Hey guys, wrongly deployed event, it allows 8 markets to resolve to YES, but it's deployed as neg-risk, so only 1 winner allowed. Already 2 million volume, you should take it down ASAP: https://polymarket.com/event/blast-bounty-2026-season-2-qualify-to-stage-2-lan-20260709151942745
Hey guys, wrongly deployed event, it allows 8 markets to resolve to YES, but it's deployed as neg-risk, so only 1 winner allowed. Already 2 million volume, you should take it down ASAP: https://polymarket.com/event/blast-bounty-2026-season-2-qualify-to-stage-2-lan-20260709151942745
Hey wrongly deployed event, it allows 8 markets to resolve to YES, but it's deployed as neg-risk, so only 1 winner allowed. Already 2 million volume, you should take it down ASAP: https://polymarket.com/event/blast-bounty-2026-season-2-qualify-to-stage-2-lan-20260709151942745
Hey wrongly deployed event, it allows 8 markets to resolve to YES, but it's deployed as neg-risk, so only 1 winner allowed. Already 2 million volume, you should take it down ASAP: https://polymarket.com/event/blast-bounty-2026-season-2-qualify-to-stage-2-lan-20260709151942745
Hey wrongly deployed event, it allows 8 markets to resolve to YES, but it's deployed as neg-risk, so only 1 winner allowed. Already 2 million volume, you should take it down ASAP: https://polymarket.com/event/blast-bounty-2026-season-2-qualify-to-stage-2-lan-20260709151942745
Hey wrongly deployed event, it allows 8 markets to resolve to YES, but it's deployed as neg-risk, so only 1 winner allowed. Already 2 million volume, you should take it down ASAP: https://polymarket.com/event/blast-bounty-2026-season-2-qualify-to-stage-2-lan-20260709151942745
All 32 markets here seem to be negrisk, no?
All 32 markets here seem to be negrisk, no?
Take it down 8 markets need to go Y but this is neg-risk so only 1 can go
Take it down 8 markets need to go Y but this is neg-risk so only 1 can go
I see now
I see now
The event itself is negrisk, which allows conversions, etc. https://docs.polymarket.com/advanced/neg-risk But this contradicts the wording in the event itself, which states 8 markets can resolve to YES
The event itself is negrisk, which allows conversions, etc. https://docs.polymarket.com/advanced/neg-risk But this contradicts the wording in the event itself, which states 8 markets can resolve to YES
ok its being archived...
ok its being archived...
my positions disappeared?
my positions disappeared?
now the orderbook for the blast thing is not loading
now the orderbook for the blast thing is not loading
They archived a negrisk market
They archived a negrisk market
oh same
oh same
What happens now? Full refund?
What happens now? Full refund?
Which wasn’t supposed to be negrisk
Which wasn’t supposed to be negrisk
Wait for announcement
Wait for announcement
What happened with the Blast qualified market my positions dissapeared
What happened with the Blast qualified market my positions dissapeared
Archived
Archived
Wait for announcement
Wait for announcement
Where should I expect the announcement?
Where should I expect the announcement?
which one?
which one?
they took down the market, it was bugged. they will refund
they took down the market, it was bugged. they will refund
https://polymarket.com/event/blast-bounty-2026-season-2-qualify-to-stage-2-lan-20260709151942745/will-faze-win-blast-bounty-2026-season-2-20260709150231163
https://polymarket.com/event/blast-bounty-2026-season-2-qualify-to-stage-2-lan-20260709151942745/will-faze-win-blast-bounty-2026-season-2-20260709150231163
this one
this one
bugged cause bots were bidding the no?
bugged cause bots were bidding the no?
