聊天记录
共 19 条，显示第 1-19 条
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
The answer should be NO. This market should have been proposed already — all resolution conditions are met, and the only missing step is an eligible proposer submitting it.
Evidence:
* Official case docket: Musk v. Altman, No. 4:24-cv-04722, N.D. Cal.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69013420/musk-v-altman/
* Reuters: A U.S. jury ruled against Musk and found OpenAI / Altman not liable.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-loses-lawsuit-against-openai-2026-05-18/
* Business Insider: Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers accepted the unanimous jury verdict.
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-appeal-lawsuit-openai-verdict-2026-5
* Guardian: Musk said he will appeal to the Ninth Circuit.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/may/18/sam-altman-trial-victory-elon-musk-openai
The market rules explicitly exclude appeals and only consider the trial-level outcome. Since Musk already lost at the trial level, the correct resolution is NO.
Could an eligible proposer please submit it?
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
The answer should be NO. This market should have been proposed already — all resolution conditions are met, and the only missing step is an eligible proposer submitting it.
Evidence:
* Official case docket: Musk v. Altman, No. 4:24-cv-04722, N.D. Cal.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69013420/musk-v-altman/
* Reuters: A U.S. jury ruled against Musk and found OpenAI / Altman not liable.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-loses-lawsuit-against-openai-2026-05-18/
* Business Insider: Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers accepted the unanimous jury verdict.
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-appeal-lawsuit-openai-verdict-2026-5
* Guardian: Musk said he will appeal to the Ninth Circuit.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/may/18/sam-altman-trial-victory-elon-musk-openai
The market rules explicitly exclude appeals and only consider the trial-level outcome. Since Musk already lost at the trial level, the correct resolution is NO.
Could an eligible proposer please submit it?
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
The answer should be NO. This market should have been proposed already — all resolution conditions are met, and the only missing step is an eligible proposer submitting it.
Evidence:
* Official case docket: Musk v. Altman, No. 4:24-cv-04722, N.D. Cal.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69013420/musk-v-altman/
* Reuters: A U.S. jury ruled against Musk and found OpenAI / Altman not liable.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-loses-lawsuit-against-openai-2026-05-18/
* Business Insider: Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers accepted the unanimous jury verdict.
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-appeal-lawsuit-openai-verdict-2026-5
* Guardian: Musk said he will appeal to the Ninth Circuit.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/may/18/sam-altman-trial-victory-elon-musk-openai
The market rules explicitly exclude appeals and only consider the trial-level outcome. Since Musk already lost at the trial level, the correct resolution is NO.
Could an eligible proposer please submit it?
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
The answer should be NO. This market should have been proposed already — all resolution conditions are met, and the only missing step is an eligible proposer submitting it.
Evidence:
* Official case docket: Musk v. Altman, No. 4:24-cv-04722, N.D. Cal.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69013420/musk-v-altman/
* Reuters: A U.S. jury ruled against Musk and found OpenAI / Altman not liable.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-loses-lawsuit-against-openai-2026-05-18/
* Business Insider: Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers accepted the unanimous jury verdict.
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-appeal-lawsuit-openai-verdict-2026-5
* Guardian: Musk said he will appeal to the Ninth Circuit.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/may/18/sam-altman-trial-victory-elon-musk-openai
The market rules explicitly exclude appeals and only consider the trial-level outcome. Since Musk already lost at the trial level, the correct resolution is NO.
Could an eligible proposer please submit it?
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
The answer is NO. This market should have been proposed for resolution long ago. All resolution conditions have been fully met, and the only missing step is an eligible proposer submitting the resolution.
Evidence:
Court case docket — Musk v. Altman, No. 4:24-cv-04722:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69013420/musk-v-altman/
The jury unanimously ruled against Musk, and the judge accepted the verdict. Musk acknowledged the adverse trial-level result and announced that he would appeal:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-loses-lawsuit-against-openai-2026-05-18/
Most importantly, the market rules explicitly state:
“This market applies only to trial-level case resolutions and does not include any appeals.”
Therefore, Musk’s planned appeal is irrelevant to this market. The completed trial-level outcome satisfies the resolution criteria, and the market should resolve NO.
Could an eligible proposer please submit it?
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
The answer is NO. This market should have been proposed for resolution long ago. All resolution conditions have been fully met, and the only missing step is an eligible proposer submitting the resolution.
Evidence:
Court case docket — Musk v. Altman, No. 4:24-cv-04722:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69013420/musk-v-altman/
The jury unanimously ruled against Musk, and the judge accepted the verdict. Musk acknowledged the adverse trial-level result and announced that he would appeal:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-loses-lawsuit-against-openai-2026-05-18/
Most importantly, the market rules explicitly state:
“This market applies only to trial-level case resolutions and does not include any appeals.”
