PolymarketIt's claiming someone could hypothetically praise something
It's claiming someone could hypothetically praise something
cenas参与话题 5消息总数 199
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 199 条，显示第 101-150 条Yes but saying someone could praise x is not him praising x
Yes but saying someone could praise x is not him praising x
Or expressing that it's his stance
Or expressing that it's his stance
It's still not him directly saying it
It's still not him directly saying it
Would be more debatable but it's a false equivalence to this case. If anything he is kinda making fun of how Muslims talk. Even something like that for insult would prob be no
Would be more debatable but it's a false equivalence to this case. If anything he is kinda making fun of how Muslims talk. Even something like that for insult would prob be no
That could be construed as intending to say f Hillary in a dodgy way, but to the letter it's not him directly saying f Hillary
That could be construed as intending to say f Hillary in a dodgy way, but to the letter it's not him directly saying f Hillary
Big if Trump doesn't blow it
Big if Trump doesn't blow it
He says could not should
He says could not should
This would be fine for yes, but that's not the situation
This would be fine for yes, but that's not the situation
By yes logic if Trump said "They hate Trump" he'd be hating on Trump
By yes logic if Trump said "They hate Trump" he'd be hating on Trump
I'm certain that all the people arguing for Yes right now shut off all the lights in their house really late at night and go walk outside and trick neighbors' dogs to come up to them with some food and then they take big long knives and slit the dogs' throats and then funnel the blood that comes from it into a Ziplock bag and take the bag into their home and smear it on random pieces of furniture and appliances and their skin and even drink a little bit of it and then arrange sets of candles in reverse pentagrams and slowly chant "Hail Satan, Hail Satan, Hail Satan," over and over again.
I'm certain that all the people arguing for Yes right now shut off all the lights in their house really late at night and go walk outside and trick neighbors' dogs to come up to them with some food and then they take big long knives and slit the dogs' throats and then funnel the blood that comes from it into a Ziplock bag and take the bag into their home and smear it on random pieces of furniture and appliances and their skin and even drink a little bit of it and then arrange sets of candles in reverse pentagrams and slowly chant "Hail Satan, Hail Satan, Hail Satan," over and over again.
I could say everyone here is gae
I could say everyone here is gae
Yeah, it's looking like they only do that when the deal is complete
Yeah, it's looking like they only do that when the deal is complete
Yeah I highly doubt this would count
Yeah I highly doubt this would count
If Iran agrees to the condition I don't see why not. Otherwise prob not
If Iran agrees to the condition I don't see why not. Otherwise prob not
How is this real crine
How is this real crine
I wish
I wish
Who will be our soccer quant?
Who will be our soccer quant?
World cup bets now?
World cup bets now?
The prob is the ballot question allows a few edge cases to default to B such as someone who doesn't have a clear opinion on A but thinks there should be a binding referendum on the matter. The question can also be adjudicated as a matter of priority. It's not a real dichotomy. This should prob still be P2 since the idea is to establish if the desire for independence is sufficient or not
The prob is the ballot question allows a few edge cases to default to B such as someone who doesn't have a clear opinion on A but thinks there should be a binding referendum on the matter. The question can also be adjudicated as a matter of priority. It's not a real dichotomy. This should prob still be P2 since the idea is to establish if the desire for independence is sufficient or not
The wording does allow it tho. The edge case in which someone simply believes this should be adjudicated in a binding manner defaults to B. It's an irrelevant case tho and the referendum is meant to determine how the desire to secede looks like in a non binding way
The wording does allow it tho. The edge case in which someone simply believes this should be adjudicated in a binding manner defaults to B. It's an irrelevant case tho and the referendum is meant to determine how the desire to secede looks like in a non binding way
Cuz he read the article dumbo
Cuz he read the article dumbo
By the gods how did you guys make it through school
By the gods how did you guys make it through school
They review security matters and capabilities is a security matter
They review security matters and capabilities is a security matter
Ok don't, it's a bad idea 😂
Ok don't, it's a bad idea 😂
Full port no then
Full port no then
It literally says review
It literally says review
The no side should read this
The no side should read this
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/02/trump-signs-downsized-ai-order-00946389
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/02/trump-signs-downsized-ai-order-00946389
It's a pre release review, no difference
It's a pre release review, no difference
This is way more fun for me than it should be
This is way more fun for me than it should be
Yeah dropping occasionally
Yeah dropping occasionally
It's pre release
It's pre release
It's not, the review is pre release
It's not, the review is pre release
Especially if they are critical
Especially if they are critical
Yes they release the model with the flaws found during the review
Yes they release the model with the flaws found during the review
Manslaughter, right in spirit as domer should since he doesn't like fine print
Manslaughter, right in spirit as domer should since he doesn't like fine print
Don't you wanna ping a few more just to make sure?
Don't you wanna ping a few more just to make sure?
It left one of their wallets
It left one of their wallets
Let's flip it
Let's flip it
But it's not uncommon
But it's not uncommon
Not sharing here bro
Not sharing here bro
Shit I have to pay like 30% regardless
Shit I have to pay like 30% regardless
Traps are gae
Traps are gae
Drones with munitions are weaponry so this doesn't really do anything
Drones with munitions are weaponry so this doesn't really do anything
I guess that's the best that can be said for y
I guess that's the best that can be said for y
There was an attempt to clash with a military asset from another country
There was an attempt to clash with a military asset from another country
N dump
N dump
Peace pump
Peace pump
Avg shitcoin rugpull
Avg shitcoin rugpull