PolymarketIt just won't reduce any load on the clob then, so why bother with rate limits in the first place?
It just won't reduce any load on the clob then, so why bother with rate limits in the first place?
tomwiseseal参与话题 1消息总数 9
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 9 条，显示第 1-9 条But any rate limit that doesn't depend on volume is effectively no limit, as you just open more accounts. So the whole rate limit effort would be futile
But any rate limit that doesn't depend on volume is effectively no limit, as you just open more accounts. So the whole rate limit effort would be futile
It should be scaled by volume somehow
It should be scaled by volume somehow
Everyone getting the same rate limits wouldn't really work, as the cost of another account and IP is effectively zero and you could multiply your rate limits like that
Everyone getting the same rate limits wouldn't really work, as the cost of another account and IP is effectively zero and you could multiply your rate limits like that
Lmao
Lmao
Asymmetric accountability is whats ruining academia
Asymmetric accountability is whats ruining academia
Mustafa got caught by the Tsinghua Bamboo slips. You can't make this up lmao
Mustafa got caught by the Tsinghua Bamboo slips. You can't make this up lmao
There is precedent in platforms (dydx, HL, uniswap etc) heavily favouring makers and liquidity providers. An airdrop is not a democratic wealth distribution, and the LTV of makers is simply much higher
There is precedent in platforms (dydx, HL, uniswap etc) heavily favouring makers and liquidity providers. An airdrop is not a democratic wealth distribution, and the LTV of makers is simply much higher
Fees will be "an order of magnitude" lower if you pay with $POLY
Fees will be "an order of magnitude" lower if you pay with $POLY