Clarifications will be posted
Clarifications will be posted
yeah it should get refunded
yeah it should get refunded
No
No
It was neg risk
It was neg risk
hello what will be done about the archived csgo market
hello what will be done about the archived csgo market
It was taken down quickly
It was taken down quickly
I wonder how many ppl wash traded
I wonder how many ppl wash traded
I see plenty of volume on betmoar
I see plenty of volume on betmoar
https://www.betmoar.fun/event/blast-bounty-2026-season-2-qualify-to-stage-2-lan-20260709151942745
https://www.betmoar.fun/event/blast-bounty-2026-season-2-qualify-to-stage-2-lan-20260709151942745
in the last couple of minutes
in the last couple of minutes
wdym under wash trade
wdym under wash trade
here
here
whats the point
whats the point
i assume refunds are happening at the buying price
i assume refunds are happening at the buying price
whats this mean
whats this mean
not sure how are refunds processed
not sure how are refunds processed
I just spent $200 in fees on it will that be reimbursed if the market is refunded asking because Idk what has been done in the post on refunded markets that had FEES enabled
I just spent $200 in fees on it will that be reimbursed if the market is refunded asking because Idk what has been done in the post on refunded markets that had FEES enabled
so "no" for all of them wins or
so "no" for all of them wins or
no chance that will force a loss for a lot of users
no chance that will force a loss for a lot of users
I bought yes on a bunch
I bought yes on a bunch
same
same
that would be illegal, both the title and description was corrent for 8 winners, its not our problem they cant set up the backend
that would be illegal, both the title and description was corrent for 8 winners, its not our problem they cant set up the backend
Hope we get some explanation on what is happening next for this market
Hope we get some explanation on what is happening next for this market
well the normal way they handle this is, they just pick 1 bracket for yes and resolve every other bracket to no.
Yes side on these brackets get refunded
well the normal way they handle this is, they just pick 1 bracket for yes and resolve every other bracket to no.
Yes side on these brackets get refunded
but it does feel unfair for yes holders here
but it does feel unfair for yes holders here
if its refunded I hope they also refund the fees but I doubt it honestly
if its refunded I hope they also refund the fees but I doubt it honestly
that's definitely something they should do but not enough people complain about it
that's definitely something they should do but not enough people complain about it
lmao what happened
lmao what happened
if they dont refund the fees thats terrible
if they dont refund the fees thats terrible
how long they will take?
how long they will take?
i'd be surprised if they do tbh
i'd be surprised if they do tbh
no shares no money either
no shares no money either
yikes
yikes
mm saved avg user fkd over and in this case polymarket was prob the mm
mm saved avg user fkd over and in this case polymarket was prob the mm
If they let yes holder keep their human language market definition value, they will probably have to refund the NO arbers. But since 2M has been traded that is roughly 7 * 2 000 000$ = 14 000 000$ for refund. 😱 🤯
If they let yes holder keep their human language market definition value, they will probably have to refund the NO arbers. But since 2M has been traded that is roughly 7 * 2 000 000$ = 14 000 000$ for refund. 😱 🤯
Tough call.
Tough call.
PM archived the market a few minutes after your call out. (possibly, could be trhough other channel)
PM archived the market a few minutes after your call out. (possibly, could be trhough other channel)
appreciate you man
appreciate you man
I had a lot of positions on that market
I had a lot of positions on that market
same
same
Does NegRisk resolve at 50-50?
Does NegRisk resolve at 50-50?
Will the wrongly deployed CS2 event (https://polymarket.com/event/blast-bounty-2026-season-2-qualify-to-stage-2-lan-20260709151942745) be refunded?
Will the wrongly deployed CS2 event (https://polymarket.com/event/blast-bounty-2026-season-2-qualify-to-stage-2-lan-20260709151942745) be refunded?
i doubt, this bot wouldnt bet that way
i doubt, this bot wouldnt bet that way
negrisk cannot resolve 50-50
negrisk cannot resolve 50-50
it wouldnt be able to payout, negrisk must always be 1 YES everything else NO
it wouldnt be able to payout, negrisk must always be 1 YES everything else NO
yes but in a market where everyone was buying yes on multiple positions due to the terms it's not possible to resolve to 1 YES
yes but in a market where everyone was buying yes on multiple positions due to the terms it's not possible to resolve to 1 YES
on chain it must resolve like that, so polymarket must issue refunds manually
on chain it must resolve like that, so polymarket must issue refunds manually
They don't refund the fees.
