Polymarketin all seriousness it does look like the deal is legit, but I don't think they will get all the approvals before the 15th
in all seriousness it does look like the deal is legit, but I don't think they will get all the approvals before the 15th
yeon参与话题 6消息总数 346
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 346 条，显示第 151-200 条lindsey graham is furiously sending text messages to trump rn, peacetards are cooked
lindsey graham is furiously sending text messages to trump rn, peacetards are cooked
wait so trump did all of this bombing and in the end he's the one who caved? <:ICANT:1055828905031909467>
wait so trump did all of this bombing and in the end he's the one who caved? <:ICANT:1055828905031909467>
just wondering
just wondering
arman do you know what the definition of insanity is?
arman do you know what the definition of insanity is?
https://polymarket.com/profile/0xAF2383B66194112D57AC196B00AB25f78c17aA95 all of them
https://polymarket.com/profile/0xAF2383B66194112D57AC196B00AB25f78c17aA95 all of them
as of now, it honestly sounds like trump just chickened out of strikes. nothing has been agreed Iran just submitted another draft is all they are saying
as of now, it honestly sounds like trump just chickened out of strikes. nothing has been agreed Iran just submitted another draft is all they are saying
if they can finish the deal by june then it's probably good, just a question of if iran will agree
if they can finish the deal by june then it's probably good, just a question of if iran will agree
both of those counted vro
both of those counted vro
if trump said "they should sign the deal then they can go off and say I hate trump", is trump endorsing that he hates himself? stop the cap
if trump said "they should sign the deal then they can go off and say I hate trump", is trump endorsing that he hates himself? stop the cap
there's no need to even argue this one. it's the easiest clarification for No
there's no need to even argue this one. it's the easiest clarification for No
yes more kharg island brackets please. trump just posted on truth social he wants to take it
yes more kharg island brackets please. trump just posted on truth social he wants to take it
if he says he will resign after election it counts too
if he says he will resign after election it counts too
but I think it's a decent lottery
but I think it's a decent lottery
no lol im just jk. I have that mostly from before
no lol im just jk. I have that mostly from before
alpha (or fade me if you dare)
alpha (or fade me if you dare)
his defence secretary just resigned
his defence secretary just resigned
nah he's going to lay out a plan to resign after leadership campaign very soon
nah he's going to lay out a plan to resign after leadership campaign very soon
they all say they won't leave, but starmer is on very shaky ground right now
they all say they won't leave, but starmer is on very shaky ground right now
however considering starmer out by august is trading at like 50c, starmer Y is a cheaper alternative
however considering starmer out by august is trading at like 50c, starmer Y is a cheaper alternative
petro will be out in august
petro will be out in august
basically that market means, if you are scheduled to depart due to an election, you are not "out" until you actually leave office
basically that market means, if you are scheduled to depart due to an election, you are not "out" until you actually leave office
<@1272383282687905939>
<@1272383282687905939>
yes it's already confirmed
yes it's already confirmed
it shows here
it shows here
forget where I saw exactly, but this is one example: https://x.com/dolfiniran/status/2064829887517487445 at least says iranians believe there is a regime change plan coming
forget where I saw exactly, but this is one example: https://x.com/dolfiniran/status/2064829887517487445 at least says iranians believe there is a regime change plan coming
there's actually a reason for this, there were some reports on iranian tg channels of a coup rumors afaik
there's actually a reason for this, there were some reports on iranian tg channels of a coup rumors afaik
yes but they were possibly at the same place and shuttling messages, just not clear reporting on the details
yes but they were possibly at the same place and shuttling messages, just not clear reporting on the details
ok maybe not scam but unclear reporting
ok maybe not scam but unclear reporting
there's a possible scam with diplomatic meeting but I don't think it will hold
there's a possible scam with diplomatic meeting but I don't think it will hold
are there any other sources for doha besides barak ravid
are there any other sources for doha besides barak ravid
poly should just give up on PR they are bad at it
poly should just give up on PR they are bad at it
there was no issue with that one
there was no issue with that one
why don't they just repeat the ceasefire lasts until market
why don't they just repeat the ceasefire lasts until market
It's not a clear no but it's even less clear of a yes imo
It's not a clear no but it's even less clear of a yes imo
I don't know hebew to contest that but it will depend on whether that is a specific term of art that can unambiguously be interpreted as shuttle diplomacy
I don't know hebew to contest that but it will depend on whether that is a specific term of art that can unambiguously be interpreted as shuttle diplomacy
hmm ok
hmm ok
y? it says separate talks
y? it says separate talks
this one
this one
yes barack ravid in his tweet clarified that they were separate meetings
yes barack ravid in his tweet clarified that they were separate meetings
that's not what it says
that's not what it says
where do you see that all 3 parties are in doha?
where do you see that all 3 parties are in doha?
it's very simple. if the meeting is indirect, then it must be in person to qualify
it's very simple. if the meeting is indirect, then it must be in person to qualify
this is both indirect and not in person
this is both indirect and not in person
dude are you esl? > The meeting must be in-person (including indirect in-person meetings) this says: in person: YES, indirect in person: YES, not in person: NO, indirect not in person: NO
dude are you esl? > The meeting must be in-person (including indirect in-person meetings) this says: in person: YES, indirect in person: YES, not in person: NO, indirect not in person: NO
imcrine you guys made this dump to 98.5
imcrine you guys made this dump to 98.5
cause it says. Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count.
cause it says. Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle_diplomacy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle_diplomacy
The original shuttle diplomacy example is two parties in the same building and shuttling messages between them
The original shuttle diplomacy example is two parties in the same building and shuttling messages between them
> Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count. I mean, this clearly kills it. No way anyone went to Tehran
> Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count. I mean, this clearly kills it. No way anyone went to Tehran