聊天记录
共 4 条，显示第 1-4 条
Discovered a major bug with end-of-session pending orders. In the BTC 5-minute trading market, I placed a buy order for 10,000 units at a price of 99, and it first filled 3,000 units against the existing sell orders. Logically, the remaining sell orders should have been filled by my order, but that didn't happen. After I filled 3,000 units, there were still over 4,000 sell orders continuing to appear. As the highest-priority buy order, mine wasn't filled. I want to ask—who filled those orders instead? Did someone discover a vulnerability that allows them to get priority execution at the end of the session? If that's the case, wouldn't they be taking everything at the end of every session? That would be terribly unfair to those of us who take on the risk of going to zero by placing such orders
Discovered a major bug with end-of-session pending orders. In the BTC 5-minute trading market, I placed a buy order for 10,000 units at a price of 99, and it first filled 3,000 units against the existing sell orders. Logically, the remaining sell orders should have been filled by my order, but that didn't happen. After I filled 3,000 units, there were still over 4,000 sell orders continuing to appear. As the highest-priority buy order, mine wasn't filled. I want to ask—who filled those orders instead? Did someone discover a vulnerability that allows them to get priority execution at the end of the session? If that's the case, wouldn't they be taking everything at the end of every session? That would be terribly unfair to those of us who take on the risk of going to zero by placing such orders
Discovered a major bug with end-of-session pending orders. In the BTC 5-minute trading market, I placed a buy order for 10,000 units at a price of 99, and it first filled 3,000 units against the existing sell orders. Logically, the remaining sell orders should have been filled by my order, but that didn't happen. After I filled 3,000 units, there were still over 4,000 sell orders continuing to appear. As the highest-priority buy order, mine wasn't filled. I want to ask—who filled those orders instead? Did someone discover a vulnerability that allows them to get priority execution at the end of the session? If that's the case, wouldn't they be taking everything at the end of every session? That would be terribly unfair to those of us who take on the risk of going to zero by placing such orders
Discovered a major bug with end-of-session pending orders. In the BTC 5-minute trading market, I placed a buy order for 10,000 units at a price of 99, and it first filled 3,000 units against the existing sell orders. Logically, the remaining sell orders should have been filled by my order, but that didn't happen. After I filled 3,000 units, there were still over 4,000 sell orders continuing to appear. As the highest-priority buy order, mine wasn't filled. I want to ask—who filled those orders instead? Did someone discover a vulnerability that allows them to get priority execution at the end of the session? If that's the case, wouldn't they be taking everything at the end of every session? That would be terribly unfair to those of us who take on the risk of going to zero by placing such orders
Discovered a major bug with end-of-session pending orders. In the BTC 5-minute trading market, I placed a buy order for 10,000 units at a price of 99, and it first filled 3,000 units against the existing sell orders. Logically, the remaining sell orders should have been filled by my order, but that didn't happen. After I filled 3,000 units, there were still over 4,000 sell orders continuing to appear. As the highest-priority buy order, mine wasn't filled. I want to ask—who filled those orders instead? Did someone discover a vulnerability that allows them to get priority execution at the end of the session? If that's the case, wouldn't they be taking everything at the end of every session? That would be terribly unfair to those of us who take on the risk of going to zero by placing such orders
Discovered a major bug with end-of-session pending orders. In the BTC 5-minute trading market, I placed a buy order for 10,000 units at a price of 99, and it first filled 3,000 units against the existing sell orders. Logically, the remaining sell orders should have been filled by my order, but that didn't happen. After I filled 3,000 units, there were still over 4,000 sell orders continuing to appear. As the highest-priority buy order, mine wasn't filled. I want to ask—who filled those orders instead? Did someone discover a vulnerability that allows them to get priority execution at the end of the session? If that's the case, wouldn't they be taking everything at the end of every session? That would be terribly unfair to those of us who take on the risk of going to zero by placing such orders
Discovered a major bug with end-of-session pending orders. In the BTC 5-minute trading market, I placed a buy order for 10,000 units at a price of 99, and it first filled 3,000 units against the existing sell orders. Logically, the remaining sell orders should have been filled by my order, but that didn't happen. After I filled 3,000 units, there were still over 4,000 sell orders continuing to appear. As the highest-priority buy order, mine wasn't filled. I want to ask—who filled those orders instead? Did someone discover a vulnerability that allows them to get priority execution at the end of the session? If that's the case, wouldn't they be taking everything at the end of every session? That would be terribly unfair to those of us who take on the risk of going to zero by placing such orders
Discovered a major bug with end-of-session pending orders. In the BTC 5-minute trading market, I placed a buy order for 10,000 units at a price of 99, and it first filled 3,000 units against the existing sell orders. Logically, the remaining sell orders should have been filled by my order, but that didn't happen. After I filled 3,000 units, there were still over 4,000 sell orders continuing to appear. As the highest-priority buy order, mine wasn't filled. I want to ask—who filled those orders instead? Did someone discover a vulnerability that allows them to get priority execution at the end of the session? If that's the case, wouldn't they be taking everything at the end of every session? That would be terribly unfair to those of us who take on the risk of going to zero by placing such orders
Polymarket