Polymarketthe word "orders"?
the word "orders"?
Swaggelwander参与话题 14消息总数 414
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 414 条，显示第 351-400 条what are the arguments for no here?
what are the arguments for no here?
they do
they do
<@790041567187697675> what does your model say about the mstr market? is it at 0% or 100%?
<@790041567187697675> what does your model say about the mstr market? is it at 0% or 100%?
that would unironincally be so fking funny
that would unironincally be so fking funny
wow kids got beef
wow kids got beef
hello is this tech support?
hello is this tech support?
yesn't
yesn't
im a phd student but my arguments in here are on a 2nd grader level
im a phd student but my arguments in here are on a 2nd grader level
(offence @ everyone)
(offence @ everyone)
4th grade education is like the smartest people in here
4th grade education is like the smartest people in here
Like legit any one of us in here could sit down for 1 month and make really good guidelines that would cover 99% of cases
Like legit any one of us in here could sit down for 1 month and make really good guidelines that would cover 99% of cases
And they dont want to because it causes more volume or?
And they dont want to because it causes more volume or?
Why are yall so focused on interpreting loose rules rather than making better rules?
Why are yall so focused on interpreting loose rules rather than making better rules?
What if polymarket just wrote an actual document with rules on how these things should happen so that everyone can refer to something?
What if polymarket just wrote an actual document with rules on how these things should happen so that everyone can refer to something?
What if they just wrote a deadline in the market text? Like "happens before may 31, made public before june 6"
What if they just wrote a deadline in the market text? Like "happens before may 31, made public before june 6"
is it an insult?
is it an insult?
im just looking for a scam angle, but i do agree
im just looking for a scam angle, but i do agree
but labor day is a specific date
but labor day is a specific date
the clarif is not about this
the clarif is not about this
> TRUMP: COULD HAVE BLOCKADE OF IRAN LIFTED BY LABOR DAY what about this? He said this today
> TRUMP: COULD HAVE BLOCKADE OF IRAN LIFTED BY LABOR DAY what about this? He said this today
aha because could not will?
aha because could not will?
how
how
ah shit its 9m/1000 sry
ah shit its 9m/1000 sry
people dropped 9m$ loss on this shit wtf
people dropped 9m$ loss on this shit wtf
wtf
wtf
why is bond entry up? i sold yesterday after clarif at 99.9
why is bond entry up? i sold yesterday after clarif at 99.9
How do you do it to not get a "-" in front ofbthe number?!?!?
How do you do it to not get a "-" in front ofbthe number?!?!?
only if you use permissioned tokens like usdc or usdt or whatever. cant freeze btc or pol
only if you use permissioned tokens like usdc or usdt or whatever. cant freeze btc or pol
solidier pew pew solidier
solidier pew pew solidier
im looking to double mine too
im looking to double mine too
where can I check this stuff out? is there a link? the uma website shows such shit information
where can I check this stuff out? is there a link? the uma website shows such shit information
one little droney boy into iran could be enough to shut airspace as well
one little droney boy into iran could be enough to shut airspace as well
is there a way to see the uma vote in progress?
is there a way to see the uma vote in progress?
cuba will resolve yes in uma?
cuba will resolve yes in uma?
no u
no u
<@829756870541180988> has mispelled the url in his discord bio
<@829756870541180988> has mispelled the url in his discord bio
i thought firstsquawk in capslock meant new
i thought firstsquawk in capslock meant new
> REPORT: DRAFT US-IRAN MOU INCLUDES ACCESS TO $12 BILLION IN BLOCKED IRANIAN ASSETS WITHIN 60 DAYS; AGREEMENT NOT YET FINALIZED.
> REPORT: DRAFT US-IRAN MOU INCLUDES ACCESS TO $12 BILLION IN BLOCKED IRANIAN ASSETS WITHIN 60 DAYS; AGREEMENT NOT YET FINALIZED.
<https://nitter.net/FirstSquawk/status/2061009063266370001#m>
<https://nitter.net/FirstSquawk/status/2061009063266370001#m>
they cant because it wasnt diplomatic
they cant because it wasnt diplomatic
but maybe everything should count, and that the *diplomatic*-precon is just to include any politician, ambassador, aide, military personell etc in one word
but maybe everything should count, and that the *diplomatic*-precon is just to include any politician, ambassador, aide, military personell etc in one word
that in your view any meeting at all would be a diplomatic meeting really
that in your view any meeting at all would be a diplomatic meeting really
thats my point
thats my point
your arguments are so bad that it converts me
your arguments are so bad that it converts me
everytime you talk jack i walk closer to being a noer again
everytime you talk jack i walk closer to being a noer again
maybe, im not sure.
maybe, im not sure.
because everything is diplomatic in nature otherwise, and then there'd be no need for the distinction of a *diplomatic* meeting
because everything is diplomatic in nature otherwise, and then there'd be no need for the distinction of a *diplomatic* meeting
it can be diplomatic in nature without being a *diplomatic meeting* i think
it can be diplomatic in nature without being a *diplomatic meeting* i think
highly unusual + senior officials = diplomacy i think
highly unusual + senior officials = diplomacy i think