Polymarketso if I say, praise to be Allah with mocking gestures and stupid voice looking at you, and laughing, am I still praising?
so if I say, praise to be Allah with mocking gestures and stupid voice looking at you, and laughing, am I still praising?
nele_next_level参与话题 6消息总数 280
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 280 条，显示第 101-150 条he's not praising thoo, he is saying that Iranias could say it while waving the white flag
he's not praising thoo, he is saying that Iranias could say it while waving the white flag
Fable 5: Honestly? No — read plainly, he isn't. In that sentence "Praise be to Allah" is reported speech: he's scripting what Iran could say when they "wave the white flag." Trump is the narrator of a hypothetical surrender, not the one doing the praising
Fable 5: Honestly? No — read plainly, he isn't. In that sentence "Praise be to Allah" is reported speech: he's scripting what Iran could say when they "wave the white flag." Trump is the narrator of a hypothetical surrender, not the one doing the praising
can someone send the link to the phone call? what minute did he say it?
can someone send the link to the phone call? what minute did he say it?
soo, bond to yes!!??
soo, bond to yes!!??
sorry, too many messages I am getting confuuuuused
sorry, too many messages I am getting confuuuuused
what about the first resolution then, it was a Yes because of the truthsocial post
what about the first resolution then, it was a Yes because of the truthsocial post
yes, but that Market Opened: Jun 10, 2026, 12:06 PM ET
yes, but that Market Opened: Jun 10, 2026, 12:06 PM ET
then this market should be no, because that's exactly what he said in truthsocial https://polymarket.com/event/who-will-trump-publicly-praise-by-june-30
then this market should be no, because that's exactly what he said in truthsocial https://polymarket.com/event/who-will-trump-publicly-praise-by-june-30
so then the previous market, was also an insult?
so then the previous market, was also an insult?
what does he says? Praise be to Allah? because if it's that, that's what resolved the previous market
what does he says? Praise be to Allah? because if it's that, that's what resolved the previous market
deffo,
deffo,
this already happened right? Fucking Times Now bs of channel man
this already happened right? Fucking Times Now bs of channel man
can you pls share the site?
can you pls share the site?
we'll see what he says next lol
we'll see what he says next lol
oh no, sorry, I don't mean that one. I mean the previous one, the market with all the insults
oh no, sorry, I don't mean that one. I mean the previous one, the market with all the insults
but it got resolved, so now we're waiting for him to say it again?
but it got resolved, so now we're waiting for him to say it again?
😓 yo, I was just tryna help man.
😓 yo, I was just tryna help man.
what do you use to screenshot? are you on windows? snipping tool?
what do you use to screenshot? are you on windows? snipping tool?
oh! I see now, much better thanks👍🏾
oh! I see now, much better thanks👍🏾
yo, I can't read shit, I don't think I need prescription glasses👓
yo, I can't read shit, I don't think I need prescription glasses👓
are you all trying to scam this or smth?
are you all trying to scam this or smth?
ffs
ffs
https://polymarket.com/event/who-will-trump-announce-as-next-director-of-national-intelligence is this the same? https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116722436233594406
https://polymarket.com/event/who-will-trump-announce-as-next-director-of-national-intelligence is this the same? https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116722436233594406
yeap, yesterday the temp for London also crossed the 16.5, and according to the round up rule it should count as 17, but guess what? it didn't😉
yeap, yesterday the temp for London also crossed the 16.5, and according to the round up rule it should count as 17, but guess what? it didn't😉
why in brackets? why have it there at all for 17th?
why in brackets? why have it there at all for 17th?
it was proposed NO
it was proposed NO
the proposal just changed ?
the proposal just changed ?
market?
market?
right, because if it's not... then the trap in rules again, must of them are free tier... not free app hahaha
right, because if it's not... then the trap in rules again, must of them are free tier... not free app hahaha
free app meaning purchase price is FREE in appstore? right?
free app meaning purchase price is FREE in appstore? right?
I don;t know... but it wouldn't be the first time would it?
I don;t know... but it wouldn't be the first time would it?
yes, there's no doubt that is a "Mythos-class": *Mythos-class models are a tier of Claude models that sit above our Opus class in capability. The first, Claude Mythos Preview, was released in April through Project Glasswing. That is followed today by Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5.* what is bs is the change of rules when the market was already there and users already bought positions. hahha That's deffo a change to favour one of them
yes, there's no doubt that is a "Mythos-class": *Mythos-class models are a tier of Claude models that sit above our Opus class in capability. The first, Claude Mythos Preview, was released in April through Project Glasswing. That is followed today by Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5.* what is bs is the change of rules when the market was already there and users already bought positions. hahha That's deffo a change to favour one of them
so they can do that? even if someone buys a position before the rules changed?
so they can do that? even if someone buys a position before the rules changed?
Hahahha wtf?
Hahahha wtf?
By claude:😂 Arguments for “No” (or dispute): The market’s title and framing center on releasing “Claude Mythos” or a model “confirmed to be the same model referenced in the leak.” Fable 5 is a safeguarded variant — the unrestricted Mythos 5 remains private. Mythos 5 is only available to a “small group of cyberdefenders and infrastructure providers.” One could argue Fable 5 isn’t “the same model referenced in the leak” but rather a guardrailed derivative, and that the actual Mythos model is still not public. The decisive factor is the explicit clause: a model Anthropic “officially describes as a ‘Mythos-class’ model or similar” qualifies. Anthropic’s own description of Fable 5 as a Mythos-class model appears to satisfy that condition directly — which leans toward Yes. But because the unrestricted Mythos itself remains private, expect this to be contested in resolution.
By claude:😂 Arguments for “No” (or dispute): The market’s title and framing center on releasing “Claude Mythos” or a model “confirmed to be the same model referenced in the leak.” Fable 5 is a safeguarded variant — the unrestricted Mythos 5 remains private. Mythos 5 is only available to a “small group of cyberdefenders and infrastructure providers.” One could argue Fable 5 isn’t “the same model referenced in the leak” but rather a guardrailed derivative, and that the actual Mythos model is still not public. The decisive factor is the explicit clause: a model Anthropic “officially describes as a ‘Mythos-class’ model or similar” qualifies. Anthropic’s own description of Fable 5 as a Mythos-class model appears to satisfy that condition directly — which leans toward Yes. But because the unrestricted Mythos itself remains private, expect this to be contested in resolution.
good😁
good😁
again more traps inside the rules with wording that only makes sense to them
again more traps inside the rules with wording that only makes sense to them
but of course a mythos class bs
but of course a mythos class bs
So even that Mythos is not Publicly accessible, and the rules says that it needs to be Publicly accessible, still. a yes?
So even that Mythos is not Publicly accessible, and the rules says that it needs to be Publicly accessible, still. a yes?
but nobody accept it for the Iran word with Xi... wtf...
but nobody accept it for the Iran word with Xi... wtf...
so now we are going to accept c-span as live is it? hahahha
so now we are going to accept c-span as live is it? hahahha
that was yesterday 8th after the Game lol
that was yesterday 8th after the Game lol
that was yesterday not today
that was yesterday not today
he said it yesterday
he said it yesterday
that's a video?
that's a video?
I read the model based on ICAO Annex 3 and US-ASOS-only extension
I read the model based on ICAO Annex 3 and US-ASOS-only extension
it doesn't update at the tick, is every 30 min
it doesn't update at the tick, is every 30 min
yeah and metar registers every 30 minutes what the City airport says
yeah and metar registers every 30 minutes what the City airport says
meteoblue:
meteoblue: