该用户的聊天记录定位。
I have a question. Do you check the data before confirming the market? Or if the crowd wants 'yes' and no one disputes it, then let it be 'yes
I have a question. Do you check the data before confirming the market? Or if the crowd wants 'yes' and no one disputes it, then let it be 'yes
As always, you can't do anything — you don't know anything!
As always, you can't do anything — you don't know anything!
According to the market rules, it is clearly stated: “distinct cities” — separate cities, not neighborhoods, districts, or parts of agglomerations. The San Francisco Bay Area is officially described by Waymo as a single service region. Just like “Los Angeles County”, such areas must be counted as one city, not split. Therefore, the correct count is exactly 10 cities.
According to the market rules, it is clearly stated: “distinct cities” — separate cities, not neighborhoods, districts, or parts of agglomerations. The San Francisco Bay Area is officially described by Waymo as a single service region. Just like “Los Angeles County”, such areas must be counted as one city, not split. Therefore, the correct count is exactly 10 cities.
https://polymarket.com/ru/event/how-many-cities-will-waymo-operate-in-by-june-30-2026/will-waymo-operate-in-11-cities-on-june-30-2026According to the official Waymo website, as of June 30, 2026, the public ride-hailing service is available in exactly 10 cities. Why is the market currently being decided between 8 and 11? On what basis is 11 being considered, if the official source clearly shows 10?
https://polymarket.com/ru/event/how-many-cities-will-waymo-operate-in-by-june-30-2026/will-waymo-operate-in-11-cities-on-june-30-2026According to the official Waymo website, as of June 30, 2026, the public ride-hailing service is available in exactly 10 cities. Why is the market currently being decided between 8 and 11? On what basis is 11 being considered, if the official source clearly shows 10?
There are official data and clear market rules! How are you twisting everything like this?
There are official data and clear market rules! How are you twisting everything like this?
On Waymo’s official website in the “Serving Riders In” section, exactly 10 cities/regions are listed with active service: Atlanta, Austin, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, Nashville, Orlando, Phoenix, San Antonio, and the San Francisco Bay Area (counted as one region per market rules). All other cities shown on the site (Sacramento, Portland, Seattle, etc.) are marked as “coming soon” or in testing phase and do not offer public ride-hailing service as of June 30. According to the market rules, only publicly available services count. Waymo itself announced and confirmed operations in these 10 cities. There was no official announcement of an 11th fully public launch before the June 30 deadline. Counting the San Francisco Bay Area as two separate cities would violate the market rule: “If Waymo describes a broader region (e.g., “San Francisco Bay Area”) as a single service area, it will count as one city/region.”https://polymarket.com/ru/event/how-many-cities-will-waymo-operate-in-by-june-30-2026/will-waymo-operate-in-11-cities-on-june-30-2026
On Waymo’s official website in the “Serving Riders In” section, exactly 10 cities/regions are listed with active service: Atlanta, Austin, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, Nashville, Orlando, Phoenix, San Antonio, and the San Francisco Bay Area (counted as one region per market rules). All other cities shown on the site (Sacramento, Portland, Seattle, etc.) are marked as “coming soon” or in testing phase and do not offer public ride-hailing service as of June 30. According to the market rules, only publicly available services count. Waymo itself announced and confirmed operations in these 10 cities. There was no official announcement of an 11th fully public launch before the June 30 deadline. Counting the San Francisco Bay Area as two separate cities would violate the market rule: “If Waymo describes a broader region (e.g., “San Francisco Bay Area”) as a single service area, it will count as one city/region.”https://polymarket.com/ru/event/how-many-cities-will-waymo-operate-in-by-june-30-2026/will-waymo-operate-in-11-cities-on-june-30-2026
I sent a deposit to the address, but the funds have not been credited?
I sent a deposit to the address, but the funds have not been credited?
Understand what??? That you made up a match out of thin air, drew up a score, and then amended the rules afterward?
Understand what??? That you made up a match out of thin air, drew up a score, and then amended the rules afterward?
So fix your skills issue and give me my money back!
So fix your skills issue and give me my money back!
