该用户的聊天记录定位。
is the N argument at this point just people burying their heads in the sand saying "show me the sources!" and then upon having sources shown to them, they are continuing to say "show me the sources!"
is the N argument at this point just people burying their heads in the sand saying "show me the sources!" and then upon having sources shown to them, they are continuing to say "show me the sources!"
yes exactly lol
yes exactly lol
you can agree to sit on the back of the bus without giving up your right to sit on the front of the bus
you can agree to sit on the back of the bus without giving up your right to sit on the front of the bus
you being retarded enough to think she is "mid" has me unsurprised that you also support N
you being retarded enough to think she is "mid" has me unsurprised that you also support N
ivanka trum good lawd 🥵
ivanka trum good lawd 🥵
There is a consensus of credible reporting that iran agreed to "status quo" and there is consensus of credible reporting (plus gov statements from BOTH sides!!) that said "status quo" is no enrichment. do you lack objectp ermanence skills?
There is a consensus of credible reporting that iran agreed to "status quo" and there is consensus of credible reporting (plus gov statements from BOTH sides!!) that said "status quo" is no enrichment. do you lack objectp ermanence skills?
yes i agree. some clause ahout "indefinitely" or "for the forseeable future" or some similar wording
yes i agree. some clause ahout "indefinitely" or "for the forseeable future" or some similar wording
agreed
agreed
the delegation is currently there lol
the delegation is currently there lol
tbqh
tbqh
both should be Y
both should be Y
<@1171583882152386650> bye bye
<@1171583882152386650> bye bye
it is serious
it is serious
so many fucking rulecucks at once this is crazy LOL
so many fucking rulecucks at once this is crazy LOL
thanks for the slippery slope fallacy. do you want to actually present an argument?
thanks for the slippery slope fallacy. do you want to actually present an argument?
that's not what is happening here lol u guys are only arguing by analogy because the actual scenario we're talking about clearly doesn't fit Y
that's not what is happening here lol u guys are only arguing by analogy because the actual scenario we're talking about clearly doesn't fit Y
so what happens if the deal is not signed by june 30? they have basically expressed openness to remove troops if a deal is signed... that is specifically excluded by rules
so what happens if the deal is not signed by june 30? they have basically expressed openness to remove troops if a deal is signed... that is specifically excluded by rules
that's not what happened though
that's not what happened though
yeah fr. THAT is the real scam. either US agrees to iranian enrichment OR iran agrees to end enrichment should go Y, but both going N is retarded
yeah fr. THAT is the real scam. either US agrees to iranian enrichment OR iran agrees to end enrichment should go Y, but both going N is retarded
TRUMP: "i am not removing troops" Polymarket: "guys i think we should resolve the 'will trump remove troops' market to Y!!!"
TRUMP: "i am not removing troops" Polymarket: "guys i think we should resolve the 'will trump remove troops' market to Y!!!"
it should not be Y lol he hasn't agreed yet he literally just said on live stream that he is not removing troops
it should not be Y lol he hasn't agreed yet he literally just said on live stream that he is not removing troops
this is not troop withdrawal ser. troop withdrawal refers to the troops stationed at bases near the gulf
this is not troop withdrawal ser. troop withdrawal refers to the troops stationed at bases near the gulf
but they haven't agreed to that yet
but they haven't agreed to that yet
this counts as an "expressions of openness" imo... they are open to withdrawing troops if an agrement is made. but they have not agreed to withdraw troops yet
this counts as an "expressions of openness" imo... they are open to withdrawing troops if an agrement is made. but they have not agreed to withdraw troops yet
can we speak english please wtf is this just tell me if u think it Y or N
can we speak english please wtf is this just tell me if u think it Y or N
PUSSYYYYYYYYY
PUSSYYYYYYYYY
turn your volume up bitch
turn your volume up bitch
like i didn't buy to scam, i bought this position >1 week ago because i thought that hezb would be included in the US/iran deal, and it WAS included in the US iran deal, and now ppl are saying it's N
like i didn't buy to scam, i bought this position >1 week ago because i thought that hezb would be included in the US/iran deal, and it WAS included in the US iran deal, and now ppl are saying it's N
i genuinely think that hezb/israel N is a scam
i genuinely think that hezb/israel N is a scam
i think the intention of the market was whether or not hezbollah and israel would be include din the deal. that's the purpose of the last clause. they were included.
i think the intention of the market was whether or not hezbollah and israel would be include din the deal. that's the purpose of the last clause. they were included.
yeah that's what the rules said for sure bro great job
yeah that's what the rules said for sure bro great job
yes. thanks for fix keaton and team
yes. thanks for fix keaton and team
ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS??? WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF A WAR AND YOUR SITE GOES DOWN AND I CAN"T TRADE???
ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS??? WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF A WAR AND YOUR SITE GOES DOWN AND I CAN"T TRADE???
is this actually you
is this actually you
<@1213965269366612029> how old are you
<@1213965269366612029> how old are you
because this market is explicitly about announcement
because this market is explicitly about announcement
>announcement market >alex says "they announced it!" >skillizzue says "but they are attacking!"
>announcement market >alex says "they announced it!" >skillizzue says "but they are attacking!"
"trump announced a deal today, despite iran not officially agreeing" basically
"trump announced a deal today, despite iran not officially agreeing" basically
don't have any position but Y should've won here after tweet today
don't have any position but Y should've won here after tweet today
i just got online
i just got online
the market is about trump announcing a deal. he pretty clearly announces a deal. idk why people are projecting new rules that don't exist
the market is about trump announcing a deal. he pretty clearly announces a deal. idk why people are projecting new rules that don't exist
okay? that's not what this market is about, though
okay? that's not what this market is about, though
hahaha
hahaha
deal was announced... the rules don't require the deal to be agreed to or in effect
deal was announced... the rules don't require the deal to be agreed to or in effect
it doesn't actually
it doesn't actually
My girlfriend's mom says there will be an 8.0 earthquake at the start of July because she does a lot of astrology and believes astrology says there will be a catastrophic earthquake first week of July. Can we get a market for 8.0+ earthquake before July 31?
My girlfriend's mom says there will be an 8.0 earthquake at the start of July because she does a lot of astrology and believes astrology says there will be a catastrophic earthquake first week of July. Can we get a market for 8.0+ earthquake before July 31?
>taking advice from rex416
>taking advice from rex416
>taking advice from rex416
>taking advice from rex416
is jack yuhyuhyuh
is jack yuhyuhyuh
who is jack
who is jack
Polymarket