Polymarketwhich potentially leads to secession?
which potentially leads to secession?
arbguy参与话题 16消息总数 1318
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 1318 条，显示第 1051-1100 条does this referendum not concern potential secession?
does this referendum not concern potential secession?
so if it doesn't pass you think there is a desire to secede?
so if it doesn't pass you think there is a desire to secede?
please don't, that would be a disaster!
please don't, that would be a disaster!
you don't think you can infer the populations desire to secede after the vote?
you don't think you can infer the populations desire to secede after the vote?
def one of the easiest proposals i've seen in a while yes
def one of the easiest proposals i've seen in a while yes
option 1 certainly establishes a desire to avoid poison
option 1 certainly establishes a desire to avoid poison
I didn't realize canadian courts had adjudicated whether the market rules were met or a politicians statement had any bearing on anything
I didn't realize canadian courts had adjudicated whether the market rules were met or a politicians statement had any bearing on anything
you're not making any actual points relevant to the resolution of this market
you're not making any actual points relevant to the resolution of this market
for those with referendum fetishes
for those with referendum fetishes
political statements are legal arguments?
political statements are legal arguments?
everything is computer
everything is computer
also not required, explicitely
also not required, explicitely
who says it has to?
who says it has to?
option 1 unequivocally shows a desire to remain
option 1 unequivocally shows a desire to remain
some people seem to think that doesn't concern the potential cecession of Alberta or establish what the desire is
some people seem to think that doesn't concern the potential cecession of Alberta or establish what the desire is
some people might just enjoy marriage counseling!
some people might just enjoy marriage counseling!
do you want to remain in your marriage or attend marriage counseling in order to decide whether to file for divorce
do you want to remain in your marriage or attend marriage counseling in order to decide whether to file for divorce
i never said anything about non-binding
i never said anything about non-binding
if you didn't understand my point it's hopeless
if you didn't understand my point it's hopeless
O.C. 160/2026 sets out the following question and orders the results of the referendum on this question are not to be binding. Electors will mark an “x” next to the options of their choice on their ballots. Should Alberta remain a province in Canada, or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada? Option 1: Alberta should remain a province in Canada. Option 2: The Government of Alberta should commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada.
O.C. 160/2026 sets out the following question and orders the results of the referendum on this question are not to be binding. Electors will mark an “x” next to the options of their choice on their ballots. Should Alberta remain a province in Canada, or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada? Option 1: Alberta should remain a province in Canada. Option 2: The Government of Alberta should commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada.
lol "O.C. 160/2026 sets out the following question and orders the results of the referendum on this question are not to be binding. Electors will mark an “x” next to the options of their choice on their ballots. Should Alberta remain a province in Canada, or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada? Option 1: Alberta should remain a province in Canada. Option 2: The Government of Alberta should commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada."
lol "O.C. 160/2026 sets out the following question and orders the results of the referendum on this question are not to be binding. Electors will mark an “x” next to the options of their choice on their ballots. Should Alberta remain a province in Canada, or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada? Option 1: Alberta should remain a province in Canada. Option 2: The Government of Alberta should commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada."
makes sense
makes sense
are you esl?
are you esl?
it's quite literally a referendum concerning a potential secession, notards have lost it
it's quite literally a referendum concerning a potential secession, notards have lost it
the rules literally say you don't need an actual referendum only one which establishes desire
the rules literally say you don't need an actual referendum only one which establishes desire
pack it in wild
pack it in wild
lol thonker is on no now?
lol thonker is on no now?
no wonder my bids aren't getting hit
no wonder my bids aren't getting hit
wat
wat
it's the first step in a framework and it establishes desire
it's the first step in a framework and it establishes desire
it's a vote concerning apples
it's a vote concerning apples
option A, I do not like apples, Option B, i want to hold a vote explicitely on whether I like apples. This still establishes whethere there is a lack of taste for apples
option A, I do not like apples, Option B, i want to hold a vote explicitely on whether I like apples. This still establishes whethere there is a lack of taste for apples
to vote on whether to stay in canada or not
to vote on whether to stay in canada or not
a vote for no is a vote to stay in canada
a vote for no is a vote to stay in canada
but the question about the question concerns secession and establishes whether there is a lack of desire to secede
but the question about the question concerns secession and establishes whether there is a lack of desire to secede
creating a vote is step 1 in a framework to secede
creating a vote is step 1 in a framework to secede
because it directly indicates a lack of desire to leave
because it directly indicates a lack of desire to leave
are you canadian?
are you canadian?
but voting to stay necessarily indicates you want to stay which is a lack of desire to leave
but voting to stay necessarily indicates you want to stay which is a lack of desire to leave
if you desire to stay there is no desire to seperate. This establishes that
if you desire to stay there is no desire to seperate. This establishes that
how can you secede if you remain in canada and hold no referendum?
how can you secede if you remain in canada and hold no referendum?
it establishes a desire to stay in canada
it establishes a desire to stay in canada
the choice literally says remain in canada
the choice literally says remain in canada
that's a paraphrase of the rules? wtf are you talking about
that's a paraphrase of the rules? wtf are you talking about
"remain in canada" is literally one of the options
"remain in canada" is literally one of the options
he does in fact seem retarded
he does in fact seem retarded
the referendum does set a framework and establishes whether there is a lack of desire for independance
the referendum does set a framework and establishes whether there is a lack of desire for independance
the problem with wild's argument is that while it's true that voting in favor of a referendum does not necessarily indicate a desire for secession, voting for "remain in canada" clearly indicates a desire not to secede and therefore establishes the province's (lack of) desire for independance and the referendum in question clearly concerns the province's potential secession from Canada.
the problem with wild's argument is that while it's true that voting in favor of a referendum does not necessarily indicate a desire for secession, voting for "remain in canada" clearly indicates a desire not to secede and therefore establishes the province's (lack of) desire for independance and the referendum in question clearly concerns the province's potential secession from Canada.
america generally doesn't let criminal retards into the country
america generally doesn't let criminal retards into the country