The wording 'match cancelled' applies to matches that were scheduled but for some reason did not take place! This match was not scheduled by any football federation — the match is a fabrication of the platform, and the wording 'match cancelled' simply does not apply here. https://polymarket.com/ru/sports/trsk/trsk-fen-sam-2026-06-01 0xdeFA1d28c56b30a053e870F89754f5e0AbAcd902
The wording 'match cancelled' applies to matches that were scheduled but for some reason did not take place! This match was not scheduled by any football federation — the match is a fabrication of the platform, and the wording 'match cancelled' simply does not apply here. https://polymarket.com/ru/sports/trsk/trsk-fen-sam-2026-06-01 0xdeFA1d28c56b30a053e870F89754f5e0AbAcd902
Summary of the Facts: I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026. No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform. The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication. On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date— your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place." At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches. My Legal and Moral Position: The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with. This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation. You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds. Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility. My Demand:
Summary of the Facts: I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026. No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform. The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication. On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date— your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place." At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches. My Legal and Moral Position: The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with. This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation. You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds. Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility. My Demand:
0xdeFA1d28c56b30a053e870F89754f5e0AbAcd902
0xdeFA1d28c56b30a053e870F89754f5e0AbAcd902
https://polymarket.com/ru/sports/trsk/trsk-fen-sam-2026-06-01
https://polymarket.com/ru/sports/trsk/trsk-fen-sam-2026-06-01
The wording 'match cancelled' applies to matches that were scheduled but for some reason did not take place! This match was not scheduled by any football federation — the match is a fabrication of the platform, and the wording 'match cancelled' simply does not apply here.
The wording 'match cancelled' applies to matches that were scheduled but for some reason did not take place! This match was not scheduled by any football federation — the match is a fabrication of the platform, and the wording 'match cancelled' simply does not apply here.
Summary of the Facts: I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026. No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform. The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication. On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date— your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place." At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches. My Legal and Moral Position: The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with. This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation. You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds. Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility. My Demand: I formally demand the full and immediate refund of all funds wagered on this fictitious match. You made a mistake — you invented an event that never existed — and you must compensate for it. If you fail to return my money, I will consider this a deliberate act of fraud and will take all necessary measures, including filing complaints with relevant regulatory authorities and making this matter public.
Summary of the Facts: I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026. No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform. The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication. On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date— your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place." At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches. My Legal and Moral Position: The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with. This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation. You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds. Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility. My Demand: I formally demand the full and immediate refund of all funds wagered on this fictitious match. You made a mistake — you invented an event that never existed — and you must compensate for it. If you fail to return my money, I will consider this a deliberate act of fraud and will take all necessary measures, including filing complaints with relevant regulatory authorities and making this matter public.
And it has already been three weeks! I ask specific questions, and they keep running away!
And it has already been three weeks! I ask specific questions, and they keep running away!
I have no desire to pay for their hallucinations! The platform is responsible for the accuracy of the market. And the fact that they published deliberately false information and then try to cover it up in a very brazen manner does not relieve them of responsibility.
I have no desire to pay for their hallucinations! The platform is responsible for the accuracy of the market. And the fact that they published deliberately false information and then try to cover it up in a very brazen manner does not relieve them of responsibility.
"The outcome 'the event did not take place' is an answer for a match that was postponed or did not occur due to force majeure — but in no way for an event that was never scheduled to happen in the first place.
"The outcome 'the event did not take place' is an answer for a match that was postponed or did not occur due to force majeure — but in no way for an event that was never scheduled to happen in the first place.
The addition was released on June 2 — not on June 1 and not on May 31! The fact that you added it afterward does not relieve you of responsibility for holding a match that should never have taken place at all.
The addition was released on June 2 — not on June 1 and not on May 31! The fact that you added it afterward does not relieve you of responsibility for holding a match that should never have taken place at all.
https://polymarket.com/ru/sports/trsk/trsk-fen-sam-2026-06-01
https://polymarket.com/ru/sports/trsk/trsk-fen-sam-2026-06-01
Summary of the Facts: I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026. No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform. The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication. On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date, and after May 31 — your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place." At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches. My Legal and Moral Position: The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with. This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation. You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds. Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility. The rules apply to matches that were postponed or cancelled — but the wording "the match did not take place" in this case is fraudulent, because the market was opened due to your hallucinations. My Demand: I formally demand the full and immediate refund of all funds wagered on this fictitious match. You made a mistake — you invented an event that never existed — and you must compensate for it. If you fail to return my money, I will consider this a deliberate act of fraud and will take all necessary measures, including filing complaints with relevant regulatory authorities and making this matter public.
Summary of the Facts: I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026. No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform. The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication. On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date, and after May 31 — your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place." At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches. My Legal and Moral Position: The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with. This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation. You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds. Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility. The rules apply to matches that were postponed or cancelled — but the wording "the match did not take place" in this case is fraudulent, because the market was opened due to your hallucinations. My Demand: I formally demand the full and immediate refund of all funds wagered on this fictitious match. You made a mistake — you invented an event that never existed — and you must compensate for it. If you fail to return my money, I will consider this a deliberate act of fraud and will take all necessary measures, including filing complaints with relevant regulatory authorities and making this matter public.
