聊天记录
共 24 条，显示第 1-24 条
Hi! I wanted to ask whether you've considered introducing some form of maker fee rebates.
I'm a very active trader on the Up/Down markets (you can see my stats in the screenshot). At least $220k of that volume was from maker orders.
If I had traded the exact same strategy on Polymarket, I would have earned roughly $1,500 in maker rebates. On Predict.fun, however, I receive nothing in return—not even points, because my orders are typically 20–50 shares, which is below the minimum threshold for the points program.
It feels a bit unfair that the current incentives reward posting large amounts of volume that often isn't intended to trade (I think everyone understands how most people farm points), while traders who provide real liquidity that actually gets filled receive no advantage at all.
I think it would be great if Predict.fun introduced either:
direct maker fee rebates, or
some kind of points bonus for maker orders that actually get executed, even if they're smaller than 100 shares.
That would reward genuine liquidity provision instead of simply incentivizing large posted order sizes.
Hi! I wanted to ask whether you've considered introducing some form of maker fee rebates.
I'm a very active trader on the Up/Down markets (you can see my stats in the screenshot). At least $220k of that volume was from maker orders.
If I had traded the exact same strategy on Polymarket, I would have earned roughly $1,500 in maker rebates. On Predict.fun, however, I receive nothing in return—not even points, because my orders are typically 20–50 shares, which is below the minimum threshold for the points program.
It feels a bit unfair that the current incentives reward posting large amounts of volume that often isn't intended to trade (I think everyone understands how most people farm points), while traders who provide real liquidity that actually gets filled receive no advantage at all.
I think it would be great if Predict.fun introduced either:
direct maker fee rebates, or
some kind of points bonus for maker orders that actually get executed, even if they're smaller than 100 shares.
That would reward genuine liquidity provision instead of simply incentivizing large posted order sizes.
If you send a market order with a price of 0.99, it will be matched against the current best ask. But don't forget that there is a 250 ms delay for non-post-only orders, so the counterparty may disappear during this window
If you send a market order with a price of 0.99, it will be matched against the current best ask. But don't forget that there is a 250 ms delay for non-post-only orders, so the counterparty may disappear during this window
<@1272957747759153172> is it safe to use now?
<@1272957747759153172> is it safe to use now?
Use API according the docs. They have all you need
Use API according the docs. They have all you need
I suggest introducing fee rebates or points rewards for orders smaller than 100 shares, but only if they actually get FILLED. Most of the displayed liquidity is fake liquidity that simply moves away from the mid-price. At the same time, orders under 100 shares placed by real users receive NOTHING — neither fee rebates (like on Polymarket, where traders get a share of the market fees) nor points. The team's decision ultimately depends on WHAT kind of liquidity and WHAT type of users they want to attract
I suggest introducing fee rebates or points rewards for orders smaller than 100 shares, but only if they actually get FILLED. Most of the displayed liquidity is fake liquidity that simply moves away from the mid-price. At the same time, orders under 100 shares placed by real users receive NOTHING — neither fee rebates (like on Polymarket, where traders get a share of the market fees) nor points. The team's decision ultimately depends on WHAT kind of liquidity and WHAT type of users they want to attract
https://x.com/NightShifter132/status/2068953920685367601
https://x.com/NightShifter132/status/2068953920685367601
I'm not sure but i don't see the way... But for me it's absolutely ok already, it's like 0.005$ per 1 time
I'm not sure but i don't see the way... But for me it's absolutely ok already, it's like 0.005$ per 1 time
Oh, actually can. Found at <@1280815964568682518>'s Github. But seems like have to pay gas yourself (cheap, about 0.00001 BNB)
Oh, actually can. Found at <@1280815964568682518>'s Github. But seems like have to pay gas yourself (cheap, about 0.00001 BNB)
Could you pls let me know where can i read about Split/Merge via API/SDK? 🙏 don't see any info in Docs
Could you pls let me know where can i read about Split/Merge via API/SDK? 🙏 don't see any info in Docs
yep
yep
same, have errors for Split
same, have errors for Split
I have data with orderId, orderHash, settlementId
I have data with orderId, orderHash, settlementId
<@802217872993812572> hi. Is there someone on the technical side I could talk to about the high ghost fill rate on UpDown markets?