Therefore, Musk’s planned appeal is irrelevant to this market. The completed trial-level outcome satisfies the resolution criteria, and the market should resolve NO.
Could an eligible proposer please submit it?
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
The answer is NO. This market should have been proposed for resolution long ago. All resolution conditions have been fully met, and the only missing step is an eligible proposer submitting the resolution.
Evidence:
Court case docket — Musk v. Altman, No. 4:24-cv-04722:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69013420/musk-v-altman/
The jury unanimously ruled against Musk, and the judge accepted the verdict. Musk acknowledged the adverse trial-level result and announced that he would appeal:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-loses-lawsuit-against-openai-2026-05-18/
Most importantly, the market rules explicitly state:
“This market applies only to trial-level case resolutions and does not include any appeals.”
Therefore, Musk’s planned appeal is irrelevant to this market. The completed trial-level outcome satisfies the resolution criteria, and the market should resolve NO.
Could an eligible proposer please submit it?
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
The answer is NO. This market should have been proposed for resolution long ago. All resolution conditions have been fully met, and the only missing step is an eligible proposer submitting the resolution.
Evidence:
Court case docket — Musk v. Altman, No. 4:24-cv-04722:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69013420/musk-v-altman/
The jury unanimously ruled against Musk, and the judge accepted the verdict. Musk acknowledged the adverse trial-level result and announced that he would appeal:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-loses-lawsuit-against-openai-2026-05-18/
Most importantly, the market rules explicitly state:
“This market applies only to trial-level case resolutions and does not include any appeals.”
Therefore, Musk’s planned appeal is irrelevant to this market. The completed trial-level outcome satisfies the resolution criteria, and the market should resolve NO.
Could an eligible proposer please submit it?
pls resolve this
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
pls resolve this
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
The answer should be NO. The rules clearly say this market only considers the trial-level outcome and excludes appeals. Musk has already lost at the trial level, so all resolution conditions appear to be fully met.
This market should have been proposed for resolution already. The only thing missing now is someone eligible to submit the resolution proposal.
Could any eligible proposer please review and submit it?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
The answer should be NO. The rules clearly say this market only considers the trial-level outcome and excludes appeals. Musk has already lost at the trial level, so all resolution conditions appear to be fully met.
This market should have been proposed for resolution already. The only thing missing now is someone eligible to submit the resolution proposal.
Could any eligible proposer please review and submit it?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
It should resolve to NO. The rules clearly exclude appeals, and Musk already lost at the trial level. Any eligible proposer able to submit this?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
It should resolve to NO. The rules clearly exclude appeals, and Musk already lost at the trial level. Any eligible proposer able to submit this?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
It should resolve to NO. The rules clearly exclude appeals, and Musk already lost at the trial level. Any eligible proposer able to submit this?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
It should resolve to NO. The rules clearly exclude appeals, and Musk already lost at the trial level. Any eligible proposer able to submit this?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Yes, it’s very obvious.
Yes, it’s very obvious.
The only lesson is that, in the future, I’ll first check what the whitelisted users are buying before deciding whether to buy in myself. Otherwise, even if you are right, whether the market can actually settle is still a problem.
The only lesson is that, in the future, I’ll first check what the whitelisted users are buying before deciding whether to buy in myself. Otherwise, even if you are right, whether the market can actually settle is still a problem.
free money bro👍
free money bro👍
😂 😂
😂 😂
I am really disappointed .
This market clearly meets the criteria for settlement, but because I do not meet UMA’s whitelist requirements, I am unable to propose the settlement myself. I also submitted a request in proposal-requests, but it has not led to any result.
The issue is simple: this market is too small to attract the attention of whitelisted users, while the people who actually understand this market are not eligible to initiate settlement.
This makes me seriously question whether a mechanism where only UMA whitelisted users can initiate settlement is sufficient to support Polymarket’s future growth.
1. How are whitelisted users selected? Is the process fair?
2. Is it realistic for only this limited group of users to handle settlement proposals for so many new and emerging markets?
3. Why can’t more users be given the right to initiate settlement proposals? The system could raise the reward and penalty levels instead of simply controlling access through a whitelist.
4. How does UMA prevent whitelisted users from using their privileged position for personal profit?
I understand that prediction markets are still an emerging field and cannot be perfect from the beginning. But I hope the problems we are identifying can draw your attention and lead to improvements, rather than waiting until these issues escalate into a serious disaster before trying to fix them.
