该用户的聊天记录定位。
requoting quite quickly on a market and it's sometimes aggregating the creates and claiming i have many many resting orders -- triggers an alert of mine
requoting quite quickly on a market and it's sometimes aggregating the creates and claiming i have many many resting orders -- triggers an alert of mine
`get_orders()` really lagging for me rn
`get_orders()` really lagging for me rn
is obnoxious
is obnoxious
i also get world cup emails but every alert of mine is off
i also get world cup emails but every alert of mine is off
b/c he’s gonna remove them haha
b/c he’s gonna remove them haha
i run everything through a central client, thankfully. this scared me haha
i run everything through a central client, thankfully. this scared me haha
5480347 as of my last walk 😵
5480347 as of my last walk 😵
why did you have this assumption
why did you have this assumption
this may be on v1 order endpoints only
this may be on v1 order endpoints only
did behavior change on batch cancel for already canceled orders? i'm getting `HttpError(410 Gone)` i believe? instead of an error code within the response that says `"not_found"`? i cannot confirm right now
did behavior change on batch cancel for already canceled orders? i'm getting `HttpError(410 Gone)` i believe? instead of an error code within the response that says `"not_found"`? i cannot confirm right now
the less changes to the api from any given point in time the better, imo
the less changes to the api from any given point in time the better, imo
hope they don't <:blob_thumbs_up:1377135777884016670>
hope they don't <:blob_thumbs_up:1377135777884016670>
why am I getting `{'type': 'error', 'sid': 3, 'seq': 1, 'msg': {'code': 28, 'msg': 'Markets not found',` if code 28 isn't even in the docs anymore
why am I getting `{'type': 'error', 'sid': 3, 'seq': 1, 'msg': {'code': 28, 'msg': 'Markets not found',` if code 28 isn't even in the docs anymore
more worth on other exchanges where only FIX has cloid dedupe, not the API 😵💫
more worth on other exchanges where only FIX has cloid dedupe, not the API 😵💫
the `CancelOrdersOnDisconnect=Y` is a good feature
the `CancelOrdersOnDisconnect=Y` is a good feature
maybe i should try it 😛
maybe i should try it 😛
premier has always been FIX? 🤔 i have poor memory
premier has always been FIX? 🤔 i have poor memory
(i might be wrong)
(i might be wrong)
re: this mini rant: https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/927686720990892032/1513040162404438016
re: this mini rant: https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/927686720990892032/1513040162404438016
kalshi has x2 in the formula 👍 greed accounting lgtm
kalshi has x2 in the formula 👍 greed accounting lgtm
buy now ask later
buy now ask later
i was too confident that i remove all closed markets from my active set 🙂
i was too confident that i remove all closed markets from my active set 🙂
also a systemic issue for you that you orphan a small subset of closed markets?
also a systemic issue for you that you orphan a small subset of closed markets?
yes i kill ws aggressively on any error code, forgot it could be non fatal 🙂
yes i kill ws aggressively on any error code, forgot it could be non fatal 🙂
ah
ah
this is a fair point
this is a fair point
(and i guess more clearly none of the thousands of tickers i subscribed to encountered that)
(and i guess more clearly none of the thousands of tickers i subscribed to encountered that)
i think this race: found open market -> subscribe -> market has closed, is unlikely. I had only 28 offending tickers, oldest from 26MAY23, and none were a result of this race
i think this race: found open market -> subscribe -> market has closed, is unlikely. I had only 28 offending tickers, oldest from 26MAY23, and none were a result of this race
for me personally I have an edge case where I don't clear certain markets when they end and they get orphaned -- so I am not going to be doing a sweeping check in my websocket file
for me personally I have an edge case where I don't clear certain markets when they end and they get orphaned -- so I am not going to be doing a sweeping check in my websocket file
I am looking at my logs, and in line with the changelog, it seems to just be firing when I subscribe to `orderbook_delta` with tickers that don't exist (checking their status, they are in `finalized`, but maybe this would also trigger if their status was in `{"inactive", "closed", "determined", "finalized"}`)
I am looking at my logs, and in line with the changelog, it seems to just be firing when I subscribe to `orderbook_delta` with tickers that don't exist (checking their status, they are in `finalized`, but maybe this would also trigger if their status was in `{"inactive", "closed", "determined", "finalized"}`)
`'code': 28, 'msg': 'Markets not found'` gross
`'code': 28, 'msg': 'Markets not found'` gross
xD
xD
since when
since when
there are 1620564 markets as of 30min ago. it doesn't take that long to do a full walk
there are 1620564 markets as of 30min ago. it doesn't take that long to do a full walk
actually the fractional contracts might complicate
actually the fractional contracts might complicate
your personal contracts traded is equivalent in quantity to the dollars notional of the trade
your personal contracts traded is equivalent in quantity to the dollars notional of the trade
yeah so greed.bot’s number is $ notional but half the # of total contracts
yeah so greed.bot’s number is $ notional but half the # of total contracts
1 YES + 1 NO = $1
1 YES + 1 NO = $1
lowkey confusing
lowkey confusing
then if there is a sole market maker they still are only 50% of exchange vol and not 100% in # of contracts
then if there is a sole market maker they still are only 50% of exchange vol and not 100% in # of contracts
it would be equivalent to do trailing 30-day *not* counting both sides divided by prev_month, currently the 2's are canceling
it would be equivalent to do trailing 30-day *not* counting both sides divided by prev_month, currently the 2's are canceling
why do it that way
why do it that way
oh I didn't even notice the 2x in the formula
oh I didn't even notice the 2x in the formula
maybe i’n misinterpreting
maybe i’n misinterpreting
which would be 2x the volume on leaderboards
which would be 2x the volume on leaderboards
“Your volume share is your trailing 30-day volume (counting both sides of every trade you’re part of, as maker and as taker)” my own reporting has been just the contracts i trade. you’re saying this is 2x, so the notional of my trades?
“Your volume share is your trailing 30-day volume (counting both sides of every trade you’re part of, as maker and as taker)” my own reporting has been just the contracts i trade. you’re saying this is 2x, so the notional of my trades?
😭
😭
something like that
something like that
i happen to also use positions ws in case fills is dead/delayed, i have a chance to still manage risk if my position increases drastically. i don't use user orders
i happen to also use positions ws in case fills is dead/delayed, i have a chance to still manage risk if my position increases drastically. i don't use user orders
sure, you should be having your client order id already waiting for fills before you even place the order with that client order id
sure, you should be having your client order id already waiting for fills before you even place the order with that client order id
Kalshi