该用户的聊天记录定位。
I say subjective since its black boxed and not allowed to be scrutinized. It might be calculated with objective factors but 'who knows' right?
I say subjective since its black boxed and not allowed to be scrutinized. It might be calculated with objective factors but 'who knows' right?
So its entirely subjective at the whims of the markets team - and they weigh post news trading activity in some part as a determing factor. Do I have that part right?
So its entirely subjective at the whims of the markets team - and they weigh post news trading activity in some part as a determing factor. Do I have that part right?
I'm not sure if those are the rules in the contract - i only copied what you wrote
I'm not sure if those are the rules in the contract - i only copied what you wrote
"To determine Fair Market Value, Kalshi considers the most recent stable traded price of the market immediately prior to the relevant announcement, along with trading activity, order book information, and relevant external market data." "There is no further discussion to be had. Kalshi determined the fair value, and its final." Why bother defining Fair Market Value if the attitude is simply "Because we say so"?
"To determine Fair Market Value, Kalshi considers the most recent stable traded price of the market immediately prior to the relevant announcement, along with trading activity, order book information, and relevant external market data." "There is no further discussion to be had. Kalshi determined the fair value, and its final." Why bother defining Fair Market Value if the attitude is simply "Because we say so"?
not being precise with logical objective explanations PROTECTS price manipulation Willy. Transparency is an expectation of a CFTC regulated exchange - black boxing subjective criteria is at a minimum against the spirit of regulated markets
not being precise with logical objective explanations PROTECTS price manipulation Willy. Transparency is an expectation of a CFTC regulated exchange - black boxing subjective criteria is at a minimum against the spirit of regulated markets
add set winners for challenger and ITF matches for tennis then spreads and total games over/unders
add set winners for challenger and ITF matches for tennis then spreads and total games over/unders
thanks for the clarity. do you happen to know the language in the program that explains that? Not doubting you, since the ratio is what we are seeing with our incentive reward return... I'm just wondering how Kalshi's language explains it. Thanks again
thanks for the clarity. do you happen to know the language in the program that explains that? Not doubting you, since the ratio is what we are seeing with our incentive reward return... I'm just wondering how Kalshi's language explains it. Thanks again
if I read this right, they if im first in queue for 3000 shares at the 49 and the pool says 2000 shares... and someone comes in and fills up to 200k shares also at the 49... my percentage of the liquidity incentrive would be 3/200?
if I read this right, they if im first in queue for 3000 shares at the 49 and the pool says 2000 shares... and someone comes in and fills up to 200k shares also at the 49... my percentage of the liquidity incentrive would be 3/200?
Kalshi