They don't refund the fees.
I sent them an email yesterday, but they haven't replied to me.
I sent them an email yesterday, but they haven't replied to me.
I don't know if it's because of their arrogance or if they simply don't have a department to check emails.
I don't know if it's because of their arrogance or if they simply don't have a department to check emails.
Hope for the refund
Hope for the refund
I don’t understand why they archived that market ?
I don’t understand why they archived that market ?
Their fault if they loose money on this market
Their fault if they loose money on this market
We should at least have compensation
We should at least have compensation
We each of us put money on that market instead of an other and now we are getting forced to be reimbursed just because of an error from Polymarket ?
We each of us put money on that market instead of an other and now we are getting forced to be reimbursed just because of an error from Polymarket ?
Totally unfair
Totally unfair
There 1,6 millions on volume
There 1,6 millions on volume
And they realised just 1-3 days after its open lol
And they realised just 1-3 days after its open lol
Insane
Insane
I believe that was their own mistake; they should have shifted our contributions to the new, correct market. Furthermore, I had already alerted them when the trading volume in this market was only 100,000, yet they failed to take action—so the responsibility lies entirely with them.
I believe that was their own mistake; they should have shifted our contributions to the new, correct market. Furthermore, I had already alerted them when the trading volume in this market was only 100,000, yet they failed to take action—so the responsibility lies entirely with them.
But I don’t understand really why they did this basically?
But I don’t understand really why they did this basically?
They were about to lose money ?
They were about to lose money ?
The rules were clear
The rules were clear
Who are the 8 teams to qualify for the LAN
Who are the 8 teams to qualify for the LAN
Simple
Simple
It was only after I had invested $3,000 and bought in at a high price that I realized the market allowed for splits and conversions. If they were to refund me only the value of 1,000 shares, I would lose $3,000 due to their error—which is unfair to me.
It was only after I had invested $3,000 and bought in at a high price that I realized the market allowed for splits and conversions. If they were to refund me only the value of 1,000 shares, I would lose $3,000 due to their error—which is unfair to me.
They should just reimburse the ones that did that and let the other with their position wtf
They should just reimburse the ones that did that and let the other with their position wtf
Dunno if it’s possible tho
Dunno if it’s possible tho
Yes, I double-checked with my AI multiple times; this is a market with eight possible outcomes, but due to an error on their part, it was set up to allow for only one result.
Yes, I double-checked with my AI multiple times; this is a market with eight possible outcomes, but due to an error on their part, it was set up to allow for only one result.
By the time I went to check if the convert was possible, it was already too late.
By the time I went to check if the convert was possible, it was already too late.
I could have converted 4,000 shares, but I only managed to buy 1,000.
I could have converted 4,000 shares, but I only managed to buy 1,000.
I have saved a lot of screenshot evidence, including chat logs with their online customer service; the representative told me the matter had been submitted to the relevant department, yet I received no response within 24 hours.
I have saved a lot of screenshot evidence, including chat logs with their online customer service; the representative told me the matter had been submitted to the relevant department, yet I received no response within 24 hours.
I also sent a message about this issue to their official CS Twitter account; they sent out other information but didn't reply to me, which made me very angry.
I also sent a message about this issue to their official CS Twitter account; they sent out other information but didn't reply to me, which made me very angry.
Moreover, they still haven't issued any announcements regarding this market, which is even more unfair to those unable to access Discord.
Moreover, they still haven't issued any announcements regarding this market, which is even more unfair to those unable to access Discord.
Did you post this in discord also ?
Did you post this in discord also ?
Yeah IKR crazy…
Yeah IKR crazy…
I couldn't access Discord earlier because of issues with my old account, and it took a huge effort just to get in last night. I feel that if they don't reply to me—even when I reach out via the website, the official Twitter, and email—then Discord is pointless too.
I couldn't access Discord earlier because of issues with my old account, and it took a huge effort just to get in last night. I feel that if they don't reply to me—even when I reach out via the website, the official Twitter, and email—then Discord is pointless too.
