Why is this approved like that if today Iran and the US completely broke off diplomatic negotiations and never signed anything, I lost money because of this
Why is this approved like that if today Iran and the US completely broke off diplomatic negotiations and never signed anything, I lost money because of this
The title clearly states all the conditions, namely the Nuclear Agreement between the US and Iran by June 30?
no deal happened, no one signed anything, but my money burned and no one will give it back to me))))
The title clearly states all the conditions, namely the Nuclear Agreement between the US and Iran by June 30?
no deal happened, no one signed anything, but my money burned and no one will give it back to me))))
where is even the jun 12 option on the iran usa permanent peace deal market? you guys really scamming this shamelessly? june 7 and 15 is there, where is the 12th? you just erased like it never happened?
where is even the jun 12 option on the iran usa permanent peace deal market? you guys really scamming this shamelessly? june 7 and 15 is there, where is the 12th? you just erased like it never happened?
where is even the jun 12 option on the iran usa permanent peace deal market? you guys really scamming this shamelessly? june 7 and 15 is there, where is the 12th? you just erased like it never happened?
where is even the jun 12 option on the iran usa permanent peace deal market? you guys really scamming this shamelessly? june 7 and 15 is there, where is the 12th? you just erased like it never happened?
whats up with this <@1356604771208790198>
whats up with this <@1356604771208790198>
This all concerns two fundamentally similar markets with different outcomes. On June 13, 2026 — "US announces new agreement with Iran/ceasefire extension..." — and there are many details here. It was disputed twice. During the debates, one of the UMA holders openly called for voting for P4. As a result, the vote was tanked. And there is a second market — also June 13, 2026 — "US announces the place or date of the signing of the agreement between the US and Iran..." — but here the volume was small, it didn't attract the whales' interest, and everything was obvious anyway. In both cases, we're talking about the same agreement. If you check the logs, in the first case, it was specifically the whales' wallets — who had a vested interest — that blocked the "Yes" outcome. In the end, tired of spending resources on a clearly manipulated market, the "Yes" side did not file an appeal. And without a vote, the opponents won. So I wouldn't be surprised if the whales could organize the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Links to the events are attached
This all concerns two fundamentally similar markets with different outcomes. On June 13, 2026 — "US announces new agreement with Iran/ceasefire extension..." — and there are many details here. It was disputed twice. During the debates, one of the UMA holders openly called for voting for P4. As a result, the vote was tanked. And there is a second market — also June 13, 2026 — "US announces the place or date of the signing of the agreement between the US and Iran..." — but here the volume was small, it didn't attract the whales' interest, and everything was obvious anyway. In both cases, we're talking about the same agreement. If you check the logs, in the first case, it was specifically the whales' wallets — who had a vested interest — that blocked the "Yes" outcome. In the end, tired of spending resources on a clearly manipulated market, the "Yes" side did not file an appeal. And without a vote, the opponents won. So I wouldn't be surprised if the whales could organize the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Links to the events are attached