Summary of the Facts:
I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026.
No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform.
The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication.
On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date, and after May 31 — your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place."
At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches.
My Legal and Moral Position:
The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with.
This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation.
You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds.
Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility.
The rules apply to matches that were postponed or cancelled — but the wording "the match did not take place" in this case is fraudulent, because the market was opened due to your hallucinations.
My Demand:
I formally demand the full and immediate refund of all funds wagered on this fictitious match. You made a mistake — you invented an event that never existed — and you must compensate for it.
If you fail to return my money, I will consider this a deliberate act of fraud and will take all necessary measures, including filing complaints with relevant regulatory authorities and making this matter public.
Summary of the Facts:
I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026.
No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform.
The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication.
On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date, and after May 31 — your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place."
At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches.
My Legal and Moral Position:
The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with.
This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation.
You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds.
Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility.
The rules apply to matches that were postponed or cancelled — but the wording "the match did not take place" in this case is fraudulent, because the market was opened due to your hallucinations.
My Demand:
I formally demand the full and immediate refund of all funds wagered on this fictitious match. You made a mistake — you invented an event that never existed — and you must compensate for it.
If you fail to return my money, I will consider this a deliberate act of fraud and will take all necessary measures, including filing complaints with relevant regulatory authorities and making this matter public.
Summary of the Facts:
I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026.
No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform.
The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication.
On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date, and after May 31 — your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place."
At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches.
My Legal and Moral Position:
The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with.
This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation.
You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds.
Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility.
The rules apply to matches that were postponed or cancelled — but the wording "the match did not take place" in this case is fraudulent, because the market was opened due to your hallucinations.
My Demand:
I formally demand the full and immediate refund of all funds wagered on this fictitious match. You made a mistake — you invented an event that never existed — and you must compensate for it.
If you fail to return my money, I will consider this a deliberate act of fraud and will take all necessary measures, including filing complaints with relevant regulatory authorities and making this matter public.
Summary of the Facts:
I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026.
No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform.
The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication.
On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date, and after May 31 — your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place."
At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches.
My Legal and Moral Position:
The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with.
This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation.
You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds.
Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility.
The rules apply to matches that were postponed or cancelled — but the wording "the match did not take place" in this case is fraudulent, because the market was opened due to your hallucinations.
My Demand:
I formally demand the full and immediate refund of all funds wagered on this fictitious match. You made a mistake — you invented an event that never existed — and you must compensate for it.
If you fail to return my money, I will consider this a deliberate act of fraud and will take all necessary measures, including filing complaints with relevant regulatory authorities and making this matter public.
what football match?
what football match?
https://polymarket.com/ru/sports/trsk/trsk-fen-sam-2026-06-01
https://polymarket.com/ru/sports/trsk/trsk-fen-sam-2026-06-01
The addition was released on June 2 — not on June 1 and not on May 31! The fact that you added it afterward does not relieve you of responsibility for holding a match that should never have taken place at all.
The addition was released on June 2 — not on June 1 and not on May 31! The fact that you added it afterward does not relieve you of responsibility for holding a match that should never have taken place at all.
"The outcome 'the event did not take place' is an answer for a match that was postponed or did not occur due to force majeure — but in no way for an event that was never scheduled to happen in the first place.
"The outcome 'the event did not take place' is an answer for a match that was postponed or did not occur due to force majeure — but in no way for an event that was never scheduled to happen in the first place.
I have no desire to pay for their hallucinations! The platform is responsible for the accuracy of the market. And the fact that they published deliberately false information and then try to cover it up in a very brazen manner does not relieve them of responsibility.
I have no desire to pay for their hallucinations! The platform is responsible for the accuracy of the market. And the fact that they published deliberately false information and then try to cover it up in a very brazen manner does not relieve them of responsibility.
And it has already been three weeks! I ask specific questions, and they keep running away!
And it has already been three weeks! I ask specific questions, and they keep running away!
Summary of the Facts:
I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026.
No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform.
The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication.
On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date— your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place."
At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches.
My Legal and Moral Position:
The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with.
This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation.
You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds.
Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility.
My Demand:
I formally demand the full and immediate refund of all funds wagered on this fictitious match. You made a mistake — you invented an event that never existed — and you must compensate for it.
If you fail to return my money, I will consider this a deliberate act of fraud and will take all necessary measures, including filing complaints with relevant regulatory authorities and making this matter public.
Summary of the Facts:
I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026.
No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform.
The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication.
On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date— your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place."
At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches.
My Legal and Moral Position:
The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with.
This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation.
You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds.
Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility.
My Demand:
I formally demand the full and immediate refund of all funds wagered on this fictitious match. You made a mistake — you invented an event that never existed — and you must compensate for it.
If you fail to return my money, I will consider this a deliberate act of fraud and will take all necessary measures, including filing complaints with relevant regulatory authorities and making this matter public.
The wording 'match cancelled' applies to matches that were scheduled but for some reason did not take place! This match was not scheduled by any football federation — the match is a fabrication of the platform, and the wording 'match cancelled' simply does not apply here.
The wording 'match cancelled' applies to matches that were scheduled but for some reason did not take place! This match was not scheduled by any football federation — the match is a fabrication of the platform, and the wording 'match cancelled' simply does not apply here.
https://polymarket.com/ru/sports/trsk/trsk-fen-sam-2026-06-01
https://polymarket.com/ru/sports/trsk/trsk-fen-sam-2026-06-01
0xdeFA1d28c56b30a053e870F89754f5e0AbAcd902
0xdeFA1d28c56b30a053e870F89754f5e0AbAcd902
Summary of the Facts:
I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026.
No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform.
The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication.
On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date— your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place."
At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches.
My Legal and Moral Position:
The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with.
This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation.
You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds.
Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility.
My Demand:
Summary of the Facts:
I placed a wager on a football match that was advertised as taking place on June 1, 2026.
No official football federation — including FIFA, UEFA, or any national association — had any knowledge of or sanctioned this match. This means the match never actually existed and was entirely fabricated by your platform.
The match was not cancelled and not postponed. These are standard, legitimate scenarios. This was neither. The event was simply invented — a complete fabrication.
On June 2, 2026 — one day after the alleged match date— your platform published a rule amendment stating that the match "did not take place."
At the time I placed my wager, there was no disclaimer stating that you do not take responsibility for hallucinations, fictitious events, or fabricated matches.
My Legal and Moral Position:
The retroactive rule change (published on June 2) is an attempt to justify non-payment for an event that was never real to begin with.
This is not a cancellation or postponement — it is fraudulent misrepresentation.
You cannot change the terms of the agreement after the fact to deprive customers of their funds.
Your silence and delay in addressing this issue only confirm that you are avoiding responsibility.
My Demand:
The wording 'match cancelled' applies to matches that were scheduled but for some reason did not take place! This match was not scheduled by any football federation — the match is a fabrication of the platform, and the wording 'match cancelled' simply does not apply here.
https://polymarket.com/ru/sports/trsk/trsk-fen-sam-2026-06-01
0xdeFA1d28c56b30a053e870F89754f5e0AbAcd902
The wording 'match cancelled' applies to matches that were scheduled but for some reason did not take place! This match was not scheduled by any football federation — the match is a fabrication of the platform, and the wording 'match cancelled' simply does not apply here.
https://polymarket.com/ru/sports/trsk/trsk-fen-sam-2026-06-01
0xdeFA1d28c56b30a053e870F89754f5e0AbAcd902