<@802217872993812572> hi. Is there someone on the technical side I could talk to about the high ghost fill rate on UpDown markets?
Yep. AWS EC2
Yep. AWS EC2
Guys <@802217872993812572> <@1476092857583407114> <@1280815964568682518> , are you planning to relocate your servers? It's actually in your best interest if you want to increase liquidity and volume, especially on live events. If you do it, a lot of arbitrage traders will come organically, you won't even need to incentivize them with points.
I'm trying to arbitrage against Polymarket, but with your servers where they are right now, it's basically gambling. RTT is 260 ms. Let's say I'm trading a highly volatile market like BTC Up/Down 15m. I place a limit order, and if the price moves right after I send it, there's basically nothing I can do. I only get the order ID back after ~260 ms. Then I have to send a cancellation request and place a new limit order, which takes another half RTT to reach your servers (+130 ms).
And that's in the ideal case with zero processing delays, just pure network latency. That's already ~400 ms. Meanwhile, Polymarket RTT is around 20 ms from eu-west-1.
Guys <@802217872993812572> <@1476092857583407114> <@1280815964568682518> , are you planning to relocate your servers? It's actually in your best interest if you want to increase liquidity and volume, especially on live events. If you do it, a lot of arbitrage traders will come organically, you won't even need to incentivize them with points.
I'm trying to arbitrage against Polymarket, but with your servers where they are right now, it's basically gambling. RTT is 260 ms. Let's say I'm trading a highly volatile market like BTC Up/Down 15m. I place a limit order, and if the price moves right after I send it, there's basically nothing I can do. I only get the order ID back after ~260 ms. Then I have to send a cancellation request and place a new limit order, which takes another half RTT to reach your servers (+130 ms).
And that's in the ideal case with zero processing delays, just pure network latency. That's already ~400 ms. Meanwhile, Polymarket RTT is around 20 ms from eu-west-1.
for me 5 min event still have not good latency, but 15 min seems to be better
for me 5 min event still have not good latency, but 15 min seems to be better
?
?
pm_response_ms=5610
HEDGE PM failed UP sh=66.66: order failed to process
If they don't fix this in today's update, I'm probably moving to Kalshi. I'm tired of Polymarket and their endless bullshit. First I built a profitable temperature bot — they killed temperature markets. Then I built an UP/DOWN bot — and now the entire thing is broken. Nothing works. I'm so fucking tired of these incompetent clowns...
pm_response_ms=5610
HEDGE PM failed UP sh=66.66: order failed to process
If they don't fix this in today's update, I'm probably moving to Kalshi. I'm tired of Polymarket and their endless bullshit. First I built a profitable temperature bot — they killed temperature markets. Then I built an UP/DOWN bot — and now the entire thing is broken. Nothing works. I'm so fucking tired of these incompetent clowns...
eu-west-1
eu-west-1
p50 = 454 ms
p90 = 5619 ms
p99 = 8667 ms
💀
p50 = 454 ms
p90 = 5619 ms
p99 = 8667 ms
💀
what i suppose to do
what i suppose to do
have not hedged legs because of this idiots
have not hedged legs because of this idiots
i hate polymarket
i hate polymarket
i stopped my bot, which spent about 100$/day on fees.Yes, that's not so much in total volume, but let's say if about a thousand traders do the same, it would cost poly about 100k/day = 3kk/month. But i dont think it's possible cause not many ppl spend so much for fees
i stopped my bot, which spent about 100$/day on fees.Yes, that's not so much in total volume, but let's say if about a thousand traders do the same, it would cost poly about 100k/day = 3kk/month. But i dont think it's possible cause not many ppl spend so much for fees
Predict
Polymarket