Ok…
Ok…
Team is aware of it, we have helped to escalate it with the relevant team
Team is aware of it, we have helped to escalate it with the relevant team
已经通知相关部门了 🫡
希望很快有更新
<@238266984297529345> don’t you have any idea how this could resolve ?
<@238266984297529345> don’t you have any idea how this could resolve ?
Is this kind of problem already happened in the past.?
Is this kind of problem already happened in the past.?
I will leave it to the team in charge 👍
I will leave it to the team in charge 👍
Kim also saw
Kim also saw
I never received a reply after that.
I never received a reply after that.
You should accept the losses now, instead of making us bear them for you.
You should accept the losses now, instead of making us bear them for you.
This is the price you ought to pay.
This is the price you ought to pay.
It'll take time but each holder will be refunded.
It'll take time but each holder will be refunded.
how much and when
how much and when
1 strike will go Y and rest will go N. Losses will be refunded.
1 strike will go Y and rest will go N. Losses will be refunded.
So, who would be designated as "Yes"? It would be unfair to anyone who doesn't hold this position. I think the best approach is to synchronize all shares to the new market; that way, no one would have any objections.
So, who would be designated as "Yes"? It would be unfair to anyone who doesn't hold this position. I think the best approach is to synchronize all shares to the new market; that way, no one would have any objections.
Let's wait for the announcement.
Let's wait for the announcement.
All I can do is wait for them to handle it; if they had seen the email I sent them sooner, none of this would have happened.
All I can do is wait for them to handle it; if they had seen the email I sent them sooner, none of this would have happened.
Misconfigured neg-risk event — corralpeltzer flagged a Blast Bounty 2026 Season 2 event deployed as neg-risk (only 1 winner allowed) but structured to allow 8 YES resolutions, with ~$2M in volume. Market was archived shortly after. Resolution unclear — potential exposure estimated at ~$14M if YES holders are made whole and NO arbitrageurs refunded.
14M ？
Misconfigured neg-risk event — corralpeltzer flagged a Blast Bounty 2026 Season 2 event deployed as neg-risk (only 1 winner allowed) but structured to allow 8 YES resolutions, with ~$2M in volume. Market was archived shortly after. Resolution unclear — potential exposure estimated at ~$14M if YES holders are made whole and NO arbitrageurs refunded.
14M ？
Rich
Rich
<:PepeSuit:1040246863145730119>
<:PepeSuit:1040246863145730119>
Yeah, I actually feel really sorry for PM. On one side, not making typos on market configuration is their job. But a typo error worth potentially 14M $ feels like a lot. On the other hand, it may serve as another mirror warning for the CEO, that some part of his company culture he is responsible for is yielding this result. I hope at least one of the PM employees will have the balls to actually say it to Coplan directly in the office space, that these are the fruits of seeds he made grow.
Yeah, I actually feel really sorry for PM. On one side, not making typos on market configuration is their job. But a typo error worth potentially 14M $ feels like a lot. On the other hand, it may serve as another mirror warning for the CEO, that some part of his company culture he is responsible for is yielding this result. I hope at least one of the PM employees will have the balls to actually say it to Coplan directly in the office space, that these are the fruits of seeds he made grow.
To give him the oportunity to change this for the longterm good of the exchange.
To give him the oportunity to change this for the longterm good of the exchange.
Typos happen, its just that these blunders exchange side are too frequent to not be caused by work place culture systematic drive.
Typos happen, its just that these blunders exchange side are too frequent to not be caused by work place culture systematic drive.
I believe the best approach is to replicate all holdings in the new market; while this would still result in some losses, the impact shouldn't reach the 14 million mark, and it would be fair to everyone. When I emailed them, the market volume was only 200,000, so I feel they really ought to listen more.
I believe the best approach is to replicate all holdings in the new market; while this would still result in some losses, the impact shouldn't reach the 14 million mark, and it would be fair to everyone. When I emailed them, the market volume was only 200,000, so I feel they really ought to listen more.
