PolymarketAnother day another lovely debate
Another day another lovely debate
Vespucci参与话题 1消息总数 24
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 24 条，显示第 1-24 条Polymarket coming in clutch
Polymarket coming in clutch
Iran has literally said that they have not enriched
Iran has literally said that they have not enriched
gl
gl
bad argument imo
bad argument imo
Hes talking contingent like everything is conditional because you can die tomorrow
Hes talking contingent like everything is conditional because you can die tomorrow
Good, it should be no
Good, it should be no
I dont think the author creator of this beautiful table will be happy with the AI accusations
I dont think the author creator of this beautiful table will be happy with the AI accusations
Thats offensive
Thats offensive
No I could never make such a beautiful table
No I could never make such a beautiful table
Time to put the fries in the bag fellas
Time to put the fries in the bag fellas
Let the gods (bosaurum) decide
Let the gods (bosaurum) decide
Bro we are going in circles atp
Bro we are going in circles atp
AFTER THE DEAL
AFTER THE DEAL
Suggestions, negotiations, **expressions of openness**, or other non-definitive statements will not qualify.
Suggestions, negotiations, **expressions of openness**, or other non-definitive statements will not qualify.
The clause literally says "extendable by mutual consent", so its a timeline that is not finalized at all. Any commitment that is conditional on a negotiation process that can be changed or not even happen at all is not definitive
The clause literally says "extendable by mutual consent", so its a timeline that is not finalized at all. Any commitment that is conditional on a negotiation process that can be changed or not even happen at all is not definitive
If a commitment is conditional on a sure thing its still definitive. The final deal here however is NOT SURE AT ALL, thus not definitive!
If a commitment is conditional on a sure thing its still definitive. The final deal here however is NOT SURE AT ALL, thus not definitive!
Why dont you guys go and try to argue for enrichment because that should actually resolve Y
Why dont you guys go and try to argue for enrichment because that should actually resolve Y
🇳 🇴
🇳 🇴
Yes its a conditional commitment but its not a definitive commitment because Y is a condition precendent that has not occurred yet
Yes its a conditional commitment but its not a definitive commitment because Y is a condition precendent that has not occurred yet
The rules need a definitive commitment. This can be changed depending on if the final deal happens, thus not definitive.
The rules need a definitive commitment. This can be changed depending on if the final deal happens, thus not definitive.
Thats a wonderful argument
Thats a wonderful argument
Most of it is because it isnt contingent
Most of it is because it isnt contingent
Different. This is language in a MoU (non binding) and the US can choose not to withdraw at any moment if something with the final deal doesnt work out. Therefore in my opinion its contingent and not definitive
Different. This is language in a MoU (non binding) and the US can choose not to withdraw at any moment if something with the final deal doesnt work out. Therefore in my opinion its contingent and not definitive