scare new users
These sorts of scams from UMA are terrible for Polymarket. They only benefit few whales and wipe/scare new users
it's good to keep insisting, at least here. Polymarket does have a plan to replace the governance structure, replace UMA with their own, to try to get back in the US
it's good to keep insisting, at least here. Polymarket does have a plan to replace the governance structure, replace UMA with their own, to try to get back in the US
i got banned from UMA discord for insisting on this 😆
i got banned from UMA discord for insisting on this 😆
BTW, scam alert, just got this after I sent a message
BTW, scam alert, just got this after I sent a message
really? That would be excellent. Can't wait, we'll see if it can at least stop the insanity at UMA. They banned me there BTW lol
really? That would be excellent. Can't wait, we'll see if it can at least stop the insanity at UMA. They banned me there BTW lol
Hi. I am not sure if this is the correct channel for this. About the MicroStrategy bitcoin market issue, I would like to suggest, as an idea, that there should be a standard bare minimum of base text in the rules regarding when these markets close. I myself bought NO when I saw the controversy boiling, because I knew from previous experience that Additional Context and UMA would likely side with NO. However, these types of vague rules seem to encourage newcomers to buy hard into a market. While we can blame them for not investigating how it works, having new money transferred to veteran accounts can discourage future newcomers from joining, which can be negative for the market as a whole. It would be positive to at least specify that information that comes after the market ends will not be taken into consideration. I know some will still insist on throwing their money at a lost cause, but I do believe at least some of them will be cautious.
Hi. I am not sure if this is the correct channel for this. About the MicroStrategy bitcoin market issue, I would like to suggest, as an idea, that there should be a standard bare minimum of base text in the rules regarding when these markets close. I myself bought NO when I saw the controversy boiling, because I knew from previous experience that Additional Context and UMA would likely side with NO. However, these types of vague rules seem to encourage newcomers to buy hard into a market. While we can blame them for not investigating how it works, having new money transferred to veteran accounts can discourage future newcomers from joining, which can be negative for the market as a whole. It would be positive to at least specify that information that comes after the market ends will not be taken into consideration. I know some will still insist on throwing their money at a lost cause, but I do believe at least some of them will be cautious.
ok so, after this comment, I got this message from this user, it seems like a scam since we are not on the same mutual Polymarket channel. Just reporting
ok so, after this comment, I got this message from this user, it seems like a scam since we are not on the same mutual Polymarket channel. Just reporting
Hi. I am not sure if this is the correct channel for this. About the MicroStrategy bitcoin market issue, I would like to suggest, as an idea, that there should be a standard bare minimum of base text in the rules regarding when these markets close. I myself bought NO when I saw the controversy boiling, because I knew from previous experience that Additional Context and UMA would likely side with NO. However, these types of vague rules seem to encourage newcomers to buy hard into a market. While we can blame them for not investigating how it works, having new money transferred to veteran accounts can discourage future newcomers from joining, which can be negative for the market as a whole. It would be positive to at least specify that information that comes after the market ends will not be taken into consideration. I know some will still insist on throwing their money at a lost cause, but I do believe at least some of them will be cautious.
Hi. I am not sure if this is the correct channel for this. About the MicroStrategy bitcoin market issue, I would like to suggest, as an idea, that there should be a standard bare minimum of base text in the rules regarding when these markets close. I myself bought NO when I saw the controversy boiling, because I knew from previous experience that Additional Context and UMA would likely side with NO. However, these types of vague rules seem to encourage newcomers to buy hard into a market. While we can blame them for not investigating how it works, having new money transferred to veteran accounts can discourage future newcomers from joining, which can be negative for the market as a whole. It would be positive to at least specify that information that comes after the market ends will not be taken into consideration. I know some will still insist on throwing their money at a lost cause, but I do believe at least some of them will be cautious.
← 上一页
第 3 / 3 页