Polymarketfor how long, nobody knows...
for how long, nobody knows...
50-Pence参与话题 6消息总数 460
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 460 条，显示第 301-350 条dont worry you get an extension
dont worry you get an extension
there are 6 dweebs that have read this
there are 6 dweebs that have read this
too many makrets means there is no market
too many makrets means there is no market
too many markets
too many markets
nobody reads shit
nobody reads shit
its not a key on the keyboard
its not a key on the keyboard
its twice as long
its twice as long
its not even a key on the keyboard
its not even a key on the keyboard
how else do you exxpress a desire?
how else do you exxpress a desire?
I dont even understand the P4 argument tbh
I dont even understand the P4 argument tbh
on nothing
on nothing
theyre not voting to vote again
theyre not voting to vote again
not just any kind of referendum
not just any kind of referendum
the referendum is to establish a desire for independence
the referendum is to establish a desire for independence
why is it not?
why is it not?
seems like clear p2
seems like clear p2
that was about hez
that was about hez
Regardless of going into effect
Regardless of going into effect
link?
link?
by July 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
by July 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
✅ ❌ Just pick one bro
✅ ❌ Just pick one bro
The most recent X post (tweet) by President Gustavo Petro (@petrogustavo) directly disputing or questioning the election results (specifically the preliminary/preconteo count and alleged irregularities/fraud in Colombia’s May 31, 2026 presidential first-round elections) is this one from June 2, 2026, at 15:40 GMT: “Aquí entrego las 5.300 mesas atípicas en dónde hay mucho más sufragantes que los posibles físicamente. El escrutinio sobre estás mesas debe hacerse no solo contando de nuevo los votos sino comparando los listados de votantes con el E11 y con el censo electoral oficial entregado hace dos meses.” Post ID: 2061835385638985872 (This is a follow-up in the same conversation/thread as his longer explanatory posts that day.) Context of his recent posts on this topic (all from June 2, 2026) Petro has been publicly challenging the preliminary results (preconteo) from a private firm (the “hermanos Bautista” software), claiming: The software/census was illegally modified on May 26 (adding ~885,400 extra voter IDs not in the official census closed two months earlier). Extra polling stations and tables were added. There are ~5,300 “atypical” tables with impossibly high voter turnout (hundreds of votes per table, some reportedly 700+), which account for much of the lead by Abelardo de la Espriella over Iván Cepeda (the candidate aligned with Petro’s movement). He does not accept the preliminary numbers as binding and wants full scrutiny by comparing voter lists against the official census and E-11 forms. He says the final official results (from judicial scrutiny commissions) are what matter. His key posts that day form a thread starting with a long detailed explanation (post ID 2061792208575938844) and including follow-ups like the one above and another about not rushing the scrutiny. Summary No newer posts from Petro since June 2 match keywords related to the election dispute, fraud claims, preconteo, registrador, escrutinio, Cepeda, or Espriella (confirmed via searches up to June 4). His more recent activity (June 4) has been on unrelated topics. These posts are part of his ongoing public challenge to the preliminary count while the official scrutiny process continues.
The most recent X post (tweet) by President Gustavo Petro (@petrogustavo) directly disputing or questioning the election results (specifically the preliminary/preconteo count and alleged irregularities/fraud in Colombia’s May 31, 2026 presidential first-round elections) is this one from June 2, 2026, at 15:40 GMT: “Aquí entrego las 5.300 mesas atípicas en dónde hay mucho más sufragantes que los posibles físicamente. El escrutinio sobre estás mesas debe hacerse no solo contando de nuevo los votos sino comparando los listados de votantes con el E11 y con el censo electoral oficial entregado hace dos meses.” Post ID: 2061835385638985872 (This is a follow-up in the same conversation/thread as his longer explanatory posts that day.) Context of his recent posts on this topic (all from June 2, 2026) Petro has been publicly challenging the preliminary results (preconteo) from a private firm (the “hermanos Bautista” software), claiming: The software/census was illegally modified on May 26 (adding ~885,400 extra voter IDs not in the official census closed two months earlier). Extra polling stations and tables were added. There are ~5,300 “atypical” tables with impossibly high voter turnout (hundreds of votes per table, some reportedly 700+), which account for much of the lead by Abelardo de la Espriella over Iván Cepeda (the candidate aligned with Petro’s movement). He does not accept the preliminary numbers as binding and wants full scrutiny by comparing voter lists against the official census and E-11 forms. He says the final official results (from judicial scrutiny commissions) are what matter. His key posts that day form a thread starting with a long detailed explanation (post ID 2061792208575938844) and including follow-ups like the one above and another about not rushing the scrutiny. Summary No newer posts from Petro since June 2 match keywords related to the election dispute, fraud claims, preconteo, registrador, escrutinio, Cepeda, or Espriella (confirmed via searches up to June 4). His more recent activity (June 4) has been on unrelated topics. These posts are part of his ongoing public challenge to the preliminary count while the official scrutiny process continues.
some volunteers are actual voluntears
some volunteers are actual voluntears
probably first day of summer school
probably first day of summer school
He's a volunteer
He's a volunteer
tree, woods, sound
tree, woods, sound
why would he be fired?
why would he be fired?
where would we bury the codified rules though?
where would we bury the codified rules though?
This is polymarkets fault
This is polymarkets fault
stoner vote
stoner vote
(send him tip)
(send him tip)
MEP says its the 2006 agreement
MEP says its the 2006 agreement
where there is no ceasefire, any new ceasefire extends the deadline from no deadline at all
where there is no ceasefire, any new ceasefire extends the deadline from no deadline at all
cause its a different ceasesfire
cause its a different ceasesfire
except here its with your first wife
except here its with your first wife
so theyre reviewing their marketing plans?
so theyre reviewing their marketing plans?
The rule explicitly states a qualifying process can apply "only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g., capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria)." Frontier models fall under this definition.
The rule explicitly states a qualifying process can apply "only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g., capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria)." Frontier models fall under this definition.
is there now a process for frontier models to be reveiewed prior to release?
is there now a process for frontier models to be reveiewed prior to release?
doesnt have to be mandatory
doesnt have to be mandatory
the rules require some process for review prior to release.
the rules require some process for review prior to release.
Right now if you go to government and ask them if they want to review your model before release, there is no process in place, it is ad-hoc. In the future, there will be an established process.
Right now if you go to government and ask them if they want to review your model before release, there is no process in place, it is ad-hoc. In the future, there will be an established process.
The rule has no requirements. review of unreleased models qualifies
The rule has no requirements. review of unreleased models qualifies
it is specifically for unreleased models
it is specifically for unreleased models
and its under b, frontier models
and its under b, frontier models
the government has selected models that want to voluntarily partipacte
the government has selected models that want to voluntarily partipacte
its only for unreleased models
its only for unreleased models
betmoar
betmoar
launching strengthens their claim to the mark
launching strengthens their claim to the mark
like that is the barrier\
like that is the barrier\