PolymarketThat's not F. That's 'r bar'
That's not F. That's 'r bar'
lranon参与话题 1消息总数 34
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 34 条，显示第 1-34 条Ok thank you
Ok thank you
This
This
Can you please check this market
Can you please check this market
also, if so, then how can PM make such a terrible mistake and they named "Wenbo". it's clear that post market creation, Wenbo was removed. hence in rules his name was written.
also, if so, then how can PM make such a terrible mistake and they named "Wenbo". it's clear that post market creation, Wenbo was removed. hence in rules his name was written.
any proof that it was before 8th april
any proof that it was before 8th april
on which date was this updated?
on which date was this updated?
it's okay. my PNL is great . unlike your fake PNL
it's okay. my PNL is great . unlike your fake PNL
otherwise it goes to YES
otherwise it goes to YES
if it was the case, then this market is DOA.
if it was the case, then this market is DOA.
show me a proof that before 8th april, the website updated the active list of players and removed Wenbo. or there was credible reporting available that Wenbo was removed.
show me a proof that before 8th april, the website updated the active list of players and removed Wenbo. or there was credible reporting available that Wenbo was removed.
ofcourse now we know that he left before the creation
ofcourse now we know that he left before the creation
resolution source is mainly the website
resolution source is mainly the website
also, according to rules it should resolve YES. it's very very clear.
also, according to rules it should resolve YES. it's very very clear.
we have no proof that when the market was created, what did the website showed. so we can assume that on the website, he was still a part of the team, and website got updated post 8th april. hence the rules are written in such a way. and burden of proof falls into NO holders to proof that it wasn't the case.
we have no proof that when the market was created, what did the website showed. so we can assume that on the website, he was still a part of the team, and website got updated post 8th april. hence the rules are written in such a way. and burden of proof falls into NO holders to proof that it wasn't the case.
at 0:39 mins. lip reading. he didn't say "fight", or atleast it's totally inaudible.
at 0:39 mins. lip reading. he didn't say "fight", or atleast it's totally inaudible.
https://x.com/blue_eyes/status/2066394324242428202?s=46&t=F7w-Nvd5QdJnyNZr9kPmvg
https://x.com/blue_eyes/status/2066394324242428202?s=46&t=F7w-Nvd5QdJnyNZr9kPmvg
but we have 3hrs till market is over
but we have 3hrs till market is over
if there is some other clip, then i'm not aware.
if there is some other clip, then i'm not aware.
none. he's totally inaudible. only lip reading that he said "good fight"
none. he's totally inaudible. only lip reading that he said "good fight"
https://discord.com/channels/718590743446290492/1423040917052461096/1516153264272310362
https://discord.com/channels/718590743446290492/1423040917052461096/1516153264272310362
no, disputing is against my rules
no, disputing is against my rules
https://polymarket.com/event/what-will-trump-say-during-ufc-freedom-250-20260611142620117 fight market is proposed as YES. But trump has not audible said fight.
https://polymarket.com/event/what-will-trump-say-during-ufc-freedom-250-20260611142620117 fight market is proposed as YES. But trump has not audible said fight.
and iran is saying "not today", they are in a way, it will be tomorrow.
and iran is saying "not today", they are in a way, it will be tomorrow.
i feel, even without signing, trump will just annouce it. becaz it's his birthday
i feel, even without signing, trump will just annouce it. becaz it's his birthday
fu**, how the f** i reached there. i was crazily searching abt this market
fu**, how the f** i reached there. i was crazily searching abt this market
I had another account which i stopped using 6 months ago
I had another account which i stopped using 6 months ago
bm refresh
bm refresh
300k NO holder sold his position
300k NO holder sold his position
yaa. nice gain. but i wish he held till 2c atleast
yaa. nice gain. but i wish he held till 2c atleast
but ya he will be covered at 0.5c
but ya he will be covered at 0.5c
that 900usd was not free. he bought for 500usd in total.
that 900usd was not free. he bought for 500usd in total.
thonker, why r u selling ? your sell at 5x won't even cover the dipute bond you paid. let it pump to 2c atleast
thonker, why r u selling ? your sell at 5x won't even cover the dipute bond you paid. let it pump to 2c atleast
thonker why you sold 200k shares, if you believe your dispute
thonker why you sold 200k shares, if you believe your dispute