Market link:
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
I am really disappointed .
This market clearly meets the criteria for settlement, but because I do not meet UMA’s whitelist requirements, I am unable to propose the settlement myself. I also submitted a request in proposal-requests, but it has not led to any result.
The issue is simple: this market is too small to attract the attention of whitelisted users, while the people who actually understand this market are not eligible to initiate settlement.
This makes me seriously question whether a mechanism where only UMA whitelisted users can initiate settlement is sufficient to support Polymarket’s future growth.
1. How are whitelisted users selected? Is the process fair?
2. Is it realistic for only this limited group of users to handle settlement proposals for so many new and emerging markets?
3. Why can’t more users be given the right to initiate settlement proposals? The system could raise the reward and penalty levels instead of simply controlling access through a whitelist.
4. How does UMA prevent whitelisted users from using their privileged position for personal profit?
I understand that prediction markets are still an emerging field and cannot be perfect from the beginning. But I hope the problems we are identifying can draw your attention and lead to improvements, rather than waiting until these issues escalate into a serious disaster before trying to fix them.
Market link:
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
It should resolve to NO. The rules clearly exclude appeals, and Musk already lost at the trial level. Any eligible proposer able to submit this?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Can anyone propose a resolution for this market?
It should resolve to NO. The rules clearly exclude appeals, and Musk already lost at the trial level. Any eligible proposer able to submit this?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Hi, could you please take a look at this Polymarket market and consider initiating a resolution proposal if you agree?
Market: “Will Elon Musk win his case against Sam Altman?”
The market rules are clear that this applies only to trial-level case resolutions and does not include appeals. The trial-level result has already occurred: Elon Musk lost the case, the jury ruled against him, and the court dismissed the case. Musk may appeal, but appeals are explicitly excluded by the market rules.
For that reason, the market appears to meet the criteria for resolving as NO.
At this point, the only issue seems to be that no eligible/whitelisted proposer has submitted the resolution yet. This creates an unfair delay for market participants, even though the rule-based outcome is already available.
Could you please independently review the rules and public sources, and if you agree, submit the resolution proposal?
Thank you — I appreciate your help.
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Hi, could you please take a look at this Polymarket market and consider initiating a resolution proposal if you agree?
Market: “Will Elon Musk win his case against Sam Altman?”
The market rules are clear that this applies only to trial-level case resolutions and does not include appeals. The trial-level result has already occurred: Elon Musk lost the case, the jury ruled against him, and the court dismissed the case. Musk may appeal, but appeals are explicitly excluded by the market rules.
For that reason, the market appears to meet the criteria for resolving as NO.
At this point, the only issue seems to be that no eligible/whitelisted proposer has submitted the resolution yet. This creates an unfair delay for market participants, even though the rule-based outcome is already available.
Could you please independently review the rules and public sources, and if you agree, submit the resolution proposal?
Thank you — I appreciate your help.
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Can someone please propose for this
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Can someone please propose for this
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
The court issued its decision a long time ago, and Musk himself has acknowledged the loss and said he intends to appeal. The market rules are also very clear that an appeal does not affect the outcome.
So if there is no real dispute here, why has settlement still not been initiated?
With more and more markets being created, it is becoming obvious that a system where settlement can only be initiated by UMA whitelisted users is no longer suitable. It may even affect fairness.
For example, if I were a whitelisted user, I could simply wait for the price to drop before initiating settlement, because for a market like this, the only thing missing is someone to submit the settlement proposal.
The court issued its decision a long time ago, and Musk himself has acknowledged the loss and said he intends to appeal. The market rules are also very clear that an appeal does not affect the outcome.
So if there is no real dispute here, why has settlement still not been initiated?
With more and more markets being created, it is becoming obvious that a system where settlement can only be initiated by UMA whitelisted users is no longer suitable. It may even affect fairness.
For example, if I were a whitelisted user, I could simply wait for the price to drop before initiating settlement, because for a market like this, the only thing missing is someone to submit the settlement proposal.
This is clearly problematic. This market should have been settled a long time ago, but it has remained pending simply because no whitelisted user has submitted a request.
If Polymarket does not fix this issue, does that mean that in the future we have to check whether there are whitelisted users involved in a market before deciding whether to trade it?
This is clearly problematic. This market should have been settled a long time ago, but it has remained pending simply because no whitelisted user has submitted a request.
If Polymarket does not fix this issue, does that mean that in the future we have to check whether there are whitelisted users involved in a market before deciding whether to trade it?
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
https://polymarket.com/event/will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman?locale=event&category=will-elon-musk-win-his-case-against-sam-altman
Polymarket