I am officially contesting this market https://polymarket.com/ru/event/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026-27c?locale=event&category=highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026&slug=highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026-27c. The official Weather Underground data for station ZGSZ clearly shows a peak of 82°F (27.77°C) at 16:00. By market rules, 27.77°C rounds to 28°C. Yet, the market was resolved to 27°C. Furthermore, the "Daily Summary" shows "No data recorded," suggesting the oracle used an incomplete data subset. We were denied a fair chance to dispute this as the resolution was rushed. As the largest "No" holder, I demand an explanation for why the recorded hourly peak was ignored.
I am officially contesting this market https://polymarket.com/ru/event/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026-27c?locale=event&category=highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026&slug=highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026-27c. The official Weather Underground data for station ZGSZ clearly shows a peak of 82°F (27.77°C) at 16:00. By market rules, 27.77°C rounds to 28°C. Yet, the market was resolved to 27°C. Furthermore, the "Daily Summary" shows "No data recorded," suggesting the oracle used an incomplete data subset. We were denied a fair chance to dispute this as the resolution was rushed. As the largest "No" holder, I demand an explanation for why the recorded hourly peak was ignored.
I am officially contesting this market https://polymarket.com/ru/event/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026-27c?locale=event&category=highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026&slug=highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026-27c. The official Weather Underground data for station ZGSZ clearly shows a peak of 82°F (27.77°C) at 16:00. By market rules, 27.77°C rounds to 28°C. Yet, the market was resolved to 27°C. Furthermore, the "Daily Summary" shows "No data recorded," suggesting the oracle used an incomplete data subset. We were denied a fair chance to dispute this as the resolution was rushed. As the largest "No" holder, I demand an explanation for why the recorded hourly peak was ignored.
I am officially contesting this market https://polymarket.com/ru/event/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026-27c?locale=event&category=highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026&slug=highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026-27c. The official Weather Underground data for station ZGSZ clearly shows a peak of 82°F (27.77°C) at 16:00. By market rules, 27.77°C rounds to 28°C. Yet, the market was resolved to 27°C. Furthermore, the "Daily Summary" shows "No data recorded," suggesting the oracle used an incomplete data subset. We were denied a fair chance to dispute this as the resolution was rushed. As the largest "No" holder, I demand an explanation for why the recorded hourly peak was ignored.
I am officially contesting this market https://polymarket.com/ru/event/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026-27c?locale=event&category=highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026&slug=highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026-27c. The official Weather Underground data for station ZGSZ clearly shows a peak of 82°F (27.77°C) at 16:00. By market rules, 27.77°C rounds to 28°C. Yet, the market was resolved to 27°C. Furthermore, the "Daily Summary" shows "No data recorded," suggesting the oracle used an incomplete data subset. We were denied a fair chance to dispute this as the resolution was rushed. As the largest "No" holder, I demand an explanation for why the recorded hourly peak was ignored.
I am officially contesting this market https://polymarket.com/ru/event/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026-27c?locale=event&category=highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026&slug=highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-9-2026-27c. The official Weather Underground data for station ZGSZ clearly shows a peak of 82°F (27.77°C) at 16:00. By market rules, 27.77°C rounds to 28°C. Yet, the market was resolved to 27°C. Furthermore, the "Daily Summary" shows "No data recorded," suggesting the oracle used an incomplete data subset. We were denied a fair chance to dispute this as the resolution was rushed. As the largest "No" holder, I demand an explanation for why the recorded hourly peak was ignored.
The 'Highest temperature in Shenzhen on June 8' market was also incorrectly resolved. There was a one-degree error in the resolution, just like the June 9 market. Therefore, I do not recommend participating in this market due to the ongoing risk of inaccurate resolutions https://polymarket.com/ru/event/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-8-2026
The 'Highest temperature in Shenzhen on June 8' market was also incorrectly resolved. There was a one-degree error in the resolution, just like the June 9 market. Therefore, I do not recommend participating in this market due to the ongoing risk of inaccurate resolutions https://polymarket.com/ru/event/highest-temperature-in-shenzhen-on-june-8-2026
This market is broken. The issue is not even about the rules — it's that the result is being displayed incorrectly
This market is broken. The issue is not even about the rules — it's that the result is being displayed incorrectly
Looks fine to me.
Oh, I see. There is something screwy going on - it looks like WU uses 2 totally different data sources for C and F - the temp graphs are different, and even the windspeeds are different.
Looks fine to me.
Oh, I see. There is something screwy going on - it looks like WU uses 2 totally different data sources for C and F - the temp graphs are different, and even the windspeeds are different.
yeap, yesterday the temp for London also crossed the 16.5, and according to the round up rule it should count as 17, but guess what? it didn't😉
yeap, yesterday the temp for London also crossed the 16.5, and according to the round up rule it should count as 17, but guess what? it didn't😉