该用户的聊天记录定位。
https://polymarket.com/event/will-100t-make-a-roster-change-before-august-20260610174121084 Already done for 4 days but no resolution yet, resolve please
https://polymarket.com/event/will-100t-make-a-roster-change-before-august-20260610174121084 Already done for 4 days but no resolution yet, resolve please
i would do so but I want to sleep as well hahah
i would do so but I want to sleep as well hahah
in the first case, it would not be under but 50/50 but they did not FF Map 2 and Map 3 at the same time, first they FF Map 2 and then Map 3 when they had time to connect and still play
in the first case, it would not be under but 50/50 but they did not FF Map 2 and Map 3 at the same time, first they FF Map 2 and then Map 3 when they had time to connect and still play
but the match was completed as we discussed earlier, this is only if it is not completed
but the match was completed as we discussed earlier, this is only if it is not completed
so if the match is completed, the maps forfeited count
so if the match is completed, the maps forfeited count
"Maps won by forfeit, disqualification, walkover, or default are counted towards the total, provided that the match is completed." this is written in the rules
"Maps won by forfeit, disqualification, walkover, or default are counted towards the total, provided that the match is completed." this is written in the rules
clutchain forfeited map 2 individually, had time to connect to map 3, tried but failed to do so = map 3 is the clinching map as the match could have continued on the 3rd map if they readied up as 5 and as per rules, if the clinching map is forfeited, the match counts as completed
clutchain forfeited map 2 individually, had time to connect to map 3, tried but failed to do so = map 3 is the clinching map as the match could have continued on the 3rd map if they readied up as 5 and as per rules, if the clinching map is forfeited, the match counts as completed
yes, they did not start because they cannot start 4v5, so they had to forfeit each map individually
yes, they did not start because they cannot start 4v5, so they had to forfeit each map individually
if someone wants the source: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2791825893?t=1h37m35s - 2nd map Inferno https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2791825893?t=1h48m50s - 3rd map Nuke https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2791825893?t=1h44m15s - at this point you can see that Map 2 (Inferno) is no longer set on the server - it is forfeited, and 8 minute countdown to connect to the server, ready up, and start the 3rd map is on.
if someone wants the source: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2791825893?t=1h37m35s - 2nd map Inferno https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2791825893?t=1h48m50s - 3rd map Nuke https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2791825893?t=1h44m15s - at this point you can see that Map 2 (Inferno) is no longer set on the server - it is forfeited, and 8 minute countdown to connect to the server, ready up, and start the 3rd map is on.
If they really decided to forfeit after Map 1, yes, then it makes sense at 50/50. But in reality, they tried to get as much time as possible to play the rest of the match, especially after winning the 1st map - so they forfeited Map 2 and then still had time to play Map 3.
If they really decided to forfeit after Map 1, yes, then it makes sense at 50/50. But in reality, they tried to get as much time as possible to play the rest of the match, especially after winning the 1st map - so they forfeited Map 2 and then still had time to play Map 3.
Therefore Map 3 is clinching map as Map 2 was forfeited individually
Therefore Map 3 is clinching map as Map 2 was forfeited individually
So they had to forfeit both maps, obviously, not at once. Especially when they won the first map.
So they had to forfeit both maps, obviously, not at once. Especially when they won the first map.
But per rules, they had to forfeit the map if they do not ready up in 10 minutes or so.
But per rules, they had to forfeit the map if they do not ready up in 10 minutes or so.
They do not want to forfeit, they wanted to waste as much time as possible, get as much time as possible to fix the issues.
They do not want to forfeit, they wanted to waste as much time as possible, get as much time as possible to fix the issues.
Yes, of course they tried, it would make no sense if they had not.
Yes, of course they tried, it would make no sense if they had not.
On the stream VOD you can clearly see that after Map 1, the players automatically were on server for Map 2 but did not ready up in time as 5. Then they had another like 10 minutes to connect on Map 3 but failed to do so as well.
On the stream VOD you can clearly see that after Map 1, the players automatically were on server for Map 2 but did not ready up in time as 5. Then they had another like 10 minutes to connect on Map 3 but failed to do so as well.
I mean it is the same situation that is what I mean
I mean it is the same situation that is what I mean
<@639555686208110612> Is this not the same situation as M1X vs dripmen that we have dealt with just a month before. I think this should resolve Over 2.5, XI +1.5. Clutchain had technical issues for one of the players - they forfeited Map 2 first and after that Map 3 as they failed to connect on Map 3 also.
<@639555686208110612> Is this not the same situation as M1X vs dripmen that we have dealt with just a month before. I think this should resolve Over 2.5, XI +1.5. Clutchain had technical issues for one of the players - they forfeited Map 2 first and after that Map 3 as they failed to connect on Map 3 also.
https://polymarket.com/esports/cs2/esea/cs2-xi-clutch-2026-06-08 Clutchain forfeit after Map 1 - Map 2 50/50, Total Over 2.5 100/0, XI +1.5 100/0
https://polymarket.com/esports/cs2/esea/cs2-xi-clutch-2026-06-08 Clutchain forfeit after Map 1 - Map 2 50/50, Total Over 2.5 100/0, XI +1.5 100/0
Polymarket