Kalshiits definitely not real time updated, at least for daily leaderboard
its definitely not real time updated, at least for daily leaderboard
lybi0r参与话题 3消息总数 8
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 8 条，显示第 1-8 条please consider fees generated as well for the tiers, not all volume is equally valuable in the end
please consider fees generated as well for the tiers, not all volume is equally valuable in the end
get to $80m monthly volume and you are clear
get to $80m monthly volume and you are clear
yeah, something changed for me as well, seems like I receive an upstream error frame and my app goes into an error loop
yeah, something changed for me as well, seems like I receive an upstream error frame and my app goes into an error loop
Anyone knows what the milesotnes statuses such as "CTC, UC, ST, S" for ITF matches for example mean?
Anyone knows what the milesotnes statuses such as "CTC, UC, ST, S" for ITF matches for example mean?
2 things: 1) any chance you would make the percentage and / or the individual stats easily accessible somewhere (you must track it internally anyway)? So we know where we currently stand? 2) any chance to consider my earlier fees paid based qualification criteria as well? Thank you
2 things: 1) any chance you would make the percentage and / or the individual stats easily accessible somewhere (you must track it internally anyway)? So we know where we currently stand? 2) any chance to consider my earlier fees paid based qualification criteria as well? Thank you
yes, but I am talking about the fact that not all volume creates the same amount of fees for kalshi
yes, but I am talking about the fact that not all volume creates the same amount of fees for kalshi
I understand the general reasoning around volume / liquidity, but I feel like another thing to consider should be around total fees paid. Because while you are trying to provide most resources to people providing volume / liqudity, for people to have better experience, the end goal is to make the most in fees anyway no? So in my opinion, it would also make sense to offer along the volume % based tiers also a % fees paid tiers to those top accounts that are directly contributing to Kalshi bottom line. As volume and fees are not directly correlated in all cases. Basically skipping the middle man, and going from providing liquidity -> more happy customers -> more fees for kalshi -> more resources , directly to more fees paid to kalshi -> more resources. Hope this makes sense.
I understand the general reasoning around volume / liquidity, but I feel like another thing to consider should be around total fees paid. Because while you are trying to provide most resources to people providing volume / liqudity, for people to have better experience, the end goal is to make the most in fees anyway no? So in my opinion, it would also make sense to offer along the volume % based tiers also a % fees paid tiers to those top accounts that are directly contributing to Kalshi bottom line. As volume and fees are not directly correlated in all cases. Basically skipping the middle man, and going from providing liquidity -> more happy customers -> more fees for kalshi -> more resources , directly to more fees paid to kalshi -> more resources. Hope this makes sense.