Before the market closed, I estimated that at most around 3 million shares had been sold. If all those shares were transferred to the new market, they would only need to pay out on the eight correct outcomes—amounting to roughly 800,000. My estimate might be off, but this would be the fairest approach.
Before the market closed, I estimated that at most around 3 million shares had been sold. If all those shares were transferred to the new market, they would only need to pay out on the eight correct outcomes—amounting to roughly 800,000. My estimate might be off, but this would be the fairest approach.
Besides, many of them were involved in a split; they received some USD during that process, so their losses should be smaller.
Besides, many of them were involved in a split; they received some USD during that process, so their losses should be smaller.
But you are only solving the yes side issue. How about the arber that acted on the negrisk markets configuration who was by this setting forced to think he can by the NOs all combined at price (events numbers of markets - 1 ) * 100 cents ?
But you are only solving the yes side issue. How about the arber that acted on the negrisk markets configuration who was by this setting forced to think he can by the NOs all combined at price (events numbers of markets - 1 ) * 100 cents ?
I think he has line of argument as well. He may have been trading against the human definition of the market, but he traded guided by the PM confiration negrisk, which by defintion means only one market get a YES resolution.
I think he has line of argument as well. He may have been trading against the human definition of the market, but he traded guided by the PM confiration negrisk, which by defintion means only one market get a YES resolution.
Yes, I overlooked that point; they also deserve the reward they are given.
Yes, I overlooked that point; they also deserve the reward they are given.
It is indeed a difficult problem to solve.
It is indeed a difficult problem to solve.
For the record my hodling are only 776 yes shares as I discovered the oportunity last minute. So I really have no personal gain in any side. Just really curious about what the theory appraoch is here, since I assume it is unprecedented?
For the record my hodling are only 776 yes shares as I discovered the oportunity last minute. So I really have no personal gain in any side. Just really curious about what the theory appraoch is here, since I assume it is unprecedented?
I identified this market early on and invested $3,000 to acquire 1,000 shares of the outcome; I would be furious if I were paid out based on only those 1,000 shares. By the same token, the "No" arbitrageurs should also be paid out, as we were all misled by the rules.
I identified this market early on and invested $3,000 to acquire 1,000 shares of the outcome; I would be furious if I were paid out based on only those 1,000 shares. By the same token, the "No" arbitrageurs should also be paid out, as we were all misled by the rules.
Haha, nice early discovery. I would have had way more volume too.
Haha, nice early discovery. I would have had way more volume too.
Because after I invested, I realized that this market was a negrisk.
Because after I invested, I realized that this market was a negrisk.
I immediately contacted the official team afterwards, but received no response.
I immediately contacted the official team afterwards, but received no response.
Right, but than still the archivation outcome was certain. Since obv config error on exhcange side leads to corrupted price discovery process.
Right, but than still the archivation outcome was certain. Since obv config error on exhcange side leads to corrupted price discovery process.
I didn't want to lose my money; I thought I'd discovered a treasure, but it turned out like this.
I didn't want to lose my money; I thought I'd discovered a treasure, but it turned out like this.
Curious to see how the exchange reacts. They have multiple options.
Curious to see how the exchange reacts. They have multiple options.
Regardless of the circumstances, we should not be made to bear the losses on their behalf.
Regardless of the circumstances, we should not be made to bear the losses on their behalf.
This depends on what PM will decide. Some of their options are taking responsiblity and refunding, some of their options are anulation.
This depends on what PM will decide. Some of their options are taking responsiblity and refunding, some of their options are anulation.
I would not expect PM to take the option of creating losses for anyone.
I would not expect PM to take the option of creating losses for anyone.
dont feel bad for polymarket, they were aware of this issue of negrisk markets being created where they shouldnt - they issued refunds on more than one occasion in the last few months/weeks.
They should have manually verified existing negrisk markets and review their market creation process.
dont feel bad for polymarket, they were aware of this issue of negrisk markets being created where they shouldnt - they issued refunds on more than one occasion in the last few months/weeks.
They should have manually verified existing negrisk markets and review their market creation process.
Exchange reputation is important for them, but well see what they say.
