Hyperliquidwen network downgrade tho
wen network downgrade tho
Except参与话题 2消息总数 6
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 6 条，显示第 1-6 条so we're not housing all of finance anymore? kekw
so we're not housing all of finance anymore? kekw
Jeff, for me the sticking point isn't even the gas limit, it's where the answer lands: if an app doesn't plug into HyperCore, build it elsewhere. That ends up sorting which builders feel welcome here. And finance isn't only LSTs, vaults and RWAs. It also runs on payments, lending, games, consumer apps, all the random experiments. That's what brings the users and liquidity in, and it's usually the soil the HyperCore-native apps grow out of later. Push those builders off and you dry up the thing that feeds the apps you actually want. You can keep HyperCore composability as the headline without making everyone else feel like they don't belong. "House all of finance" and "only build it if it touches HyperCore" don't quite line up.
Jeff, for me the sticking point isn't even the gas limit, it's where the answer lands: if an app doesn't plug into HyperCore, build it elsewhere. That ends up sorting which builders feel welcome here. And finance isn't only LSTs, vaults and RWAs. It also runs on payments, lending, games, consumer apps, all the random experiments. That's what brings the users and liquidity in, and it's usually the soil the HyperCore-native apps grow out of later. Push those builders off and you dry up the thing that feeds the apps you actually want. You can keep HyperCore composability as the headline without making everyone else feel like they don't belong. "House all of finance" and "only build it if it touches HyperCore" don't quite line up.
Throughput isn't free on hyperevm, fair. but "cheaper gas just feeds more bots" is just induced demand. if extra capacity gets eaten the second you add it, that's because the demand is bottomless, which is the reason to scale, not the reason not to. by that logic you never raise a gas limit anywhere. And arb bots aren't a parasite you congest away, they're literally the price discovery. They pay top of block and keep every market on the chain tight. congestion doesn't filter them out, it hits everyone in the block the same, so the normal guy doing one swap eats the fee while the bot just rebids higher and keeps going. You fix that with more throughput and a local fee market, not by asking people to trade less. honestly it's wild that in 2026 the take is "we spike under load so please send less volume." we're literally arguing we need LESS activity because the chain can't handle it, and treating that as the normal state of things. if volume spiking is your problem then the cap is the problem, not the volume. build for the demand instead of asking it to go away.
Throughput isn't free on hyperevm, fair. but "cheaper gas just feeds more bots" is just induced demand. if extra capacity gets eaten the second you add it, that's because the demand is bottomless, which is the reason to scale, not the reason not to. by that logic you never raise a gas limit anywhere. And arb bots aren't a parasite you congest away, they're literally the price discovery. They pay top of block and keep every market on the chain tight. congestion doesn't filter them out, it hits everyone in the block the same, so the normal guy doing one swap eats the fee while the bot just rebids higher and keeps going. You fix that with more throughput and a local fee market, not by asking people to trade less. honestly it's wild that in 2026 the take is "we spike under load so please send less volume." we're literally arguing we need LESS activity because the chain can't handle it, and treating that as the normal state of things. if volume spiking is your problem then the cap is the problem, not the volume. build for the demand instead of asking it to go away.
better code than 99% of ~~young ~~ developers*
better code than 99% of ~~young ~~ developers*
this ☝️
this ☝️