Summary of the Facts: I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026. No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform. The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication. On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date, and after May 31 — your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place." At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches. My Legal and Moral Position: The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with. This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation. You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds. Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility. The rules apply to matches that were postponed or cancelled — but the wording "the match did not take place" in this case is fraudulent, because the market was opened due to your hallucinations. My Demand: I formally demand the full and immediate refund of all funds wagered on this fictitious match. You made a mistake — you invented an event that never existed — and you must compensate for it. If you fail to return my money, I will consider this a deliberate act of fraud and will take all necessary measures, including filing complaints with relevant regulatory authorities and making this matter public.
Summary of the Facts: I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026. No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform. The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication. On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date, and after May 31 — your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place." At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches. My Legal and Moral Position: The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with. This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation. You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds. Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility. The rules apply to matches that were postponed or cancelled — but the wording "the match did not take place" in this case is fraudulent, because the market was opened due to your hallucinations. My Demand: I formally demand the full and immediate refund of all funds wagered on this fictitious match. You made a mistake — you invented an event that never existed — and you must compensate for it. If you fail to return my money, I will consider this a deliberate act of fraud and will take all necessary measures, including filing complaints with relevant regulatory authorities and making this matter public.
Interesting offer. How will it affect the resolution of my issue? I'll answer that myself — not at all. I've already sent all the evidence to tech support, but unfortunately, they can't do anything. Absolutely nothing.
Interesting offer. How will it affect the resolution of my issue? I'll answer that myself — not at all. I've already sent all the evidence to tech support, but unfortunately, they can't do anything. Absolutely nothing.
First of all — who are you? And how exactly do you plan to help? Are you going to apologize and that's it?
First of all — who are you? And how exactly do you plan to help? Are you going to apologize and that's it?
I can — whether it's about football matches or geopolitics. I sent everything to technical support. I've been waiting for two weeks since my first request. I received only one email — they apologized and said they don't handle this issue. Who does? Where does it get resolved? They never answered that.
I can — whether it's about football matches or geopolitics. I sent everything to technical support. I've been waiting for two weeks since my first request. I received only one email — they apologized and said they don't handle this issue. Who does? Where does it get resolved? They never answered that.
Just be honest and say there is no exact date, and there never will be, because no one is going to deal with this!
Just be honest and say there is no exact date, and there never will be, because no one is going to deal with this!
I'm talking to you about football and result manipulation! I have sent you this problem 100 times, and 100 times you have told me that you are not the one solving it. And in the end, it turns out that no one is solving it at all.
I'm talking to you about football and result manipulation! I have sent you this problem 100 times, and 100 times you have told me that you are not the one solving it. And in the end, it turns out that no one is solving it at all.
Tell the guys how you make up football matches yourselves and post them. You draw up the scores yourselves. And then you apologize with an innocent look, but you don't return the money!
Tell the guys how you make up football matches yourselves and post them. You draw up the scores yourselves. And then you apologize with an innocent look, but you don't return the money!
That's exactly what it means! Already spent 24 hours in a ban. I was asking inconvenient questions!
That's exactly what it means! Already spent 24 hours in a ban. I was asking inconvenient questions!
Friends, neither here nor in Polymarket's other support channels will anyone help you. They'll only help you top up your account — nothing more. Take care of yourselves and your money.
Friends, neither here nor in Polymarket's other support channels will anyone help you. They'll only help you top up your account — nothing more. Take care of yourselves and your money.
I told the truth, didn't I? Or are you going to ban me again?
I told the truth, didn't I? Or are you going to ban me again?
These are just more scammers. Some are here, others are out there. Neither side will actually help you — they only want your money. They'll help you top up your account. Nothing more.
These are just more scammers. Some are here, others are out there. Neither side will actually help you — they only want your money. They'll help you top up your account. Nothing more.
This all concerns two fundamentally similar markets with different outcomes. On June 13, 2026 — "US announces new agreement with Iran/ceasefire extension..." — and there are many details here. It was disputed twice. During the debates, one of the UMA holders openly called for voting for P4. As a result, the vote was tanked. And there is a second market — also June 13, 2026 — "US announces the place or date of the signing of the agreement between the US and Iran..." — but here the volume was small, it didn't attract the whales' interest, and everything was obvious anyway. In both cases, we're talking about the same agreement. If you check the logs, in the first case, it was specifically the whales' wallets — who had a vested interest — that blocked the "Yes" outcome. In the end, tired of spending resources on a clearly manipulated market, the "Yes" side did not file an appeal. And without a vote, the opponents won. So I wouldn't be surprised if the whales could organize the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Links to the events are attached
This all concerns two fundamentally similar markets with different outcomes. On June 13, 2026 — "US announces new agreement with Iran/ceasefire extension..." — and there are many details here. It was disputed twice. During the debates, one of the UMA holders openly called for voting for P4. As a result, the vote was tanked. And there is a second market — also June 13, 2026 — "US announces the place or date of the signing of the agreement between the US and Iran..." — but here the volume was small, it didn't attract the whales' interest, and everything was obvious anyway. In both cases, we're talking about the same agreement. If you check the logs, in the first case, it was specifically the whales' wallets — who had a vested interest — that blocked the "Yes" outcome. In the end, tired of spending resources on a clearly manipulated market, the "Yes" side did not file an appeal. And without a vote, the opponents won. So I wouldn't be surprised if the whales could organize the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Links to the events are attached
Did you send my complaint?