Exchange reputation is important for them, but well see what they say.
It’s not a huge amount for them; their daily income is 2 million.
It’s not a huge amount for them; their daily income is 2 million.
Wow, this is NOT the first time??
Wow, this is NOT the first time??
no, it started happening like 2 months ago
no, it started happening like 2 months ago
😆 yeah, there goes my "I feel bad for them". Puts it to another perspective. I thought this was the first time.
😆 yeah, there goes my "I feel bad for them". Puts it to another perspective. I thought this was the first time.
First time on a $2M volume market tho
First time on a $2M volume market tho
it was much more ig
it was much more ig
yep this is by far the biggest one
yep this is by far the biggest one
What other markets happened this on before?
What other markets happened this on before?
They could actually handle payouts differently based on whether a position is held: "YES" positions could be transferred to the new market, while "NO" positions could be settled at $1 per share—since I noticed there aren't many "NO" shares outstanding.
They could actually handle payouts differently based on whether a position is held: "YES" positions could be transferred to the new market, while "NO" positions could be settled at $1 per share—since I noticed there aren't many "NO" shares outstanding.
If they had taken my message seriously right from the start, this wouldn't have happened; at the time, I held the largest position—though it was only 1,000 contracts.
If they had taken my message seriously right from the start, this wouldn't have happened; at the time, I held the largest position—though it was only 1,000 contracts.
That doesnt work. There were over 20 markets? At most 8 can resolve to yes, either you are a big NO holder hoping for something like 100x on your position or it just doesnt make sense.
That doesnt work. There were over 20 markets? At most 8 can resolve to yes, either you are a big NO holder hoping for something like 100x on your position or it just doesnt make sense.
My point is , 1 no share from all markets can equal at most 8$, your proposal is moving to 60$ ish area
My point is , 1 no share from all markets can equal at most 8$, your proposal is moving to 60$ ish area
I do not hold any "No" positions.
I do not hold any "No" positions.
Sure np, I just wanted to point out, why I dont think giving 1$ for every no share works.
Sure np, I just wanted to point out, why I dont think giving 1$ for every no share works.
It’s a complex issue, and everyone is discussing how it should be resolved.
It’s a complex issue, and everyone is discussing how it should be resolved.
When I sent them the email, I was wondering if they would award me a bounty for it.
When I sent them the email, I was wondering if they would award me a bounty for it.
Does anyone with a bit of visibility tweeted about this matter
Does anyone with a bit of visibility tweeted about this matter
Not that it will change anything
Not that it will change anything
But just bring attention to people like us that thought finding a gold gem
But just bring attention to people like us that thought finding a gold gem
I won’t stop using pm for this but really it’s unprofessional
I won’t stop using pm for this but really it’s unprofessional
Shares holders got refunds for that?
Shares holders got refunds for that?
it was just 2 brackets, so 1 went yes, the other one no
it was just 2 brackets, so 1 went yes, the other one no
There are a full 32 options this time—how should they handle them?
There are a full 32 options this time—how should they handle them?
The price of 1 no shares of each market is (total number of options - 8) * 1$
The price of 1 no shares of each market is (total number of options - 8) * 1$
Based on the market def, based on the negrisk def its (total number of options - 1) * 1$
Based on the market def, based on the negrisk def its (total number of options - 1) * 1$
31 brackets go N 1 go Y with refund for losing shares or a new market as you suggested!
31 brackets go N 1 go Y with refund for losing shares or a new market as you suggested!
We can only wait for the outcome. As a holder, I naturally hope they settle all markets at 1, but that’s highly unlikely—haha.
We can only wait for the outcome. As a holder, I naturally hope they settle all markets at 1, but that’s highly unlikely—haha.
But the question is, which one should be selected as "yes"? It wouldn't be fair to the other holders.
But the question is, which one should be selected as "yes"? It wouldn't be fair to the other holders.
Anyone know if this will be refunded?
Anyone know if this will be refunded?
50c
50c
Is that good? I’m not too familiar
Is that good? I’m not too familiar