Bruh even worse is that USA x IRAN permanent end of war market
Bruh even worse is that USA x IRAN permanent end of war market
2026-06-17 · Polymarket · 1129 条相关讨论
Bruh even worse is that USA x IRAN permanent end of war market
Bruh even worse is that USA x IRAN permanent end of war market
This
This
Fucked
Fucked
A permanent peace deal most likely on 19 June but the market is closed and favor on YES
A permanent peace deal most likely on 19 June but the market is closed and favor on YES
I honestly think the MOU is not an agreement
I honestly think the MOU is not an agreement
<@707597210845446214> please look into this, it’s loud and clear on all platforms that this is a MOU For a permanent end not yet achieved and concluded as final agreement which will only be signed on 19th June
<@707597210845446214> please look into this, it’s loud and clear on all platforms that this is a MOU For a permanent end not yet achieved and concluded as final agreement which will only be signed on 19th June
<@1356604771208790198> need poly team attention on this matter
<@1356604771208790198> need poly team attention on this matter
I don't understand how yes is 99% literally: - memorandum of understanding - not permanent - not signed
I don't understand how yes is 99% literally: - memorandum of understanding - not permanent - not signed
Let’s bring this to review thread
Let’s bring this to review thread
<@1272383282687905939> <@1212792946341183578> <@378264721171939330> <@707597210845446214> <@1503480370484740297> can anyone from Polymarket team please give us clarification on US x Iran permanent peace deal market. how can this resolve in YES when not even one of rules was met.
<@1272383282687905939> <@1212792946341183578> <@378264721171939330> <@707597210845446214> <@1503480370484740297> can anyone from Polymarket team please give us clarification on US x Iran permanent peace deal market. how can this resolve in YES when not even one of rules was met.
There is no clear proof that permanent peace deal was done, NO one from US side said its permanent peace deal and no one know even what is signed How can anyone declare this as YES when no one from US side ever mentioned permanent peace deal, also does anyone knows what is in this MOU when still no one has seen a deal
There is no clear proof that permanent peace deal was done, NO one from US side said its permanent peace deal and no one know even what is signed How can anyone declare this as YES when no one from US side ever mentioned permanent peace deal, also does anyone knows what is in this MOU when still no one has seen a deal
Why tf have they not issued a clarification
Why tf have they not issued a clarification
It’s been so long
It’s been so long
I don’t get it
I don’t get it
as it seems polymarket is same scammers as UMA whales and they work together, there is 0 proof this was permanent peace deal, ZERO!! no one from US side ever mentioned it and in rules its clear that both side need to announce it
as it seems polymarket is same scammers as UMA whales and they work together, there is 0 proof this was permanent peace deal, ZERO!! no one from US side ever mentioned it and in rules its clear that both side need to announce it
Give up, bro. Both the U.S and Iran agreed to a peace deal. The market has resolved correctly.
Give up, bro. Both the U.S and Iran agreed to a peace deal. The market has resolved correctly.
give me one proof, i am sending you 1000$
give me one proof, i am sending you 1000$
Subject: Urgent Review Request: Potential Market Manipulation and Conflict of Interest in the US-Iran Peace Market ($345M Dispute)To the Polymarket Compliance and Governance Team,I am writing to formally request an urgent internal investigation into the ongoing dispute resolution for the "US x Iran Permanent Peace Deal" market. There is clear evidence of systemic unfairness and potential market manipulation that threatens the integrity of your platform.We urge the compliance team to investigate the following critical points:Whale Wallet Monopoly: On-chain data reveals that approximately 9 to 10 anonymous wallets control over 50% of the UMA token voting power. This extreme concentration allows a tiny group of individuals to dictate the "truth" regardless of objective geopolitical facts on the ground.Direct Conflict of Interest: There is a strong indication that these dominant UMA token holders also hold massive financial positions within the Polymarket betting pool itself. They are actively using their voting power to force a resolution (interpreting a temporary 60-day agreement as "permanent") solely to protect their own multi-million dollar wagers.Plutocratic Manipulation: The "1 Token = 1 Vote" structure, combined with UMA's slashing mechanism, is forcing smaller retail traders and honest voters to align with these whales out of fear of losing their assets. This weaponization of capital completely destroys the concept of an unbiased, decentralized oracle.Polymarket’s reputation as a reliable prediction market depends heavily on fair outcomes. If a small group of wealthy anonymous actors can legally manipulate the resolution process to steal funds from thousands of retail traders, it exposes a fatal vulnerability in your ecosystem.We respectfully demand that the Polymarket management team steps in, reviews the on-chain data for insider trading, and considers an emergency resolution override to protect market integrity.Sincerely,
Subject: Urgent Review Request: Potential Market Manipulation and Conflict of Interest in the US-Iran Peace Market ($345M Dispute)To the Polymarket Compliance and Governance Team,I am writing to formally request an urgent internal investigation into the ongoing dispute resolution for the "US x Iran Permanent Peace Deal" market. There is clear evidence of systemic unfairness and potential market manipulation that threatens the integrity of your platform.We urge the compliance team to investigate the following critical points:Whale Wallet Monopoly: On-chain data reveals that approximately 9 to 10 anonymous wallets control over 50% of the UMA token voting power. This extreme concentration allows a tiny group of individuals to dictate the "truth" regardless of objective geopolitical facts on the ground.Direct Conflict of Interest: There is a strong indication that these dominant UMA token holders also hold massive financial positions within the Polymarket betting pool itself. They are actively using their voting power to force a resolution (interpreting a temporary 60-day agreement as "permanent") solely to protect their own multi-million dollar wagers.Plutocratic Manipulation: The "1 Token = 1 Vote" structure, combined with UMA's slashing mechanism, is forcing smaller retail traders and honest voters to align with these whales out of fear of losing their assets. This weaponization of capital completely destroys the concept of an unbiased, decentralized oracle.Polymarket’s reputation as a reliable prediction market depends heavily on fair outcomes. If a small group of wealthy anonymous actors can legally manipulate the resolution process to steal funds from thousands of retail traders, it exposes a fatal vulnerability in your ecosystem.We respectfully demand that the Polymarket management team steps in, reviews the on-chain data for insider trading, and considers an emergency resolution override to protect market integrity.Sincerely,
<@1361217824776786031> are there any plans to changing UMA to a new oracle/resolution source that isn't so easily gamable?
<@1361217824776786031> are there any plans to changing UMA to a new oracle/resolution source that isn't so easily gamable?
Polymarket why is Iran permanent deal sitting at 100%. Trump just came out and confirmed it is not final and that he would go back to bombing??
Polymarket why is Iran permanent deal sitting at 100%. Trump just came out and confirmed it is not final and that he would go back to bombing??