Did you send my complaint?
Did your colleague forward my complaint? Five days have passed — neither you, nor support, nor email are responding!
Did your colleague forward my complaint? Five days have passed — neither you, nor support, nor email are responding!
All good! You've become yet another victim of these scammers. They'll write to you saying they'll solve the problem — but they don't solve any financial issues except for getting you to top up your account. Scammers from outside will flood your DMs, and you'll just end up forgetting about your problem altogether.
All good! You've become yet another victim of these scammers. They'll write to you saying they'll solve the problem — but they don't solve any financial issues except for getting you to top up your account. Scammers from outside will flood your DMs, and you'll just end up forgetting about your problem altogether.
Did you forward my complaint? I sent the materials to you privately.
Did you forward my complaint? I sent the materials to you privately.
I sent it to you privately. Please review it and forward it to the competent parties.
I sent it to you privately. Please review it and forward it to the competent parties.
I'll send you all the materials privately. Please review them.
I'll send you all the materials privately. Please review them.
no
no
Yes or no?
Yes or no?
There is evidence of market manipulation! The events are identical — yet the outcomes are different.
There is evidence of market manipulation! The events are identical — yet the outcomes are different.
Will you accept the complaint? And will you be able to forward it up the chain?
Will you accept the complaint? And will you be able to forward it up the chain?
I want to congratulate everyone on yet another high-profile scam by the Polymarket whales! The market for June 13, 2026 (https://polymarket.com/ru/event/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by-june-13?locale=event&category=us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by&slug=us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by-june-13) which once again proves that if the whales decide to arrange the second coming of Christ, they could easily pull it off through the Polymarket platform.
I want to congratulate everyone on yet another high-profile scam by the Polymarket whales! The market for June 13, 2026 (https://polymarket.com/ru/event/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by-june-13?locale=event&category=us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by&slug=us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by-june-13) which once again proves that if the whales decide to arrange the second coming of Christ, they could easily pull it off through the Polymarket platform.
I want to congratulate everyone on yet another high-profile scam by the Polymarket whales! The market for June 13, 2026 (https://polymarket.com/ru/event/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by-june-13?locale=event&category=us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by&slug=us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by-june-13) which once again proves that if the whales decide to arrange the second coming of Christ, they could easily pull it off through the Polymarket platform.
I want to congratulate everyone on yet another high-profile scam by the Polymarket whales! The market for June 13, 2026 (https://polymarket.com/ru/event/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by-june-13?locale=event&category=us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by&slug=us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by-june-13) which once again proves that if the whales decide to arrange the second coming of Christ, they could easily pull it off through the Polymarket platform.
How do you manage to scam so brilliantly?https://polymarket.com/ru/event/us-announces-location-or-date-of-us-x-iran-deal-signing-byptptpt-20260611223337443 https://polymarket.com/ru/event/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by-june-13?locale=event&category=us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by&slug=us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by-june-13 And right now there's a vote where the 'yes' option is already losing in advance.
How do you manage to scam so brilliantly?https://polymarket.com/ru/event/us-announces-location-or-date-of-us-x-iran-deal-signing-byptptpt-20260611223337443 https://polymarket.com/ru/event/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by/us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by-june-13?locale=event&category=us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by&slug=us-announces-new-iran-agreementceasefire-extension-by-june-13 And right now there's a vote where the 'yes' option is already losing in advance.
Two days have passed, and the issue still hasn't been resolved.
Two days have passed, and the issue still hasn't been resolved.
Two days have passed, and the issue still hasn't been resolved.
Two days have passed, and the issue still hasn't been resolved.
I see that it's 1-0! And on your platform, it also says 1-0!
I see that it's 1-0! And on your platform, it also says 1-0!
0xB4261378733294ea83BFe6e8B46006984A5AF8eA Figure it out! Or find someone who can figure it out.
0xB4261378733294ea83BFe6e8B46006984A5AF8eA Figure it out! Or find someone who can figure it out.
Polymarket