<@941405798096076880> <@1400131860612513894> <@1272383282687905939>
A clarification on the mythos market in the event the model is not called mythos but “is the model referenced in the leak” would be nice.
It’s not really clear what this means? If it’s painted as a “mythos class model” but named something else will this count? Just seems like there is a lot of ambiguity here as how would we know if same model in the leak, etc.
<@941405798096076880> <@1400131860612513894> <@1272383282687905939>
A clarification on the mythos market in the event the model is not called mythos but “is the model referenced in the leak” would be nice.
It’s not really clear what this means? If it’s painted as a “mythos class model” but named something else will this count? Just seems like there is a lot of ambiguity here as how would we know if same model in the leak, etc.
The recent comms from Anthropic seem to imply that a scenario like this is plausible.
The recent comms from Anthropic seem to imply that a scenario like this is plausible.
Model is portrayed as “mythos class” or something similar but is not literally called Mythos but maybe something new.
Model is portrayed as “mythos class” or something similar but is not literally called Mythos but maybe something new.
Can you send pm link
Can you send pm link
its the mythos market
its the mythos market
there's only one
there's only one
https://polymarket.com/event/claude-mythos-released-by
https://polymarket.com/event/claude-mythos-released-by
here it is
here it is
Thanks king
Thanks king
Just the tldr is if they say "mythos class model" but call it something else does that count as being the thing referenced in the leak?
Just the tldr is if they say "mythos class model" but call it something else does that count as being the thing referenced in the leak?