PolymarketI agree Scout
I agree Scout
nsc参与话题 15消息总数 765
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 765 条，显示第 551-600 条<:BASED:1389796938513387724>
<:BASED:1389796938513387724>
as per Polymarket
as per Polymarket
not in May
not in May
The trick is to be positive and claim @KingFisher | 💀$-255,822 's losses
The trick is to be positive and claim @KingFisher | 💀$-255,822 's losses
whos negative? Arman is I think
whos negative? Arman is I think
almost everyone here has +ve PnL if you didnt know imcrine
almost everyone here has +ve PnL if you didnt know imcrine
Jessica moving into my basement... We will clarify together
Jessica moving into my basement... We will clarify together
brother do you know what happens when you withdraw cash to CEX?
brother do you know what happens when you withdraw cash to CEX?
it depends.. If your primary income is 30k and poly is 150k obviously they'd tax poly
it depends.. If your primary income is 30k and poly is 150k obviously they'd tax poly
Jessica throwing some philosophical questions its funny
Jessica throwing some philosophical questions its funny
I will become rich because everyone else is retarded
I will become rich because everyone else is retarded
Well you need some other primary income, otherwise they'd consider it your job and tax it fully
Well you need some other primary income, otherwise they'd consider it your job and tax it fully
<@634236418310275072> btw Canadian dont pay tax on Polymarket winnings, as it is considered gambling. Gambling winnings are tax free here
<@634236418310275072> btw Canadian dont pay tax on Polymarket winnings, as it is considered gambling. Gambling winnings are tax free here
coming for my gains
coming for my gains
vro...
vro...
sonion
sonion
Bosa-tard
Bosa-tard
dictionary calls it that way I think
dictionary calls it that way I think
that counted as an insult?
that counted as an insult?
after my recent clarifuck streak I have no standing
after my recent clarifuck streak I have no standing
maybe its true!
maybe its true!
I dont think the word itself or calling someone litiguous is necessarily insulting
I dont think the word itself or calling someone litiguous is necessarily insulting
so I concede
so I concede
But the point of market having a low bar is also correct
But the point of market having a low bar is also correct
well whama is bosaurum insider, so I am not gonna bet against it
well whama is bosaurum insider, so I am not gonna bet against it
no bro strategy insiders printed. They knew the rules, retail got fuckedddd
no bro strategy insiders printed. They knew the rules, retail got fuckedddd
new insult market for May 31
new insult market for May 31
same
same
I treat litiguous as a neutral word personally
I treat litiguous as a neutral word personally
idk how high the bar is though fr fr
idk how high the bar is though fr fr
they clarified merz to No when he talked shit about germany
they clarified merz to No when he talked shit about germany
for making so many disputes
for making so many disputes
when I say Thonker is litiguous, I'm complimenting him
when I say Thonker is litiguous, I'm complimenting him
<@941405798096076880> do you? If so, lets clarify please
<@941405798096076880> do you? If so, lets clarify please
why is price 85c then
why is price 85c then
<@1370016115933188207> too please
<@1370016115933188207> too please
if litiguous is an insult?
if litiguous is an insult?
<@1442598779491451153> can you clarify
<@1442598779491451153> can you clarify
proceeds to ignore it and start a shitshow
proceeds to ignore it and start a shitshow
Was Information from MSTR complete at June 1st 12 AM for May's period?
Was Information from MSTR complete at June 1st 12 AM for May's period?
whats wrong with it?
whats wrong with it?
Given its not an announcement market, the fair resolution is Yes. But N has precedent behind it
Given its not an announcement market, the fair resolution is Yes. But N has precedent behind it
yen4u yen4me yen4everyone
yen4u yen4me yen4everyone
<:chad:1389812072254013471>
<:chad:1389812072254013471>
bro has 200k in N and is helping Y arguments
bro has 200k in N and is helping Y arguments
Why is Dropper arguing against his N bags <:ICANT:1389796966967414918> he always does this I feel
Why is Dropper arguing against his N bags <:ICANT:1389796966967414918> he always does this I feel
poly clarifies against jessica every time
poly clarifies against jessica every time
I want jessica clarif, so I can fade it
I want jessica clarif, so I can fade it
I havent seen you in disputed markets in forever
I havent seen you in disputed markets in forever