聊天记录
共 6 条，显示第 1-6 条
Rule: Referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition = Just a little correlation needed.
Trust me, it's not a 50/50 deal for things like this, unless it's referring to another team in the competition.
When Polymarket creates a market with a provider, it doesn't create it randomly, there's an assigned team slots. So, in most cases, the correlation is already there
Rule: Referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition = Just a little correlation needed.
Trust me, it's not a 50/50 deal for things like this, unless it's referring to another team in the competition.
When Polymarket creates a market with a provider, it doesn't create it randomly, there's an assigned team slots. So, in most cases, the correlation is already there
I don't mix it, the fact that the official website mixed it is enough. Trust me.
When Polymarket created the market, the provider relied on that. You can't take advantage of Polymarket's mistakes...
I don't mix it, the fact that the official website mixed it is enough. Trust me.
When Polymarket created the market, the provider relied on that. You can't take advantage of Polymarket's mistakes...
power rangers = zedi esports = poor ranger
Referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. just a little correlation needed.
The most important thing is that it cannot be confused with other teams in the competition.
This has already been proven in many cases.
power rangers = zedi esports = poor ranger
Referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. just a little correlation needed.
The most important thing is that it cannot be confused with other teams in the competition.
This has already been proven in many cases.
Is enough
Is enough
in the last 6 months the rules were like that:
50/50 only applies when the name references another team already in the competition. This is the point.
That's not the case here. In most past cases with this kind of name discrepancy on the same slot, it resolved 0/100. Same slot, same players, same match, just a little correlation is enough. (When ZEDI was mentioned on the official site and on egamersworld, they were referring to Poor Rangers. This is enough).
in the last 6 months the rules were like that:
50/50 only applies when the name references another team already in the competition. This is the point.
That's not the case here. In most past cases with this kind of name discrepancy on the same slot, it resolved 0/100. Same slot, same players, same match, just a little correlation is enough. (When ZEDI was mentioned on the official site and on egamersworld, they were referring to Poor Rangers. This is enough).
Up,
Can kindly someone whitelisted please resolve this? The game ended 2 months ago
https://polymarket.com/esports/overwatch/ocs/ow-sv-np-2026-04-11
Result: Solus Victorem 3-0 Naive Piggy (Bo5)
Souce: https://liquipedia.net/overwatch/Overwatch_Champions_Series/2026/China/Stage_1/Regular_Season#GS_Week_2
Resolution: OVER
Result: Solus Victorem 3-0 Naive Piggy
Map 1: SV win, NP penalized (forfeit) for being late
Map 2: SV win, played normally
Map 3: SV win, played normally
Games won by forfeit, disqualification, walkover, or default are counted towards the total, provided that the match is completed." The match was completed (3-0). 3 maps total = OVER 2.5.
Up,
Can kindly someone whitelisted please resolve this? The game ended 2 months ago
https://polymarket.com/esports/overwatch/ocs/ow-sv-np-2026-04-11
Result: Solus Victorem 3-0 Naive Piggy (Bo5)
Souce: https://liquipedia.net/overwatch/Overwatch_Champions_Series/2026/China/Stage_1/Regular_Season#GS_Week_2
Resolution: OVER
Result: Solus Victorem 3-0 Naive Piggy
Map 1: SV win, NP penalized (forfeit) for being late
Map 2: SV win, played normally
Map 3: SV win, played normally
Games won by forfeit, disqualification, walkover, or default are counted towards the total, provided that the match is completed." The match was completed (3-0). 3 maps total = OVER 2.5.
Polymarket