Polymarket50c
50c
Daslyu参与话题 2消息总数 12
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 12 条，显示第 1-12 条no ml SGW 100%
no ml SGW 100%
ask your heart
ask your heart
The clause that helps SGW is “Game 1 concluded with a winner determined.” G1 was live, DINO later forfeited the same match, and refs recorded 0:2 SGW. Thats arguably a referee determined G1 win for SGW, not just “map never happened”. 50-50 is possible, but its not 100% clean.
The clause that helps SGW is “Game 1 concluded with a winner determined.” G1 was live, DINO later forfeited the same match, and refs recorded 0:2 SGW. Thats arguably a referee determined G1 win for SGW, not just “map never happened”. 50-50 is possible, but its not 100% clean.
If youre that confident, just take a loan and become the next Elon Musk by tomorrow bro.
If youre that confident, just take a loan and become the next Elon Musk by tomorrow bro.
Imo the cleanest resolution is: SGW ML, SGW Game 1, and 50-50 for the rest of the map/prop markets. The match had already started, Game 1 was live before the technical pause, and DINO later forfeited the match. The official result was recorded as DINO 0:2 SGW, so ML should clearly be SGW. For Game 1, since it had already started and the opponent later forfeited the same match, SGW Game 1 is the logical resolution. But G2/G3/props that were never actually played should be 50-50.
Imo the cleanest resolution is: SGW ML, SGW Game 1, and 50-50 for the rest of the map/prop markets. The match had already started, Game 1 was live before the technical pause, and DINO later forfeited the match. The official result was recorded as DINO 0:2 SGW, so ML should clearly be SGW. For Game 1, since it had already started and the opponent later forfeited the same match, SGW Game 1 is the logical resolution. But G2/G3/props that were never actually played should be 50-50.
SGW post said the match was temporarily paused due to electricity issues, and the stream wording was “game will resume afterwards”.
SGW post said the match was temporarily paused due to electricity issues, and the stream wording was “game will resume afterwards”.
This is not a prematch forfeit. The original SGW vs DINO match had already begun, with Game 1 in progress before the technical pause. The later “rematch” was a continuation/replay attempt of the same market event, not a separate new match. The official announcement says DINO forfeited this match and the final result is DINO 0:2 SGW. Under the Match Winner rules, if the match begins but is not completed and one team wins due to the opponent’s forfeiture/walkover, the market resolves to the team who wins. Therefore Match Winner should resolve SGW, not 50-50. Individual Game markets may be different.
This is not a prematch forfeit. The original SGW vs DINO match had already begun, with Game 1 in progress before the technical pause. The later “rematch” was a continuation/replay attempt of the same market event, not a separate new match. The official announcement says DINO forfeited this match and the final result is DINO 0:2 SGW. Under the Match Winner rules, if the match begins but is not completed and one team wins due to the opponent’s forfeiture/walkover, the market resolves to the team who wins. Therefore Match Winner should resolve SGW, not 50-50. Individual Game markets may be different.
Game 1 had begun before the technical pause. DINO subsequently forfeited the match, and the official final score was recorded as DINO 0:2 SGW. Because the official match result awards SGW both games, Game 1 should resolve to SGW.
Game 1 had begun before the technical pause. DINO subsequently forfeited the match, and the official final score was recorded as DINO 0:2 SGW. Because the official match result awards SGW both games, Game 1 should resolve to SGW.
add this match plz <a:dance:1479897858529558559>
add this match plz <a:dance:1479897858529558559>
Sounds good, waiting on it 👀
Sounds good, waiting on it 👀
add plz valorant
add plz valorant