秋田预测市场 · Discord 审计

市场创建从D+2缩短为D+1引发用户体验下降

2026-06-06 · Polymarket · 11 条相关讨论

weatherguy2025 2026-06-05 20:34:02

man, i dont understand how this is supposed to improve long term liquidity. my average daily deployed capital is probably a third......make this make sense

man, i dont understand how this is supposed to improve long term liquidity. my average daily deployed capital is probably a third......make this make sense

Curious18638 2026-06-05 21:07:37

guys this d0/d1 such a shitshiw

guys this d0/d1 such a shitshiw

Curious18638 2026-06-05 21:07:52

in asia, seoul and wellington are now closed already for 06-June...

in asia, seoul and wellington are now closed already for 06-June...

Curious18638 2026-06-05 21:15:11

Does someone has a contact within Polymarket to tell them?

Does someone has a contact within Polymarket to tell them?

Curious18638 2026-06-05 21:15:34

1/ they should bring back the d2 2/ if they dont, at least be mindful of Asian users

1/ they should bring back the d2 2/ if they dont, at least be mindful of Asian users

Curious18638 2026-06-05 21:22:47

As an example, in NYC it is 9am on 05-June, but for people in Asia, the 06-June Seoul market is already over (25 or below), and wellington will be completed in a few hours :/ <@1402701322775695391> <@1361217824776786031>

As an example, in NYC it is 9am on 05-June, but for people in Asia, the 06-June Seoul market is already over (25 or below), and wellington will be completed in a few hours :/ <@1402701322775695391> <@1361217824776786031>

EEEHHH 2026-06-05 22:50:15

just roll it back to D+2 nyc midnight open and stop making adjustments

just roll it back to D+2 nyc midnight open and stop making adjustments

Capital G (aka Foiling Cat) 2026-06-06 13:09:16

Removing D+2 is right up there as one of Polymarket’s stupidest decisions.

Removing D+2 is right up there as one of Polymarket’s stupidest decisions.

lonestar79 2026-06-06 16:06:48

PM team, please bring back D+2

PM team, please bring back D+2

janov pelorat 2026-06-06 16:31:10

<@1361217824776786031> not sure why the strike fix and the shorter deployment got bundled together — those feel like two separate levers if strikes are actually better now, great. but cutting T-2 just removes the only window where these markets are actually tradeable imo T-3→T-2 is when forecast views still move, you can work limits, and books have time to build before everyone piles in on T-1. T-1-only is basically the repricing rush — tighter spreads, less time to scale, harder to get out clean if you're wrong throwing rewards at T-1 might bump volume short term but it doesn't replace losing a full day of entry. feels like optimizing for activity over actual liquidity/edge imo if the new data source is really that much better, keep T-2 (or bring T-3 back) and let the quality show up in tighter markets + better fills. cutting lead time fixes a different problem

<@1361217824776786031> not sure why the strike fix and the shorter deployment got bundled together — those feel like two separate levers if strikes are actually better now, great. but cutting T-2 just removes the only window where these markets are actually tradeable imo T-3→T-2 is when forecast views still move, you can work limits, and books have time to build before everyone piles in on T-1. T-1-only is basically the repricing rush — tighter spreads, less time to scale, harder to get out clean if you're wrong throwing rewards at T-1 might bump volume short term but it doesn't replace losing a full day of entry. feels like optimizing for activity over actual liquidity/edge imo if the new data source is really that much better, keep T-2 (or bring T-3 back) and let the quality show up in tighter markets + better fills. cutting lead time fixes a different problem