秋田预测市场 · Discord 审计

Alumi参与话题 0消息总数 12

该用户的聊天记录定位。

Reset

聊天记录

共 12 条,显示第 1-12 条
Alumi 2026-06-11 21:25:51 Hyperliquid

found something that'd be useful for you guys

found something that'd be useful for you guys

Alumi 2026-06-01 18:43:00 Hyperliquid

20k lines of code

20k lines of code

Alumi 2026-06-01 18:40:32 Hyperliquid

and you base that off what? the fact that the number are small doesn't matter. what matters is that they could potentially be made more efficient, i.e., resulting in greater welfare. note that Citadel is lobbying SEC to lower tick sizes. your trading is a blip in the market, so it doesn't matter to you, but again, it does matter to meaningful players

and you base that off what? the fact that the number are small doesn't matter. what matters is that they could potentially be made more efficient, i.e., resulting in greater welfare. note that Citadel is lobbying SEC to lower tick sizes. your trading is a blip in the market, so it doesn't matter to you, but again, it does matter to meaningful players

Alumi 2026-06-01 18:36:33 Hyperliquid

I don't know why you're criticizng my research. I understand that this doesn't matter to you as a trader, probably holding positions (of a miserable size) for a long time, but it certainly matters to instutitional investors and hyperliquid itself

I don't know why you're criticizng my research. I understand that this doesn't matter to you as a trader, probably holding positions (of a miserable size) for a long time, but it certainly matters to instutitional investors and hyperliquid itself

Alumi 2026-06-01 18:28:40 Hyperliquid

there's some SEC research suggesting the same things that I do. It just takes time. Penny size rule is from 2005. Crypto is different & hyperliquid's formula wasn't decided on in 2005. So, it should be more efficient, and it doesn't seem to be, relying on the same arbitrary nonsense

there's some SEC research suggesting the same things that I do. It just takes time. Penny size rule is from 2005. Crypto is different & hyperliquid's formula wasn't decided on in 2005. So, it should be more efficient, and it doesn't seem to be, relying on the same arbitrary nonsense

Alumi 2026-06-01 18:22:43 Hyperliquid

i'm also researching the spread on other assets, might be too low in their case hope to get info from hyperliquid on their reasoning, as I don't want to embarass myself in the research paper, talking about how hyperliquid is inefficient and whatnot, losing however much money

i'm also researching the spread on other assets, might be too low in their case hope to get info from hyperliquid on their reasoning, as I don't want to embarass myself in the research paper, talking about how hyperliquid is inefficient and whatnot, losing however much money

Alumi 2026-06-01 18:19:11 Hyperliquid

yes

yes

Alumi 2026-06-01 18:15:20 Hyperliquid

this https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api/tick-and-lot-size <@868083969537757215> that's it (just rephrase it) the spread is unjustifiable imo deadweight cost = deadweight loss just a difference in perspective cost emphasizes the burden on an entity

this https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api/tick-and-lot-size <@868083969537757215> that's it (just rephrase it) the spread is unjustifiable imo deadweight cost = deadweight loss just a difference in perspective cost emphasizes the burden on an entity

Alumi 2026-06-01 18:12:07 Hyperliquid

I wrote a ticket about it (16392), hoping that they give me some resources. Like, maybe I'm wrong. They didn't pull this formula out of nowhere. But, maybe this was a technological decision, not an economic one, which is why the deadweight cost exists

I wrote a ticket about it (16392), hoping that they give me some resources. Like, maybe I'm wrong. They didn't pull this formula out of nowhere. But, maybe this was a technological decision, not an economic one, which is why the deadweight cost exists

Alumi 2026-06-01 18:09:14 Hyperliquid

besides research demonstrating this, also just intuitively the formula makes no sense. Like, I don't see any possible reasons why it is what it is, which is why I'm asking here to hope to understand their reasoning

besides research demonstrating this, also just intuitively the formula makes no sense. Like, I don't see any possible reasons why it is what it is, which is why I'm asking here to hope to understand their reasoning

Alumi 2026-06-01 18:04:02 Hyperliquid

causes deadweight cost on btc, as an example.

causes deadweight cost on btc, as an example.

Alumi 2026-06-01 18:01:47 Hyperliquid

would you guys please recommend me any resources where the design decisions behind hyperliquid are explained? for example, I'm pretty sure that the tick size formula is ass

would you guys please recommend me any resources where the design decisions behind hyperliquid are explained? for example, I'm pretty sure that the tick size formula is ass