2026-06-25 · Kalshi · 8 条相关讨论
the "exchange sharding" page still 404s but it looks like they're going ahead and implementing it, judging by these changelog entries https://docs.kalshi.com/changelog#july-2-2026 + https://docs.kalshi.com/changelog#june-25-2026-2
the "exchange sharding" page still 404s but it looks like they're going ahead and implementing it, judging by these changelog entries https://docs.kalshi.com/changelog#july-2-2026 + https://docs.kalshi.com/changelog#june-25-2026-2
What does this even mean?
What does this even mean?
I thought the exchange index was related to perps vs event contracts but that seems to not be true
I thought the exchange index was related to perps vs event contracts but that seems to not be true
there's def some semantic overloading, or at least crowding, going on
there's def some semantic overloading, or at least crowding, going on
looks like the old https://docs.kalshi.com/getting_started/exchange_sharding url never made it into the internet archive so i can't pull it up verbatim, but the short version (from memory) is that each market is assigned to one index, and you need to maintain separate per-index balances to collateralize resting orders on that index only
looks like the old https://docs.kalshi.com/getting_started/exchange_sharding url never made it into the internet archive so i can't pull it up verbatim, but the short version (from memory) is that each market is assigned to one index, and you need to maintain separate per-index balances to collateralize resting orders on that index only
i think it still ultimately is, but the complexity falls onto us in order to avoid needing to do atomic cross-shard balance comparisons, James spoke about it here https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/927686720990892032/1504628916776865843
i think it still ultimately is, but the complexity falls onto us in order to avoid needing to do atomic cross-shard balance comparisons, James spoke about it here https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/927686720990892032/1504628916776865843
not to bombard you James, but, to jump off of what <@1307399713108135956> and <@523970833371234319> were discussing above, is there more info coming down the pipe on the exchange sharding/indexing?
not to bombard you James, but, to jump off of what <@1307399713108135956> and <@523970833371234319> were discussing above, is there more info coming down the pipe on the exchange sharding/indexing?
word, appreciate it
word, appreciate it