PolymarketI dont have answer from email 10 day. How many i need wait??
I dont have answer from email 10 day. How many i need wait??
Lubomir参与话题 1消息总数 6
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 6 条，显示第 1-6 条So, I understand that PolyMarket doesn't have support? They told me to write to an email address in the chat, but I won't receive a reply. No one can help here. So, PolyMarket made a mistake by ending a match that was stopped with a win for one of the teams. People lost money. And the team isn't responsible for this mistake?
So, I understand that PolyMarket doesn't have support? They told me to write to an email address in the chat, but I won't receive a reply. No one can help here. So, PolyMarket made a mistake by ending a match that was stopped with a win for one of the teams. People lost money. And the team isn't responsible for this mistake?
The Guardian reported the referee abandoned the match early. TalkSport reported the match was abandoned and that Denmark led 2-1 at the time. Fox Sports labels the match as CANCELLED. Global Sports Archive lists the match status as Suspended. EU-Football lists the match as Denmark 2-1 but states “the match was suspended.”
The Guardian reported the referee abandoned the match early. TalkSport reported the match was abandoned and that Denmark led 2-1 at the time. Fox Sports labels the match as CANCELLED. Global Sports Archive lists the match status as Suspended. EU-Football lists the match as Denmark 2-1 but states “the match was suspended.”
<@941405798096076880> Because of your mistake and violation of your own rules (which state that an abandoned match is decided as a draw), people lost money. How could you count an abandoned match as a win for one of the teams? This has never happened in football. Are you kidding me?
<@941405798096076880> Because of your mistake and violation of your own rules (which state that an abandoned match is decided as a draw), people lost money. How could you count an abandoned match as a win for one of the teams? This has never happened in football. Are you kidding me?
I request a re-evaluation of this resolution. Because the match was abandoned and not completed, the only correct resolution according to the original rules is a "No" result (or a Void/Refund for all participants). Resolving this market as "Yes" based on a retracted, automated ranking error is an unfair practice that has caused direct financial loss to users who followed the published rules.
I request a re-evaluation of this resolution. Because the match was abandoned and not completed, the only correct resolution according to the original rules is a "No" result (or a Void/Refund for all participants). Resolving this market as "Yes" based on a retracted, automated ranking error is an unfair practice that has caused direct financial loss to users who followed the published rules.
<@1457826843766947977> <@1371499857310912544> <@378264721171939330> <@106438990923579392> I am writing to formally protest the resolution of the "Denmark vs. Ukraine" market. The resolution is based on a fundamental error and contradicts the market's own rules. 1. Violation of Explicit Market Rules: The market rules clearly stated: "If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 'No'." Additionally, the rules required the outcome to be determined within "90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time." The match was officially abandoned at the 65th minute, and the 90-minute requirement was never met. 2. Reliance on Erroneous Automated Data: The platform resolved this market based on a temporary, automated "FT 2-1" status displayed in the FIFA World Ranking table. This was a clear technical glitch in FIFA’s automated reporting system, which is not an official match protocol. 3. FIFA Has Retracted the Data: As of today (June 8), FIFA has officially removed the Denmark vs. Ukraine match from the "Latest Results" section of both teams' profiles. This proves that FIFA does not recognize this event as a completed official match. The platform based its resolution on data that the governing body itself has since retracted. 4. Failure to Respect Official Match Status: The official FIFA Match Centre (the definitive source for event statistics) has maintained the status as "Interrupted" since the incident. Choosing to ignore this official status in favor of a temporary ranking table glitch, and subsequently adding an "Additional Context" note after the fact to justify the resolution, constitutes a breach of the original contractual terms of this market.
<@1457826843766947977> <@1371499857310912544> <@378264721171939330> <@106438990923579392> I am writing to formally protest the resolution of the "Denmark vs. Ukraine" market. The resolution is based on a fundamental error and contradicts the market's own rules. 1. Violation of Explicit Market Rules: The market rules clearly stated: "If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 'No'." Additionally, the rules required the outcome to be determined within "90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time." The match was officially abandoned at the 65th minute, and the 90-minute requirement was never met. 2. Reliance on Erroneous Automated Data: The platform resolved this market based on a temporary, automated "FT 2-1" status displayed in the FIFA World Ranking table. This was a clear technical glitch in FIFA’s automated reporting system, which is not an official match protocol. 3. FIFA Has Retracted the Data: As of today (June 8), FIFA has officially removed the Denmark vs. Ukraine match from the "Latest Results" section of both teams' profiles. This proves that FIFA does not recognize this event as a completed official match. The platform based its resolution on data that the governing body itself has since retracted. 4. Failure to Respect Official Match Status: The official FIFA Match Centre (the definitive source for event statistics) has maintained the status as "Interrupted" since the incident. Choosing to ignore this official status in favor of a temporary ranking table glitch, and subsequently adding an "Additional Context" note after the fact to justify the resolution, constitutes a breach of the original contractual terms of this market.