Kalshiwhats the strategy exactly?
whats the strategy exactly?
ltj参与话题 2消息总数 28
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 28 条，显示第 1-28 条i dont *really* follow the jump there, but ok
i dont *really* follow the jump there, but ok
bro who cares. resources are limited. the point of an exchange is to facilitate transactions. some people aren't facilitating transactions as much as other people. thats why there are API tiers. getting shadowbanned for some amount of time is just a new tier below basic. if u get demoted, earn it back by getting better
bro who cares. resources are limited. the point of an exchange is to facilitate transactions. some people aren't facilitating transactions as much as other people. thats why there are API tiers. getting shadowbanned for some amount of time is just a new tier below basic. if u get demoted, earn it back by getting better
not a slippery slope at all
not a slippery slope at all
they're dealing with an insane influx of volume and also dealing with a lot of people taking up resources but not facilitating transactions. resources are limited. if someone posts 100k quotes a day but trades 5 times, and your quotes are limited... OK? just ban them??
they're dealing with an insane influx of volume and also dealing with a lot of people taking up resources but not facilitating transactions. resources are limited. if someone posts 100k quotes a day but trades 5 times, and your quotes are limited... OK? just ban them??
they may be doing so against the rules!!
they may be doing so against the rules!!
i disagree that every RFQ is definitively a bonafide transaction
i disagree that every RFQ is definitively a bonafide transaction
yea there was a guy who rfq'ed a bunch of delta intensive spreads in COB then hit them all simultaneously across cme and cboe.. idk circa 2021 or 22?
yea there was a guy who rfq'ed a bunch of delta intensive spreads in COB then hit them all simultaneously across cme and cboe.. idk circa 2021 or 22?
CME
CME
i still havent accused him of anything, i was just asking what his actual fill pct is. and ive literally repeated the rule three times
i still havent accused him of anything, i was just asking what his actual fill pct is. and ive literally repeated the rule three times
sorry if that offends the sharp taker
sorry if that offends the sharp taker
it can be! .. if they think you're not requesting quotes for the purpose of making a bona fide transaction. if its true they banned the bottom percentile of makers and takers, I think they're justified in doing so
it can be! .. if they think you're not requesting quotes for the purpose of making a bona fide transaction. if its true they banned the bottom percentile of makers and takers, I think they're justified in doing so
so why not limit the people who are doing it? on purpose or not on purpose
so why not limit the people who are doing it? on purpose or not on purpose
if it can happen on CME it can for sure happen on kalshi
if it can happen on CME it can for sure happen on kalshi
there are ways for single people to put strains on large exchanges, even if not maliciously
there are ways for single people to put strains on large exchanges, even if not maliciously
believe it or not, wasting messages and trying to pick off liquidity providers is not essential to Kalshi existing. they care about liquidity providers and rec flow more than the sharp taker trying to pick off MMs
believe it or not, wasting messages and trying to pick off liquidity providers is not essential to Kalshi existing. they care about liquidity providers and rec flow more than the sharp taker trying to pick off MMs
i dont know, but im also not a guy getting capped out for requesting too many quotes a week
i dont know, but im also not a guy getting capped out for requesting too many quotes a week
bigrule is that every RFQ has to be for the purpose of making a bonafide trade. not really possible to know your intent, but you could imagine the guy trading 1 out of 1000 rfqs is less likely to be RFQing for the purpose of bonafide transactions every time than the guy trading 100 out of 1000
bigrule is that every RFQ has to be for the purpose of making a bonafide trade. not really possible to know your intent, but you could imagine the guy trading 1 out of 1000 rfqs is less likely to be RFQing for the purpose of bonafide transactions every time than the guy trading 100 out of 1000
Of course it matters. Have you read the rulebook? How strong is your actual intention to trade when you’re RFQing something?
Of course it matters. Have you read the rulebook? How strong is your actual intention to trade when you’re RFQing something?
thousands is an understatement. but realistically how many are u expressing an opinion on? how many out of a thousand combos you quote do u actually accept
thousands is an understatement. but realistically how many are u expressing an opinion on? how many out of a thousand combos you quote do u actually accept
very surprised at this. honestly thought the last change gave everyone enough mobility to move up tiers
very surprised at this. honestly thought the last change gave everyone enough mobility to move up tiers
Didn’t they have this feature like a year ago? And they got rid of it?
Didn’t they have this feature like a year ago? And they got rid of it?
ya that’s the joke I was making. Everyone just tests in prod
ya that’s the joke I was making. Everyone just tests in prod
…there’s a demo platform??
…there’s a demo platform??
which markets/prices arent working for u? jc
which markets/prices arent working for u? jc
and get a job
and get a job
u should delete all ur gambling apps
u should delete all ur gambling apps
alhamdulillah okc will win
alhamdulillah okc will win