Polymarketi will i just want to prove that YES is not correct as no one from US side announce permanent peace deal,simple as that
i will i just want to prove that YES is not correct as no one from US side announce permanent peace deal,simple as that
miokirapaic参与话题 1消息总数 18
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 18 条，显示第 1-18 条do you know how to read? again where did he said its permanent peace deal? he said deal is done and open of Hormuz, this dont mean its PERMANENT PEACE DEAL!
do you know how to read? again where did he said its permanent peace deal? he said deal is done and open of Hormuz, this dont mean its PERMANENT PEACE DEAL!
i said to <@1097894333128114176> or anyone else who can provide me with proof that anyone from US officialy said this is permanent peace deal i send him 1k but seems no one can take easy money even everyone is saying its YES,so how can something be yes when no one can prove it
i said to <@1097894333128114176> or anyone else who can provide me with proof that anyone from US officialy said this is permanent peace deal i send him 1k but seems no one can take easy money even everyone is saying its YES,so how can something be yes when no one can prove it
whole world can repost it but its only from one side not from both, rules are clear
whole world can repost it but its only from one side not from both, rules are clear
lol again its only one side
lol again its only one side
- Both the governments of the United States and Iran provide clear public confirmation that a qualifying agreement has been definitively established.- this is in poly rules i dont see it
- Both the governments of the United States and Iran provide clear public confirmation that a qualifying agreement has been definitively established.- this is in poly rules i dont see it
i ask all the time that someone send me proof from US side, you cant take one side and said its clear as one side can say one thing and another something else
i ask all the time that someone send me proof from US side, you cant take one side and said its clear as one side can say one thing and another something else
in rules its clear that both side need to announce it
in rules its clear that both side need to announce it
give me one from US side
give me one from US side
this is pakistani guy
this is pakistani guy
all say its yes and no one gives any proof
all say its yes and no one gives any proof
give me one proof from US side its permanent peace deal!
give me one proof from US side its permanent peace deal!
bring it on
bring it on
<@1097894333128114176> cmon man give me one proof where anyone from US side said this is permanent peace deal, no one even know what they signed as it will be revealed after 19.6
<@1097894333128114176> cmon man give me one proof where anyone from US side said this is permanent peace deal, no one even know what they signed as it will be revealed after 19.6
give me one proof, i am sending you 1000$
give me one proof, i am sending you 1000$
as it seems polymarket is same scammers as UMA whales and they work together, there is 0 proof this was permanent peace deal, ZERO!! no one from US side ever mentioned it and in rules its clear that both side need to announce it
as it seems polymarket is same scammers as UMA whales and they work together, there is 0 proof this was permanent peace deal, ZERO!! no one from US side ever mentioned it and in rules its clear that both side need to announce it
There is no clear proof that permanent peace deal was done, NO one from US side said its permanent peace deal and no one know even what is signed How can anyone declare this as YES when no one from US side ever mentioned permanent peace deal, also does anyone knows what is in this MOU when still no one has seen a deal
There is no clear proof that permanent peace deal was done, NO one from US side said its permanent peace deal and no one know even what is signed How can anyone declare this as YES when no one from US side ever mentioned permanent peace deal, also does anyone knows what is in this MOU when still no one has seen a deal
<@1272383282687905939> <@1212792946341183578> <@378264721171939330> <@707597210845446214> <@1503480370484740297> can anyone from Polymarket team please give us clarification on US x Iran permanent peace deal market. how can this resolve in YES when not even one of rules was met.
<@1272383282687905939> <@1212792946341183578> <@378264721171939330> <@707597210845446214> <@1503480370484740297> can anyone from Polymarket team please give us clarification on US x Iran permanent peace deal market. how can this resolve in YES when not even one of rules was met.